skatingtripods wrote:I'm glad we have Masterson going tomorrow.
Lucifer just put on a sweater.
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:21 am
skatingtripods wrote:I'm glad we have Masterson going tomorrow.
by RickNashEquilibrium » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:24 am
bookelly wrote:RickNashEquilibrium wrote:Win or lose, the best part of this series will be tomorrow's B-List take on Santana's last AB.
We may even have a fungus sighting.
by RickNashEquilibrium » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:29 am
by skatingtripods » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:45 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Lucifer just put on a sweater.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:50 am
skatingtripods wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Lucifer just put on a sweater.
Yeah, never thought I'd say that.
Santana's AB is still pissing me off and it happened an hour ago.
Its F@%%ing ridiculous
by pup » Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:31 am
by Jumbo » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:19 am
pup wrote:Buster Posey my ass


by Prosecutor » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:43 am
by Jumbo » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:55 am
Prosecutor wrote:This game was lost earlier when they botched the pick-off and the pitchout. Those plays cost them two runs.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:55 am
skatingtripods wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Lucifer just put on a sweater.
Yeah, never thought I'd say that.
Santana's AB is still pissing me off and it happened an hour ago.
by JacksonDysonJackson » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:10 pm
by Dellucci TailGator » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:32 pm
bookelly wrote: Jeremy Sowers could mow us down.
by gotribe31 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:42 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Grow a pair and run him over.

by gotribe31 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:47 pm
Dellucci TailGator wrote:Brantley leads off. Sizemore hits third. Hafner in clean-up. Choo fifth and Santana sixth.
This isn't rocket science, Acta. Do it. Do it now. No time to be diddling with the bullshit AB's Choo and Santana are putting up right now.
They'll hit eventually and I understand not wanting left-handers back-to-back, but for now there are some baseball games to win.
Odds are when that line-up turns around late in the game for the fourth/fifth time, it's going to be the heart of the order up in the key situations. Choo and Santana should not be in those situations right now.

by skatingtripods » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:56 pm
gotribe31 wrote:Catchers don't typically run over catchers. It's an unwritten rule.
by Prosecutor » Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:50 pm
JacksonDysonJackson wrote:Prosecutor wrote:Those last two pitches were awesome. He wouldn't have hit them even if he swung. quote]
That's quite the statement. Wanna give me some #s for the Mega Millions?
They were both nice pitches. Fastballs on the outside edge. But a good hitter battles to spoil them into foul territory. A great hitter laces a liner to left. I think most here believe Santana will be a good or great hitter.
Step 1 is to take a cut.
by JacksonDysonJackson » Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:29 pm
Not too many major league hitters could have hit line drives off those last two Soria pitches, and Santana (at the moment) is not one of them.
The Tribe also pissed away a scoring opportunity when they sent Everitt home on that Brantley single to left. Brantley has no opposite field power so Gordon was playing him shallow to begin with, then he charged the ball. He had the ball in his glove before Everitt got around third. I was screaming to hold him at third but they sent him anyway and he was thrown out by ten feet. Too many dumb mistakes that are not characteristic of this team so far did them in, along with their inability to get to Chen.
by skatingtripods » Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:35 pm
by Rat_Tail » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:09 pm
by davemanddd » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:23 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:24 pm


by peeker643 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:31 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:DAVE'S BACK!@@$@$!!@$!
by e0y2e3 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:35 pm

by davemanddd » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:29 pm
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:DAVE'S BACK!@@$@$!!@$!
Yep. Telling me LaPorta's .260 makes him a better hitter than Santana at whatever he's at two weeks in.
I can only fight on so many fronts.
And now I don't know if JB is serious with his Heat sweeping Celtics post or if he's rattling cages.
So I'll mark all as 'read', step away for 45 minutes and then hit Twitter for Tribe game and NBA playoff action.
Hate to do it but sometimes it's for the best.
I love the fact I get to pick whose shit I read and that I can make even them disappear with a click.
/*Jennifer sigh*
by peeker643 » Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:49 pm
davemanddd wrote:um, i don't know where you went to school, but in my high school, i was taught that .260 was certainly higher than .193.

by davemanddd » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:02 am
peeker643 wrote:davemanddd wrote:um, i don't know where you went to school, but in my high school, i was taught that .260 was certainly higher than .193.
So at your school LaPorta is also a better hitter than Albert Pujols since .260 is higher than .239 and playing Pujols over LaPorta would weaken you offensively.
Gotcha. Maybe we're watching different sports.
Where I went to school Santana is a better hitter than LaPorta, Dave. Feel free to continue arguing otherwise.
by peeker643 » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:09 am
davemanddd wrote:are you seriously comparing carlos santana with albert pujols???
by davemanddd » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:52 am
peeker643 wrote:davemanddd wrote:are you seriously comparing carlos santana with albert pujols???
Yes. That's exactly what I'm doing Dave. You're all over this thread in your return.
Santana had two straight days off less than a week ago.
Hit or get off the pot and more days watching ain't gonna help. Unless you can tell us all the day that he will get off the schneid and then we can just sit him til then. But it's not an on/off deal. You work your way into slumps and you work your way out every single day, at-bat by at-bat.
You're focus is hindsight and it's looking at a single game. Acta is making the call in real-time and is concerned about the next 140.
by WarAdmiral » Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:09 pm

by Prosecutor » Thu Apr 21, 2011 4:22 pm
by davemanddd » Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:47 pm
Prosecutor wrote:I doubt you can find a manager in all of baseball history that didn't try to help a player break out of a deep slump by giving him a day off. That seems to be Plan A when a player is 3-for-33 like Santana was going into that game.
Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't, but it's about all a manager can do other than dropping the player down in the order.
The question is how long to wait before giving a slumping hitter a day off. Considering the Royals were starting a lefty and LaPorta has been swinging the bat well lately (.412 in the last seven days), it seemed like a strange time to sit LaPorta down and put a struggling Santana at first base. When the lineup was announced I was very surprised to see Santana starting, so I can see where Dave is coming from.
Like all managers Manny looks at how his hitters have done in the past against opposing pitchers. Chen faced the Indians five times last year. I haven't looked it up, but maybe Carlos hit him pretty well, or LaPorta couldn't buy a foul ball off him. Like Peeks said, Manny thought it through and decided to go with Santana for a reason, even if it's not immediately obvious. So far this year most of Manny's moves have worked out brilliantly, this one being a rare exception. I'd give him a pass on this one.

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Am I Here Again?, Believeland, bookelly, CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07!, gbot, psbot [Picsearch], T_N_T and 12 guests
