Text Size

Cleveland Indians & MLB

Stark on the Indians

Talk Tribe, talk baseball in this forum.

Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau

Stark on the Indians

Unread postby consigliere » Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:53 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview07 ... id=2817890

The interesting part:

Well, it may not all have been the bullpen's fault. But it was, in fact, almost that simple. So here are five reasons the pieces are in place for the Indians to be this year's Detroit Tigers:


1. The law of averages
Start with this: What happened to this team last year can't possibly happen again, if only because it was practically impossible in the first place.
There's an old saying in baseball -- that you're only as good as your record.

But not in the Indians' case.

It's never safe to say how many games a team should have won. But based just on their run differential, which is almost always a reliable barometer, the 2006 Indians should have been a 90-win kind of team -- not a 78-win kind of team.

How hard is it to outscore your opponents by 88 runs and still have a losing record?

Well, no other team in history had ever done it. So we wondered what a "normal" team's record would have been in a season like that. We found 11 other teams in the last decade that outscored the opposition by 85-100 runs. They averaged 93 wins.

Using a variation of Bill James' Pythagorean Theorem of win expectancy, the Indians calculated they should have won 90 games last year in a "normal" season. By Baseball Prospectus' calculations, they should have won 88-89 games. But no matter how many they should have won, it's still clear they had one of the flukiest years ever.

"It was a strange year," Hafner says. "We could lose 4-2 and 5-2, and then win 12-1 with the best of them. … But you know those games where you'd make a couple of errors and leave some guys on base, and then you'd still come back and win and you'd say, 'We had no business winning that game?' We didn't have many of those games. And that was the difference between last year and two years ago."

That's also the difference that shows up in the record, not in the calculations. So even though we're pretty sure the Indians won't be allowed to play this year's schedule on their calculators, it would be off-the-charts unheard of for them to underperform their talent level by that humongous a margin again this year.

"I hope so," Shapiro says. "But we can't rest on that in this job. We've got to keep trying to get better. And I think we have."


2. The law of bullpen averages
How bad was this team's bullpen last season?
"We only had 24 saves as a team," manager Eric Wedge says. "I mean, you've gotta be kidding me."

"We weren't just bad," Shapiro says. "We were historically bad."

Well, they were bad enough to blow almost as many saves (21) as they converted. Bad enough that they lost 16 games they led after six innings, nine games they led after seven innings, and seven games they led going into the ninth. Bad enough to lose 17 games in the other team's final at-bat. Bad enough that Baseball Prospectus ranked that bullpen in the bottom 3 percent of all bullpens since 1959.


"We weren't just bad. We were historically bad [last season]."
-- Indians GM Mark ShapiroSo that's pretty freaking bad. And pretty freaking tough to fix, too, in a winter that wasn't real conducive to making massive bullpen renovations.

But the Indians did sign the only reliever with more than 10 saves last year to change teams: Joe Borowski. They also signed Roberto Hernandez and left-hander Aaron Fultz. And for a few weeks there, they also thought they'd reeled in Keith Foulke, who would have given them another late-inning option if he hadn't U-turned and retired before camp opened.

So are they significantly better? Well, Borowski is no Mariano Rivera clone, and he did "fail" a physical in Philadelphia over the winter. But he is fearless. Hernandez, meanwhile, is 42 years old, but he's coming off his two best seasons in a decade. And Fultz has had an ERA over 4.50 in six of his seven big league seasons, but he was tremendous two years ago in Philadelphia.

At the very least, those additions buy the Indians' young arms more time. And whatever happens, the law of bullpen averages is in this team's favor, because just about nobody's bullpen is ever what you think it will be, or what it was the year before.

"Until we play games and we close them out, I'm always going to have a sense of anxiety about this," Shapiro admits, "just because of what we've been through the last three years: From bad bullpen [in 2004] to the best in the league [in 2005] to horrific bullpen [last season]. … So I'm confident our bullpen will be better. It's just a matter of how much better."


3. The zig-zags of progress
In 2004, the Indians went from 68 wins to 80. In 2005, they went from 80 wins to 93. So no wonder people looked at that graph last March and thought 2006 had to be their year.
But all those people forgot something: Progress isn't measured in a straight line. Baseball doesn't work that way. Life doesn't work that way.

"We made such a steady climb from '03 to '04 to '05," Wedge says, "that … for us to have gotten it done last year would have been a hell of a story -- but maybe somewhat unrealistic."

And he's exactly right. If you aspire to be a realist, you should know that recent history is full of examples of "teams on the rise" that mysteriously had "one of those years."

The Twins of this decade had three straight seasons (2002-04) of 90 wins or more, then a dip two years ago to 83, then a boomerang back to 96 last season. The Indians of the mid-90s won 100 games in 1995 and 99 games in '96, dropped to 86 and 89 the next two years, then won 97 in 1999.

Or maybe the best example is a team that Tigers manager Jim Leyland said last year's Indians reminded him of: Leyland's own 1989 Pirates.

His '88 team had battled the Mets into mid-September. Then the '89 team disintegrated into a 74-game winner. But that was just a glitch in the progress of a club that was about to win three straight division titles. Leyland told Wedge himself he could see these Indians following the same script.

"You know, there are things you have to go through to become the team you're going to be," Wedge says. "And I think last year was part of that."


4. The defense department
It wasn't as if the bullpen was the only culprit in this team's demise last season. Infield defense was the coconspirator, on a club that ranked next-to-last in the AL in fielding percentage and allowed the most unearned runs (84) in the whole sport.
But this season, the often-spectacular Andy Marte will be the third baseman from day one, and he's a clear defensive upgrade from last year's Opening Day third baseman, Aaron Boone.

Ditto for the new second baseman, ex-Padre Josh Barfield. And shortstop Jhonny Peralta came to camp "on a mission," Shapiro says, to prove he's the player he appeared to be two years ago, and not the all-around disappointment he was last season.

"He doesn't need to reinvent himself," the GM says. "He just needs to be closer to the guy he was in '05. And this spring, he's been among the bright spots on our entire team."

This is a team with only one strikeout pitcher (C.C. Sabathia) in the rotation, and a catcher (Victor Martinez) who threw out just 16 of 116 base stealers last year. So if this group does play better defense, as expected, that's more than just a bonus. It's a necessity.


5. Follow the leader
Not all of a team's problems show up in the numbers. And the 2006 Indians were no different. They were, in some ways, victims of their own expectations.


AP Photo/David J. Phillip
Travis Hafner has averaged just over 111 RBI per year over the last three seasons."I think we came out of spring training, and there was so much emphasis on Game 1, the first series, the first month, instead of just respecting the length of the season," Wedge says. "And I think a lot of that comes from expectations, instead of going out and just playing."

When the powers that be analyzed what happened to this team, one quality they decided it lacked was players who had been part of clubs that handled those expectations. So when the Indians went out this winter and signed Trot Nixon and David Dellucci, it wasn't just for them to be platoon outfielders, but also voices of veteran wisdom.

"When we look at the variables of free agents and slot guys," Shapiro says, "we also give a premium to the fact that a lot of these guys have championship rings, or have been through a lot of battles that our other guys haven't. We felt that surrounding that championship experience, that stability, that wisdom around our players would help our guys get better. It's wisdom. It really is. And it takes wisdom to handle those 162 games."

Dellucci admits that Shapiro talked to him from the beginning about dispensing that wisdom. But when he looks at mega-talents such as Hafner and Sizemore, he says: "These guys are ready to be superstars. So it's not my role to stand up and give speeches. They don't need that. I just think that, as we get into September, they might have questions for guys who have been there."
Indians Prospect Insider: http://www.indiansprospectinsider.com/
Image
User avatar
consigliere
 
Posts: 10822
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: Painesville Twp, OH
Favorite Player: Jeff Stevens
Least Favorite Player: Carl Willis

Unread postby Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:10 pm

Great article by Stark. Right now the Tribe is the front page story on ESPN.com with a picture of Pronk and Grady featuring. The caption reads "Any lineup with Travis Hafner and Grady Sizemore in it has a shot, right?" There's also a video of Stark about keeping an eye on Sowers. Sowers is upfront about people only being able to talk about his intelligence - he clearly knows he won't strike guys out or throw a fastball by them.

I tend to agree seeing as both of those guys are some of the best hitters in the game today. This lineup has the potential to be insanely good.

There's also one thing that Stark didn't mention: Jason Johnson. The guy started 14 games for us and went 3-8. I think the #5 starter has been improved this season to go with the bullpen and the defense.

IMHO, there's the potential for an even greater run differential this year. That's why I think this team will win 97 and I believe they can crack 100. They might not, but the tools are there. It's not like suggesting the D-Rays or Royals can do it.
Mr. MacPhisto
Troll
 
Posts: 3925
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:39 pm
Location: Tampa, FL
Favorite Player: LeBron James
Least Favorite Player: A.J. Pierzynski

Unread postby furls » Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:52 pm

This lineup has the potential to be insanely good.


Some of the guys in the line up are good, but I am not sure that the line up as a whole is going to be "insanely good."

WHile I love Hafner and Sizemore, and most teams will be hard pressed to get the production out of a catcher that the Indians will out of Vic the Stick, there are some serious problems with this team.

Casey Blake will never hit like a first baseman (or right fielder). We have no production at the plate out of the corner outfielders, and right now the Indians are counting on two guys (Barfield and Marte) who are in their second season. Barfield was pretty good at the plate last year, but Marte was a train wreck, I am going to nickname him the rally-breaker. Garko hit well last year, but appears poised to be platooned, making 1/2 as effective.
Coming from a Wolverine, we're the football equivalent of a formerly abused wife of a meth addict who just remarried the safe nice guy. We're just glad we have someone who's aware that it's a rivalry and that tackling on defense is integral. Baby steps.

-Kingpin74
User avatar
furls
Buckeye Insider
 
Posts: 6426
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:33 pm
Favorite Player: Chic Harley
Least Favorite Player: Desmond Howard

Unread postby swerb » Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:23 pm

Great column. Stark is the best sportswriter out there right now IMO.
User avatar
swerb
JoBu's bee-yotch
 
Posts: 17918
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Twinsburg, OH
Favorite Player: Mango Hab
Least Favorite Player: Bob LaMonte

Unread postby Mr. MacPhisto » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:03 am

Swerb wrote:Great column. Stark is the best sportswriter out there right now IMO.


I thought Buff was the best sportswriter. ;) Just my opinion. Stark doesn't make me almost crap my pants with every column he writes.

I think it's awesome that the Tribe got a national write-up as detailed as that one. I also think it's sad that the national media seems to think more highly of the Tribe than Cleveland fans do. One thing about the average Cleveland fan, they rarely overrate players. Hard life lessons have taught them otherwise. It's both a blessing and a curse.
Mr. MacPhisto
Troll
 
Posts: 3925
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:39 pm
Location: Tampa, FL
Favorite Player: LeBron James
Least Favorite Player: A.J. Pierzynski

Unread postby rawdawgexpress » Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:02 pm

Stark:

"Well, no other team in history had ever done it. So we wondered what a "normal" team's record would have been in a season like that. We found 11 other teams in the last decade that outscored the opposition by 85-100 runs. They averaged 93 wins.

Using a variation of Bill James' Pythagorean Theorem of win expectancy, the Indians calculated they should have won 90 games last year in a "normal" season. By Baseball Prospectus' calculations, they should have won 88-89 games. But no matter how many they should have won, it's still clear they had one of the flukiest years ever. "


rawdawg:

Remind me again why Wedge is still our manager (other than TCE)? He sucks. I'd almost prefer Manual- that's how bad Wedge sucks. I blame that whole Carmona fiasco and much of the other historically bad bullpen problems on "ole PornStache" aka "Sniffles".
rawdawgexpress
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:00 am
Location: Lakewood


Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron

Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 181 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests