Bill Simmons' only mistake was writing that Game 5 column the way he did. Outside of the Vince Carter caveat in the last paragraph, it didn't make a whole lot of sense. "LeLeap?" A changing of the guard in the Eastern Conference for the next decade? WTF?
One game--much less, the last 20ish minutes of one game--hardly dictates the hierarchy of the next generation of EC basketball. That's just plain silly, and Roger's portrayal on that point is accurate. And there's no such thing as "LeLeap." LBJ's problem has never been the absence of great performances. Had he ever played at
that high of a level before? No. But who doubted that he could? Ab-so-lutely no one. Which is why all those people who followed Game 5 with, "that should shut up his critics" just don't freaking get it. Again, LBJ's problem has never been the absence of great performances; it's been the presence of half-assed substandard ones. And it's disengenuous of anyone to pretend that problem no longer exists because of one great performance, no matter how great.
MJ gets it.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=A ... &type=lgns
The excerpt of MJ's quotes that were repeated over and over again the day after they were made--"What just transpired was something I felt was needed for the league, was needed for Cleveland, was needed for LeBron"--described as "praise" by Yahoo and then introduced as such by everyone who repeated it (the word praise only appears in the title & LBJ's response), was as far as I can tell a relatively empty statement. The NBA needs that from him, Cleveland needs that from him, and he needs it from himself.
Uh huh.
But here's the gem that no one seemed to think was worth repeating:
Jordan, who won six NBA championships during his 13 seasons with the Chicago Bulls, said the next challenge for James is to achieve consistency.
"Making 'The Leap' is where you do it every single night," Jordan said. "It's expected of you, and you do it. ... Not one game, not two games. It's consistent. Every defense comes in and they focus on you and you still impact the game. I think he's shown signs of that."
I don't know what he means by LBJ showing signs of that. Not after the Detroit series, in which we saw the full Bron Spectrum (how
ever did NIKE come up with that multiple personalities campaign anyway, huh?).
But I think we all know what he means by LBJ needing to show some consistency. To put in that kind of effort--not necessarily that kind of performance--every night.
And if Game 5 actually marked Bron turning the corner (why not Game 3?), we won't know if for a long time. Not until we're a year or two down the line and one day stop and realize, "Damn, we haven't had one of those Don't Give A Fuck performances in a long time, have we? I'll be damned."