Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri May 04, 2012 2:07 am
by bookelly » Fri May 04, 2012 2:50 am
by scrambler » Fri May 04, 2012 3:07 am
by gotribe31 » Fri May 04, 2012 7:28 am
bookelly wrote:Massive upgrade may be hyperbole. But a 60 point difference in OPS+ translates to about 3-5 WAR. Ya'll think that come September we won't think 3-5 games isn't massive? 86 wins or 90? Which team makes the playoffs?
So you all hate LaPorta. Well, right now Kotchman is 3-5 games worse than LaPorta's numbers LAST YEAR.

by pup » Fri May 04, 2012 8:49 am
by Prosecutor » Fri May 04, 2012 9:51 am
scrambler wrote:Casey Kotchman mashed a 2 for 4 tonight and now has as many rbi as Albert PUjols or even more I don't know. He also has infinitely more home runs than Pujols this year, and that is simply a fact. I think this thread should end. He's now on track.
by peeker643 » Fri May 04, 2012 9:59 am
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri May 04, 2012 10:34 am
bookelly wrote:Massive upgrade may be hyperbole. But a 60 point difference in OPS+ translates to about 3-5 WAR. Ya'll think that come September we won't think 3-5 games isn't massive? 86 wins or 90? Which team makes the playoffs?
So you all hate LaPorta. Well, right now Kotchman is 3-5 games worse than LaPorta's numbers LAST YEAR.

by motherscratcher » Fri May 04, 2012 10:59 am
pup wrote:WAR, what is it good for
Original name of War and Peace from what I have heard.
by motherscratcher » Fri May 04, 2012 11:06 am
peeker643 wrote:It's an eagle. It's Nelson Mandela or whatever was torn off in a fierce eagle v. eagle battle over the skies of Peru where it lives. One lucky eagle now has two of those Winnie Mandela deals. It's how eagles roll. The winner will flaunt that shit and emasculate the loser til the loser gets pissed and tries to win it back.
Idiots.
LaPorta blows.
He's the MotherScratcher of ball players.
Thread is over.

by Dellucci TailGator » Fri May 04, 2012 2:43 pm
by motherscratcher » Fri May 04, 2012 2:46 pm
Dellucci TailGator wrote:What exactly does LaPorta bring to the table that Shelley Duncan doesn't? At least Duncan mashes lefties and doesn't have the hip and mobility of an 83-year old man.
by pup » Fri May 04, 2012 2:48 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:bookelly wrote:Massive upgrade may be hyperbole. But a 60 point difference in OPS+ translates to about 3-5 WAR. Ya'll think that come September we won't think 3-5 games isn't massive? 86 wins or 90? Which team makes the playoffs?
So you all hate LaPorta. Well, right now Kotchman is 3-5 games worse than LaPorta's numbers LAST YEAR.
Sorry, but this is not even close to being true, just for the simple fact that WAR factors in defense. It might hold true for great vs. superstar players, but doesn't hold water for shitty players.
Case in point:
Alex Rios - 2011
.613 OPS in 537 AB for a WAR of -0.7
Ryan Ludwick
.674 OPS in 490 AB for a WAR of +0.3
For a difference in WAR of 1.0
EDIT: Even after only a month of the season (WAR is predominantly a counting stat so it's much easier to be have a higher WAR, later in the season), Kotchman's WAR is -0.6 in 84 PA which is still better than the -0.8 that LaPorta put up in 385 PA last year. Defense counts.
In summation, LaPorta is fucking terrible.
by Am I Here Again? » Fri May 04, 2012 5:06 pm
pup wrote:WAR, what is it good for....
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri May 04, 2012 5:50 pm
peeker643 wrote:It's an eagle. It's Nelson Mandela or whatever was torn off in a fierce eagle v. eagle battle over the skies of Peru where it lives. One lucky eagle now has two of those Winnie Mandela deals. It's how eagles roll. The winner will flaunt that shit and emasculate the loser til the loser gets pissed and tries to win it back.
Idiots.
LaPorta blows.
He's the MotherScratcher of ball players.
Thread is over.
by motherscratcher » Fri May 04, 2012 6:06 pm
by LarsHancock » Fri May 04, 2012 6:22 pm

by Dellucci TailGator » Sat May 05, 2012 1:14 am
motherscratcher wrote:Dellucci TailGator wrote:What exactly does LaPorta bring to the table that Shelley Duncan doesn't? At least Duncan mashes lefties and doesn't have the hip and mobility of an 83-year old man.
Well, for one, LaPorta can allegedly play first base.
by Dellucci TailGator » Sat May 05, 2012 1:18 am
by rebelwithoutaclue » Sat May 05, 2012 11:25 am
David Ortiz was crap until he turned 26. And we all know what happened after that.
by skatingtripods » Sat May 05, 2012 11:33 am
by googleeph2 » Sat May 05, 2012 12:15 pm
Dellucci TailGator wrote:The reason I don't think LaPorta can turn it around like a Bautista is something Peeker has continually said and I agree with: LaPorta can't move. Since the hip surgery, he looks nothing like he did before it. He doesn't have a stride at all, no balance. I call him Weeble Wobble. He looks like he's going to fall over after every swing.
by Prosecutor » Sat May 05, 2012 12:48 pm
by googleeph2 » Sat May 05, 2012 1:55 pm
Prosecutor wrote:I read that LaPorta is playing mostly left field for Columbus. It looks like the Indians have given up on the first base experiment.
With the acquistion of Damon to play left field and Grady possibly returning in June or July, I don't see much opportunity for LaPorta.
Somebody pointed out that he has huge numbers at home in a favorable park for hitters, but his road numbers are very ordinary.
OTOH, if he keeps raking they've got to figure out some way to give him one more shot, right?
Edit: Home OPS is 1.363 in 17 games. Road OPS is .766 in 7 games. Small sample size, but still, that's a 600 point difference. Once the Clippers have to start playing more games on the road we'll see if LaPorta's numbers fall off.
Also, he's hitting .455 with the bases empty and .192 with RISP.

by Pressrunnr » Sat May 05, 2012 6:43 pm
by pod2dawg » Sat May 05, 2012 11:31 pm
Pressrunnr wrote:......Kotchman hitting and LaPorta continuing at Columbus would be best case, since then perhaps the Tribe could move him somewhere to fill one of the other holes. However, if LaPorta keeps hitting and Kocthman doesn't, how could they not at least try to fill one of their holes with someone who could possibly fill it cheaply and without having to give up anything decent?
by Erie Warrior » Sat May 05, 2012 11:32 pm
motherscratcher wrote:That is the greatest plan I have ever read. It's absolutely foolproof.


by scrambler » Fri May 11, 2012 12:28 pm
by Liondrew » Fri May 11, 2012 12:35 pm
Pressrunnr wrote:I'm an eternal Indians optimist and am duly encouraged by their start. That said, their LF for all he brings is 38 years old and no one wanted him until a month ago; the CF, Brantley, isn't what we'd call out of the woods in terms of establishing himself as a bona fide CF for a winning baseball club; and the top starter, acquired at the cost of two top prospects (a move I applauded at the time) has, er, issues. And the first baseman hasn't hit and has really been a black hole since Thome took his talents to Philadelphia the first time. LaPorta for all his faults is crushing the ball in Triple A. I'd run Charlie Spikes out there if he gave me the most remote hope of filling one of the aforementioned holes to better ensure a longer, more fun summer (and fall -- I am an optimist after all). Give 'em a little time to see if LaPorta regresses significantly in Columbus or better still Kotchman starts hitting at least league-average? Absolutely. Kotchman hitting and LaPorta continuing at Columbus would be best case, since then perhaps the Tribe could move him somewhere to fill one of the other holes. However, if LaPorta keeps hitting and Kocthman doesn't, how could they not at least try to fill one of their holes with someone who could possibly fill it cheaply and without having to give up anything decent?
by scrambler » Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 pm
Liondrew wrote:Pressrunnr wrote:I'm an eternal Indians optimist and am duly encouraged by their start. That said, their LF for all he brings is 38 years old and no one wanted him until a month ago; the CF, Brantley, isn't what we'd call out of the woods in terms of establishing himself as a bona fide CF for a winning baseball club; and the top starter, acquired at the cost of two top prospects (a move I applauded at the time) has, er, issues. And the first baseman hasn't hit and has really been a black hole since Thome took his talents to Philadelphia the first time. LaPorta for all his faults is crushing the ball in Triple A. I'd run Charlie Spikes out there if he gave me the most remote hope of filling one of the aforementioned holes to better ensure a longer, more fun summer (and fall -- I am an optimist after all). Give 'em a little time to see if LaPorta regresses significantly in Columbus or better still Kotchman starts hitting at least league-average? Absolutely. Kotchman hitting and LaPorta continuing at Columbus would be best case, since then perhaps the Tribe could move him somewhere to fill one of the other holes. However, if LaPorta keeps hitting and Kocthman doesn't, how could they not at least try to fill one of their holes with someone who could possibly fill it cheaply and without having to give up anything decent?
Maybe the Indians brass thinks that Kotchman is going to start hitting and that if they're in contention come August, and he hasn't come around, they always have LaPorta as an option.
All I know is, if they want to take a serious shot at contention this year, they need to upgrade their offense. Those great teams of the 90's had all the hitting, but not enough pitching; now they have all the pitching they need, but not enough hitting.
![]()
That's Cleveland for you.
by scrambler » Fri May 11, 2012 1:08 pm
by Prosecutor » Sat May 12, 2012 7:56 am
by peeker643 » Sat May 12, 2012 11:02 am
Prosecutor wrote:LaPorta is cooling off fast, hitting .226 in May.
by pup » Sat May 12, 2012 9:52 pm
by motherscratcher » Sat May 12, 2012 10:27 pm
pup wrote:Even message board posters discussing him being in the show causes a large yellow puddle forms around his cleats.
by Govbarney » Thu May 17, 2012 5:22 pm
by skatingtripods » Thu May 17, 2012 5:38 pm
Govbarney wrote:If Hafner goes on the DL , does LaPorta drive up I-71 tonight?
by dazindiansfanuk » Thu May 17, 2012 5:50 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Govbarney wrote:If Hafner goes on the DL , does LaPorta drive up I-71 tonight?
Would be LaPorta getting the call, but Hafner would have to be re-evaluated tomorrow or maybe even Saturday once the swelling goes down. If Hafner isn't able to play, we'll go a couple days one short on the bench. DL's going to be a last resort. Just a bruise for now, but they'll probably look closer at x-rays once the swelling goes down.
by peeker643 » Thu May 17, 2012 6:06 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Govbarney wrote:If Hafner goes on the DL , does LaPorta drive up I-71 tonight?
Would be LaPorta getting the call, but Hafner would have to be re-evaluated tomorrow or maybe even Saturday once the swelling goes down. If Hafner isn't able to play, we'll go a couple days one short on the bench. DL's going to be a last resort. Just a bruise for now, but they'll probably look closer at x-rays once the swelling goes down.
We're already one short on the bench at the minute with Hannahan being a bit gimpy. I know he's "hoping" to be back for the w'end series, but it's gonna be pretty tough to go two men short.
Might see a bullpen guy sent down to call up some bat help or a bench guy in the short term (Donald).
by peeker643 » Thu May 17, 2012 6:07 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Govbarney wrote:If Hafner goes on the DL , does LaPorta drive up I-71 tonight?
Would be LaPorta getting the call, but Hafner would have to be re-evaluated tomorrow or maybe even Saturday once the swelling goes down. If Hafner isn't able to play, we'll go a couple days one short on the bench. DL's going to be a last resort. Just a bruise for now, but they'll probably look closer at x-rays once the swelling goes down.
by gotribe31 » Thu May 17, 2012 6:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:dazindiansfanuk wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Govbarney wrote:If Hafner goes on the DL , does LaPorta drive up I-71 tonight?
Would be LaPorta getting the call, but Hafner would have to be re-evaluated tomorrow or maybe even Saturday once the swelling goes down. If Hafner isn't able to play, we'll go a couple days one short on the bench. DL's going to be a last resort. Just a bruise for now, but they'll probably look closer at x-rays once the swelling goes down.
We're already one short on the bench at the minute with Hannahan being a bit gimpy. I know he's "hoping" to be back for the w'end series, but it's gonna be pretty tough to go two men short.
Might see a bullpen guy sent down to call up some bat help or a bench guy in the short term (Donald).
Donald has been only down for 5 days at this point. I don't think they can bring him back until next Tuesday if they're so inclined.

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
