Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by MacGregor78 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:41 am
by consigliere » Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:08 am

by mattvan1 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:10 am
by consigliere » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:15 am

by mattvan1 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:45 am
by StewieG » Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:10 pm
by MacGregor78 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:43 pm
by leadpipe » Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:17 pm
by mattvan1 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:28 pm
Define "in contention". Seriously. Because if you mean "playoffs" then I get your point. I think it's laughable cause with Bron and 4 stiffs we should make the playoffs every season (like this past one).is going to be in contention for many years to come
by StewieG » Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:40 pm
by MacGregor78 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:45 pm
by consigliere » Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:01 pm

by Dozen » Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:08 pm
by leadpipe » Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:16 pm
Consigliere wrote:IMO, the Cavaliers may trade one if not both Sasha and Varejao. Yes, they are RFA....but we can use that RFA status as leverage in a sign and trade. Really, these are the only two players we can use to maybe bring back a need in return.
Trading Marshall, Jones, Hughes and Newble ain't going to bring in what we need, nor is anyone going to give us much for them....nor would anyone really want them. To dump any of them, we'll have to give up a Sasha, Varejao, or Boobie.
I don't want to see this offseason end up like last offseason, where we knew exactly what we needed, but did nothing except sign Scott Pollard and David Wesley. That was a waste of an offseason, and had we been a bit more proactive who knows if it may have made a difference in us maybe having the right piece or two to take on SA in these Finals.
by MacGregor78 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:26 pm
by leadpipe » Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:04 pm
by Kuiper » Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:09 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:Good news and bad news for you Mac. Good news first. Pollard is done. The bad news is Wesley will be making $1,750,000 next year. Still worse news is your other back-up point guard is making $6,700,000. So, when you have upwards of 8 and a half mil tied up in back-up point guards, it makes things a bit difficult
by MacGregor78 » Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:43 pm
by pod2dawg » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:04 pm
mattvan1 wrote:
I need a title. We all need a title. We fucking deserve it.
by leadpipe » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:43 pm
MacGregor78 wrote:Snow is definitely killing this team. His salary is just insane. He will most likely be a 3rd string PG next year (I really think we find someone this offseason, Caldron maybe) and be killing our cap
by Cavmanamal » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:49 pm
by jb » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:50 pm
StewieG wrote:No, the stars aligned for this playoff run.
by jb » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:51 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:To be characterized as some sort of "hater" because of not being happy with status quo is unfair, but that seems to be a consensus with some.
by jb » Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:53 pm
MacGregor78 wrote: A one and done title (ala Miami) would not be what I want.
by FUDU » Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:47 pm
One and done beats all hell outta none and none.
by StewieG » Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:09 pm
JB wrote:StewieG wrote:No, the stars aligned for this playoff run.
Bah!
Stew, we were the 2nd seed in the East. We knocked off seed one.
This was no Cindarella story. We were one of the best teams in the east and we knocked off the one team that was better.
We will contend for the east next year.
The issue is what do we need to do to compete w/ Phoenix, Dallas and SA ?
But I don't want to hear all this doom and gloom shit about how we had one shot. We have a window of opportunity that is open for as long as Bron is here. We need to improve some areas to compete w/ teh west, yes. Tait is wrong, we need more than tinkering and we can't stand pat. But Jesus, I can't subscribe to the point of view that this was our one, only shot.
Sure, there are no guarantees. But we'll sure nuff contend next season. And by "contend" Matt, I mean for the enchilada, the Trophy, the Title. As much as people don't want to hear it right now, my perspective on the series is this.
We got housed in SA. They had stars in their eyes and had no idead of what it took focus and effort-wise to play title ball. From what I can tell Mike Brown got destroyed on matchups. But in games 3 & 4, it was a matter of the shitty Cavs we saw too many times this season showing up. We say the team tat would beat the best teams in the Association when we saw them play Detroit, and we saw the team that lost to NY and Charlotte in the Finals. I give SA all the credit in the world. They are a great team in the true sense, and a legit Dynasty. But the facts are we had tons of good outside looks and shot like complete shit in games 3 and 4. They were entirely winnable and we should have won if we'd shot average and if we didn't have end of quarter concentration lapses. But shooting average would have been good enough.
I dunno who said it here, maybe it was Lead Pipe, but it was nuts on. You don't lose Finals' series on the road, you lose them at home. This series should be 2 - 2 right now had we played anywhere near OUR game, and OUR capoabilities, no disrespect to SA. If we were as bad all season as we were in the Finals, we win about 35 games.
There is really no logical reason to be this donw on next year. feel bad now, yeah. Even as big underdawgs it hurts. But this is a 50 win team and a 2nd seed and legit Finals contender. Nothing is over until we say it is over.
by consigliere » Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:22 pm

by FUDU » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:09 pm
by jb » Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:13 am
FUDU wrote:One and done beats all hell outta none and none.
Finally somebody said it.
I agree completely.
Murray Head agrees as well.
by jb » Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:24 pm
StewieG wrote:JB wrote:StewieG wrote:No, the stars aligned for this playoff run.
Bah!
Stew, we were the 2nd seed in the East. We knocked off seed one.
This was no Cindarella story. We were one of the best teams in the east and we knocked off the one team that was better.
We will contend for the east next year.
The issue is what do we need to do to compete w/ Phoenix, Dallas and SA ?
But I don't want to hear all this doom and gloom shit about how we had one shot. We have a window of opportunity that is open for as long as Bron is here. We need to improve some areas to compete w/ teh west, yes. Tait is wrong, we need more than tinkering and we can't stand pat. But Jesus, I can't subscribe to the point of view that this was our one, only shot.
Sure, there are no guarantees. But we'll sure nuff contend next season. And by "contend" Matt, I mean for the enchilada, the Trophy, the Title. As much as people don't want to hear it right now, my perspective on the series is this.
We got housed in SA. They had stars in their eyes and had no idead of what it took focus and effort-wise to play title ball. From what I can tell Mike Brown got destroyed on matchups. But in games 3 & 4, it was a matter of the shitty Cavs we saw too many times this season showing up. We say the team tat would beat the best teams in the Association when we saw them play Detroit, and we saw the team that lost to NY and Charlotte in the Finals. I give SA all the credit in the world. They are a great team in the true sense, and a legit Dynasty. But the facts are we had tons of good outside looks and shot like complete shit in games 3 and 4. They were entirely winnable and we should have won if we'd shot average and if we didn't have end of quarter concentration lapses. But shooting average would have been good enough.
I dunno who said it here, maybe it was Lead Pipe, but it was nuts on. You don't lose Finals' series on the road, you lose them at home. This series should be 2 - 2 right now had we played anywhere near OUR game, and OUR capoabilities, no disrespect to SA. If we were as bad all season as we were in the Finals, we win about 35 games.
There is really no logical reason to be this donw on next year. feel bad now, yeah. Even as big underdawgs it hurts. But this is a 50 win team and a 2nd seed and legit Finals contender. Nothing is over until we say it is over.
I should have worded that better. What I meant was the stars aligned giving us a first round opponent with the talent level (after the injuries) of a team picking in the top 5 of the draft, and a second round opponent with absolutely no inside presence whatsoever (Mikki Moore's good series notwithstanding). Plus, we only had to play one of the top 3 teams (other than ourselves) in the postseason. This team, as it stands, would compete for the East every year, and if it makes it to the finals, would get waxed every year. But this year our run to the ECF was as easy as it will ever be.
by jb » Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:36 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 2 guests