Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by swerb » Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:06 am
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:28 am
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:48 am
peeker643 wrote: Hafner getting further and further away from his shoulder issues.


by swerb » Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:06 am
Erie Warrior wrote:peeker643 wrote: Hafner getting further and further away from his shoulder issues.
It cannot be overstated how important this is to the lineup. Changes the entire way 1-5 are pitched.
by Bayou Tribe » Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:50 am
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:59 am
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:02 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:I've been rolling with the free month of mlbtv so far and I've watched almost every inning thus far. I'll get to catch 12 of the aforementioned 13 games before this free trial ends, so in my superstitious ways I'll be interested to see what the splits are before and after the Tribe cause me shell out my own coin for the season long subscription.
Also, probably a question for Tony, but can we expect to see Chisenhall come in and contribute early (before the all star break) in Cleveland? Can he be a difference maker for us this year, or am I putting the cart ahead of the horse?
by pup » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:10 pm
by Kingpin74 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:17 pm
Hafner is ripping the effing cover off the ball.
And looks ripped. Looks noticably bigger and stronger than the last couple years.
Also hitting .313 against lefties (5-16) so far.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:40 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:57 pm
by swerb » Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:05 pm
Kingpin74 wrote:Hafner is ripping the effing cover off the ball.
And looks ripped. Looks noticably bigger and stronger than the last couple years.
Also hitting .313 against lefties (5-16) so far.
The big question is, if a team steps up in July with an offer to pay the rest of Hafner's contract and throws us a prospect or two, will Antonetti bite? Obviously if we keep looking great and are on a 90 something win pace, you don't mess with it. But if it's something like '02 where we're a little over .500 and a few games back in a crappy division, I think he'll take it.
Personally, I think you hang on to him regardless if his production is decent. It's only a 2 year commitment now and we're finally getting something after eating three bad years (which are now a sunk cost anyway). Interesting issue to watch as the season develops, though.
by tired » Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:10 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:31 pm
swerb wrote:Almost 6,000 walk up fans Friday night. For a game in 50 degree weather on a Fri night against the Orioles. If each fan spent $35 on their ticket and other crap, that's over $200,000 in revenue.
by Damage » Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:46 pm

by Am I Here Again? » Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:56 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:This team is different. I can't remember but I'd bet they've already swept more series' this year then they did all last year. Really excited for the rest of the season.
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:59 pm
Am I Here Again? wrote:FWIW our Tribe spent ZERO days in first place last year and never lead a game. Wow...
by danwismar » Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:23 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I wish STO would do a lot more than they do to promote us, because most people only read newspaper coverage or watch the TV coverage and there's so much cynicism and skepticism in the print guys and the TV news media that they will constantly try to tell people that the bottom is going to fall out. If they'd read us, they'd get excited and hopefully follow more closely or attend more games.
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:31 pm
danwismar wrote:I agree it would be great if they did more, but it is cool how they're running ads on Tribe telecasts at the bottom of the screen to specific TCF articles at the stohd.com website. It's something, and it's bound to drive some additional traffic our way.
by Bayou Tribe » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:18 pm
This team cannot take the PR hit of trading a key cog this summer without getting equivalent MLB ready talent back. On the contrary, if they're in it in late July, and they don't make a move to get the team help ... fans will be pissed.
by Rat_Tail » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:24 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I wish STO would do a lot more than they do to promote us, because most people only read newspaper coverage or watch the TV coverage and there's so much cynicism and skepticism in the print guys and the TV news media that they will constantly try to tell people that the bottom is going to fall out. If they'd read us, they'd get excited and hopefully follow more closely or attend more games.
by swerb » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:26 pm
danwismar wrote:skatingtripods wrote:I wish STO would do a lot more than they do to promote us, because most people only read newspaper coverage or watch the TV coverage and there's so much cynicism and skepticism in the print guys and the TV news media that they will constantly try to tell people that the bottom is going to fall out. If they'd read us, they'd get excited and hopefully follow more closely or attend more games.
I agree it would be great if they did more, but it is cool how they're running ads on Tribe telecasts at the bottom of the screen to specific TCF articles at the stohd.com website. It's something, and it's bound to drive some additional traffic our way.
Any numbers yet on traffic coming from those stohd.com hits, Swerb?
by redneckofsc » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:26 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:40 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:skatingtripods wrote:I wish STO would do a lot more than they do to promote us, because most people only read newspaper coverage or watch the TV coverage and there's so much cynicism and skepticism in the print guys and the TV news media that they will constantly try to tell people that the bottom is going to fall out. If they'd read us, they'd get excited and hopefully follow more closely or attend more games.
I dunno, there's a lot of cynics here too.
We've been getting more and more national attention with every win. If we keep it up people will hop on the bandwagon.
A split in KC still keeps us in 1st.
My friend and I got on TV at Friday's game. My friend was flicking off the camera when they intentionally walked Hafner. Surprised that gone on.
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:15 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:I dunno, there's a lot of cynics here too.
by cozmeesah » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:38 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:skatingtripods wrote:I wish STO would do a lot more than they do to promote us, because most people only read newspaper coverage or watch the TV coverage and there's so much cynicism and skepticism in the print guys and the TV news media that they will constantly try to tell people that the bottom is going to fall out. If they'd read us, they'd get excited and hopefully follow more closely or attend more games.
I dunno, there's a lot of cynics here too.
We've been getting more and more national attention with every win. If we keep it up people will hop on the bandwagon.
A split in KC still keeps us in 1st.
My friend and I got on TV at Friday's game. My friend was flicking off the camera when they intentionally walked Hafner. Surprised that gone on.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:42 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:46 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:The Tribe is flat out playing good ball. And I couldn't be any happier.
Plus we all know Choo ain't gonna hit in the .220s all year. His bat will come around.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:51 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:54 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:You don't think Choo is going to hit?
OT:
Go to NetFlix, search for The Vice Guide To Travel and watch the episode on North Korea. It's hilarious and scary.
The one on Liberia is also very disturbing.
by Jumbo » Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:58 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:OT:
Go to NetFlix, search for The Vice Guide To Travel and watch the episode on North Korea. It's hilarious and scary.
by The Brook » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:03 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:OT:
Go to NetFlix, search for The Vice Guide To Travel and watch the episode on North Korea. It's hilarious and scary.
by leadpipe » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:39 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Rat_Tail wrote:I dunno, there's a lot of cynics here too.
Mostly talking about the writers. A small percentage, something like 25-30%, who view the main page content actually view the forums.
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:42 pm
leadpipe wrote:Well, if you count the really condescending article posted last week - you now, the one that basically called people morons for merely getting excited about the Tribe's early season success....if you count that one it could be said there's cynics amongst that group as well.
by skatingtripods » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:49 pm
by leadpipe » Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:41 pm
skatingtripods wrote:leadpipe wrote:Well, if you count the really condescending article posted last week - you now, the one that basically called people morons for merely getting excited about the Tribe's early season success....if you count that one it could be said there's cynics amongst that group as well.
Was that Benz? I'll assume so. It's always raining on that guy.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:13 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:39 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Clayman's article was a great comparison of the two teams, and I understand at the end with the homegrown players section, but it irritates me that it's not really accepted that minor leaguers who come through the Indians system aren't considered "homegrown". Maybe we didn't draft them, but they developed here. We took minor leaguers and helped round them in to major leaguers.
In most cases, they've done just as much, if not more growing in our system than the system we got them from.
I realize the point, but just because we didn't draft them doesn't mean we didn't develop them.
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:42 pm
motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Clayman's article was a great comparison of the two teams, and I understand at the end with the homegrown players section, but it irritates me that it's not really accepted that minor leaguers who come through the Indians system aren't considered "homegrown". Maybe we didn't draft them, but they developed here. We took minor leaguers and helped round them in to major leaguers.
In most cases, they've done just as much, if not more growing in our system than the system we got them from.
I realize the point, but just because we didn't draft them doesn't mean we didn't develop them.
I totally agree. I think that the main reason is that the thundering hoard of Shapiro haters would rather pull out their toenails with pliers than give Shap a have inch of credit if they can avoid it.
by googleeph2 » Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:31 pm
by aclayman » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:10 am
peeker643 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Clayman's article was a great comparison of the two teams, and I understand at the end with the homegrown players section, but it irritates me that it's not really accepted that minor leaguers who come through the Indians system aren't considered "homegrown". Maybe we didn't draft them, but they developed here. We took minor leaguers and helped round them in to major leaguers.
In most cases, they've done just as much, if not more growing in our system than the system we got them from.
I realize the point, but just because we didn't draft them doesn't mean we didn't develop them.
I totally agree. I think that the main reason is that the thundering hoard of Shapiro haters would rather pull out their toenails with pliers than give Shap a have inch of credit if they can avoid it.
Meh...it's just acquisition method. Nothing being inferred in regard to developing young players. The opposite really if you know who the Indians received in the CC, Vic, CPLee deals.
They are excellent at identifying other young pros. If they continue along the recent path of doing that AND drafting well you've got a proces you can replicate and an annual infusion of talent.
by Jumbo » Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:29 am
aclayman wrote:I think it would be a mistake, though, to say that trading for prospects is just as good as drafting them. If any of those failed first round picks had panned out for us, you're filling a position from within, allowing your trades more room to build depth.
by skatingtripods » Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:04 pm
aclayman wrote:Meanwhile, I don't think any bias or judgment is needed to find it intriguing that the Indians didn't draft a single position player on this year's team. Whether bad or good or irrelevant in the grand scheme, it's at least pretty odd when you think of the hundreds of picks we've had over the past decade.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:47 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:04 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
Liking this team more and more every day.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:45 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
Liking this team more and more every day.
Do you like them more than pictures of Brunettes with breakfast food?
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest