Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by pod2dawg » Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:41 pm
by JCoz » Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:41 pm
pod2dawg wrote:Ladies & Gentlemen,
It is now time for my yearly scUM insider update , rather than the off color posts most of you ignore. I do realize there are several threads predicting RRod's demise, my apologies.
Well, he has one year left. Tom Brady & Charles Woodson say so.
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.co ... -football/
by danwismar » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:52 pm
JCoz wrote:
I think 8 wins is the baseline this season, with a competitive bowl game. It only requires a min. of a 4-4 B10 record.
7 wins with a win over OSU might get him a last second save, especially if Tater-tot has an impressive year.
by JCoz » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:07 pm
wiz1001 wrote:JCoz wrote:
I think 8 wins is the baseline this season, with a competitive bowl game. It only requires a min. of a 4-4 B10 record.
7 wins with a win over OSU might get him a last second save, especially if Tater-tot has an impressive year.
I don't disagree that it might take eight wins to save his job, but getting there is sure not a no-brainer. I just don't see that much talent on the roster right now...I mean, outside of Forcier (OK, including Forcier) what freshmen or sophomores on the 09 team really stood out to you as future studs?
The two best defensive player on the team (Donovan Warren and Brandon Graham) are both gone. The idea that this team will be improved a lot in 2010 is hard for me to buy into. (I know nobody in this thread has tried to make that case...but I guess I'm just making the opposite one)
After the OSU game, how can UM fans feels great about going into '10 with Tate as their man at QB? I know Devin Gardner plans to play..and I hear he's a stud (OSU recruited him hard and really wanted him) But even if he's the starter, they have a second year in a row with a freshman starter at QB taking the obligatory lumps. None of their receivers are scary in the least...the strength of the offense would be a couple of above average running backs behind a so-so line. The defense should remain awful.
They didn't have the 5-6 weeks of bowl practice to bring their young players along for 2010...I just don't see them being much, if any better in '10 than they were in '09. As Dennis Hopper said in Waterworld..."A single tear rolls down my cheek"
I think the realization is hitting them now that after the group of Henne, Hart, Long, Manningham et al left, the cupboard was really a lot more bare than anyone knew at the time. Carr's recruiting at the end was not too good for a couple years, and they are really paying the price now.
by fundamentals » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:23 pm

by furls » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:00 am
by swerb » Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:10 am
wiz1001 wrote:JCoz wrote:
I think 8 wins is the baseline this season, with a competitive bowl game. It only requires a min. of a 4-4 B10 record.
7 wins with a win over OSU might get him a last second save, especially if Tater-tot has an impressive year.
I don't disagree that it might take eight wins to save his job, but getting there is sure not a no-brainer. I just don't see that much talent on the roster right now...I mean, outside of Forcier (OK, including Forcier) what freshmen or sophomores on the 09 team really stood out to you as future studs?
The two best defensive player on the team (Donovan Warren and Brandon Graham) are both gone. The idea that this team will be improved a lot in 2010 is hard for me to buy into. (I know nobody in this thread has tried to make that case...but I guess I'm just making the opposite one)
After the OSU game, how can UM fans feels great about going into '10 with Tate as their man at QB? I know Devin Gardner plans to play..and I hear he's a stud (OSU recruited him hard and really wanted him) But even if he's the starter, they have a second year in a row with a freshman starter at QB taking the obligatory lumps. None of their receivers are scary in the least...the strength of the offense would be a couple of above average running backs behind a so-so line. The defense should remain awful.
They didn't have the 5-6 weeks of bowl practice to bring their young players along for 2010...I just don't see them being much, if any better in '10 than they were in '09. As Dennis Hopper said in Waterworld..."A single tear rolls down my cheek"
I think the realization is hitting them now that after the group of Henne, Hart, Long, Manningham et al left, the cupboard was really a lot more bare than anyone knew at the time. Carr's recruiting at the end was not too good for a couple years, and they are really paying the price now.
by Anglefan » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:13 pm
Furls wrote:DickRod did not help his cause by running off what remaining talent he had.
by danwismar » Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:09 am
JCoz wrote: Can you confirm that Ohio State ever offered him?
by pod2dawg » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:22 am
by furls » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:38 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:37 pm

by jb » Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:48 pm
pod2dawg wrote:Gentlemen, my vote after seeing him against Big Red would have been to offer him. He was a man amongst boys. Dude is a beast and frankly gives me indigestion picturing him in chicken-shit yellow & blue. He has a GUN. RROD's ideal prototype. He would have been awesome following up Pryor.
I swear I am not related to him
It's all water under the bridge now. He's never seen a Cameron Heyward in his grill yet.
It will be entertaining to watch the angst up North in determining RROD's future.
by JCoz » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:06 pm
Furls wrote:I don't remember seeing much effort ingoing after Gardner, the Bucks have had their eyes fixed squarely on Braxton Miller since they signed TP (actually a little before).
by pod2dawg » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:02 pm
JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:Gentlemen, my vote after seeing him against Big Red would have been to offer him. He was a man amongst boys. Dude is a beast and frankly gives me indigestion picturing him in chicken-shit yellow & blue. He has a GUN. RROD's ideal prototype. He would have been awesome following up Pryor.
I swear I am not related to him
It's all water under the bridge now. He's never seen a Cameron Heyward in his grill yet.
It will be entertaining to watch the angst up North in determining RROD's future.
Relax.
He's got great talent to be sure. But Mooney destroyed Big Red, and Ignatius contained Grdner except for a few big plays, and Ignatius was just very good rather than great.
When he really plays aginst Men, we'll see what's what.
by jb » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:02 pm
pod2dawg wrote:JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:Gentlemen, my vote after seeing him against Big Red would have been to offer him. He was a man amongst boys. Dude is a beast and frankly gives me indigestion picturing him in chicken-shit yellow & blue. He has a GUN. RROD's ideal prototype. He would have been awesome following up Pryor.
I swear I am not related to him
It's all water under the bridge now. He's never seen a Cameron Heyward in his grill yet.
It will be entertaining to watch the angst up North in determining RROD's future.
Relax.
He's got great talent to be sure. But Mooney destroyed Big Red, and Ignatius contained Grdner except for a few big plays, and Ignatius was just very good rather than great.
When he really plays aginst Men, we'll see what's what.
Correcto Swami, Mooney destroyed everyone late as they peaked at the right time. Didn't see St. Iggy.
As I said Gardner has a GUN and was not surrounded by a bunch of future pro-bowlers believe me, I saw at least 6 drops that night against Big Red. The man has never faced the "freaks" the Big 11 will be throwing at him , I do know this; he will get the ball there..in a hurry.
He becomes public enemy #1 soon.
by danwismar » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:23 pm
JB wrote: almost everyone on that level is a stud (except Dane )
by jb » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:09 pm
wiz1001 wrote:JB wrote: almost everyone on that level is a stud (except Dane )
Nine catches in a Rose Bowl victory isn't enough to get you off the kid's back, JB?
Are you still trying (in your inimitable contrarian way) to make the case that Ohio State would be a better team if they had a taller?, faster?, heavier? player at his starting receiver position? (don't the coaches even know they have like six guys on the depth chart who could roll out of bed on a Saturday morning and be better than this stiff?)
...and believe me, I am able to appreciate the humor, LOL, J/K angle to the "Lil Dane" tag here in this forum....
...and now that Ross Homan has been named Hon. Mention AP All-American in his junior year, I'll even concede that Dane may be little more than JAG.
...and despite what it may seem like at times, I don't take the shots at Lil Dane personally....why would I?
...it can't be the hands....IIRC, he didn't have a single "drop" all season. (I'll gladly retract if someone can document one for me)
...I know...you do it just to baffle the numerous Buckeye honks around here who just watch the kid play hard, run great patterns, block like a madman downfield, and catch everything thrown his way..
...and it works. I suppose if it's enough to generate a post like this in response to it, it's all worthwhile.
I get that.
Don't stop. Lil Dane will be around for another year...
by danwismar » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:17 am
by pup » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:46 am
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
