Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 10:19 am

by dmcdougal » Mon May 07, 2007 11:13 am
by Mr. MacPhisto » Mon May 07, 2007 11:57 am
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 12:29 pm
Mr. MacPhisto wrote:Important game that can give us a split in the four-gamer; I'll take that with the 0-2 start.
I didn't look ahead on the schedule and was surprised to see the 12:35P start on a Monday. Is it a bank holiday or something?
by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 12:35 pm

by dmcdougal » Mon May 07, 2007 1:17 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 1:50 pm
by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 1:54 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 1:57 pm
NEOLeo wrote:Great to see Nixon stay hot. I can't wait to see Hafner, Martinez and at least one other person get hot at the same time.
by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 2:17 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 2:18 pm
Consigliere wrote:Nice. Barfield with a hit, steals a base, moves up on a passed ball, and scores on a hit by Sizemore. 1-0 Tribe in the 3rd.
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 2:23 pm
by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 2:29 pm
Skating Tripods wrote:NEOLeo wrote:Great to see Nixon stay hot. I can't wait to see Hafner, Martinez and at least one other person get hot at the same time.
Come on NEO. You know Nixon will be in a 1-for-27 slump when they get hot.
Skating Tripods wrote:It's time for Grady to get going with the bat. He's much too good of a hitter to be in the .220-.240 range deep into May.

by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 2:49 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 2:54 pm
Consigliere wrote:Carmona looks great so far. Nine groundball outs and three infield hits on shattered bats. Orioles tie it up here in the 5th after two infield hits and a good piece of hitting by Payton.
by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 3:00 pm
Consigliere wrote:Carmona looks great so far. Nine groundball outs and three infield hits on shattered bats. Orioles tie it up here in the 5th after two infield hits and a good piece of hitting by Payton.

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 3:02 pm
NEOLeo wrote:17 extra pitches and a run occured after the error on Barfield. For those who can actually see the game, was it a tough play?
by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 3:11 pm

by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 3:15 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 3:18 pm
NEOLeo wrote:Was the error on Blake or Barfield? Or are you just randomly blowing off steam about Blake?
by Steve Buffum » Mon May 07, 2007 3:27 pm

by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 3:27 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Steve Buffum wrote:Surely I misread that Hafner was trying to tag up on a foul out to short right.
by Steve Buffum » Mon May 07, 2007 3:29 pm
Skating Tripods wrote:Steve Buffum wrote:Surely I misread that Hafner was trying to tag up on a foul out to short right.
You didn't.

by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 3:31 pm

by Mr. MacPhisto » Mon May 07, 2007 3:34 pm
Steve Buffum wrote:Skating Tripods wrote:Steve Buffum wrote:Surely I misread that Hafner was trying to tag up on a foul out to short right.
You didn't.
That makes me sad.
by Hoover » Mon May 07, 2007 3:36 pm
Consigliere wrote:On the passed ball...easy, if the ball bounces 4-5 feet away, usually the runner at 1st can get to 2nd easily since the catcher has to make a throw of roughly 105 feet. But, the runner at third can't come home because it is a 10-20 foot throw for the catcher to the pitcher covering home. Ball didn't get away enough for Hafner.
On Hafner tagging, the ball beat him home but he was safe according to Hammy. Still, have to wonder why he was running there.....guess trying to force in a run because really Markaikis (sp) needs to make a good throw there (which he did).

by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 3:37 pm
Consigliere wrote:On the passed ball...easy, if the ball bounces 4-5 feet away, usually the runner at 1st can get to 2nd easily since the catcher has to make a throw of roughly 105 feet. But, the runner at third can't come home because it is a 10-20 foot throw for the catcher to the pitcher covering home. Ball didn't get away enough for Hafner.


by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 3:42 pm
Hoover wrote:Anyone but Hafner would've been safe.

by dmcdougal » Mon May 07, 2007 3:42 pm
by neoleo » Mon May 07, 2007 3:49 pm
dmcdougal wrote:big hit for Sizemore right there.. I missed a few innings cuz I had class from 2-3 but I was glad to see Carmona got out of that bases loaded jam with Patterson up
Interesting that they walk Casey (struggling) to load them for Travis.


by Mr. MacPhisto » Mon May 07, 2007 3:52 pm
by consigliere » Mon May 07, 2007 3:52 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 3:55 pm
dmcdougal wrote:I loved the Nixon signing- did, however, question the Michaels signing
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 3:59 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 4:02 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon May 07, 2007 4:06 pm
by Steve Buffum » Mon May 07, 2007 4:08 pm

by Steve Buffum » Mon May 07, 2007 4:08 pm

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest
