Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by pod2dawg » Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:37 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:53 pm
by Hoover » Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:43 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:07 pm
Hoover wrote:What is Blake with RISP? Like 1-17? Bench him or let him go. To be honest, if they traded him tomorrow, I could care less. He's a net zero with a cancer bat. His utility role could be done by Inglett.
by unvme2 » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:11 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:22 pm
unvme2 wrote:I'll take neither Blake, Marte or Inglett. There is a glaring hole at 3rd, but I agree we need to pick a player and leave him there. And another fine job Wedge on your batting order. Blake is not a #2 hitter
by leadpipe » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:35 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:46 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:A number two hitter over the course of the year is going to get many more opportunities over the course of the year to drive in runs, than say, the seventh hitter. Based on ab's alone. Enough about risp or bases empty, if you hit second on a good team you need to H-I-T.
by leadpipe » Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:07 am
by Mr. MacPhisto » Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:41 am
Lead Pipe wrote:The number 2 hitter will get sooo many more at bats than the number seven over the course of the year it makes this not even close. Also, if your argument is the guy doesn't hit with runners on base, you don't move that guy up in the order. You just don't.
by pod2dawg » Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:26 am
by furls » Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:47 am
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: gbot, psbot [Picsearch] and 2 guests