Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by redneckofsc » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:02 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:09 pm

by pup » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:12 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:39 pm
by bookelly » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:54 pm
by motherscratcher » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:01 pm
bookelly wrote:If it's not unanimous whomever didn't vote for him should be fired.
by bookelly » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:11 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:18 pm
by redneckofsc » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:22 pm
by motherscratcher » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:35 pm
redneckofsc wrote:I have never understood how guys like Ripken, Seaver, Aaron, Schmidt, etc weren't unanimous.
I can see Ryan (only a .526 win %) or Cobb (racist asshole) or Ruth (womanizer) or Rickey, but Ripken and Seaver? WTF
by leadpipe » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:39 pm
motherscratcher wrote:redneckofsc wrote:I have never understood how guys like Ripken, Seaver, Aaron, Schmidt, etc weren't unanimous.
I can see Ryan (only a .526 win %) or Cobb (racist asshole) or Ruth (womanizer) or Rickey, but Ripken and Seaver? WTF
I agree with you, but I'm interested in what would go in Rickey's parethesis that you neglected that would explain why it's reasonable that he wasn't unanimous.
Something like Rickey (talked about himself in the third person).
Just curious.
by LakeErieWarriors » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:41 pm
by redneckofsc » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:08 pm
motherscratcher wrote:redneckofsc wrote:I have never understood how guys like Ripken, Seaver, Aaron, Schmidt, etc weren't unanimous.
I can see Ryan (only a .526 win %) or Cobb (racist asshole) or Ruth (womanizer) or Rickey, but Ripken and Seaver? WTF
I agree with you, but I'm interested in what would go in Rickey's parethesis that you neglected that would explain why it's reasonable that he wasn't unanimous.
Something like Rickey (talked about himself in the third person).
Just curious.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:14 pm
redneckofsc wrote:But Ripken on the other hand, I have never hard anything negative at all about him. He is one of the nicest, humble guys to every play the game

by pup » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:08 am
by bookelly » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:36 am
pup wrote:The argument you always hear is there is a handful of these old farts that say "If Babe Ruth didn't get 100%, nobody should" and never vote for a guy in his first year.
And that old fart probably has a protege that will follow suit.
by Jumbo » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:09 am
by redneckofsc » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:32 am
by Jumbo » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:46 pm
redneckofsc wrote:Palmeiro will never get in.
I highly doubt McGwire gets in since he was a one dimensional player and a known steroids user.
Sosa likely won't get in.
I still think Clemens gets in.
Piazza likely gets in.
Bonds is going to be the real test.
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Am I Here Again?, British_Pharaoh, cappy1920, dazindiansfanuk and 6 guests