Orenthal wrote:Pfft I'm back into feh mode. They have a TPE about to be worthless and Hickson and Andy that seem like they should and can be moved at any moment.
When does it actually expire? Is there anything at all to use it on now?
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by motherscratcher » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:44 pm
Orenthal wrote:Pfft I'm back into feh mode. They have a TPE about to be worthless and Hickson and Andy that seem like they should and can be moved at any moment.
by Calis32 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:44 pm
by JCoz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:45 pm
motherscratcher wrote:OldDawg wrote:motherscratcher wrote:YahooFanChicago wrote:I saw this on another site..
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=20170
Well, it might be bullshit but it does make me feel a little better.
Ton of stuff on that link. What makes you feel better?
The stuff YahooFan quoted in his post:
Tristan Thompson's stock is soaring with several hours to go before the 2011 NBA Draft. The Cleveland Cavaliers are considering using the #4 selection on Thompson, the Detroit Pistons are very interested in him at #8 and there are several teams including the Houston Rockets that are trying to trade up in the first round to select him. Many are wondering why Thompson is climbing draft boards all of a sudden, but it makes perfect sense if you delve into the numbers that teams use to project each prospect's potential.
Teams that rely heavily on advanced analytics have Thompson projected as one of the top players in this draft class based on his statistics. As ESPN's John Hollinger recently wrote, the numbers support a Thompson pick. Hollinger has Thompson ranked as the third-best prospect in this class and his statistical rating that takes into account his numbers, efficiency and potential puts him higher than anyone else in the class. Thompson's 16.21 rating puts him ahead of Kyrie Irving (15.14) and Derrick Williams (15.97). The numbers also rank him ahead of some of the best bigs in recent years including Greg Monroe (15.77), Chris Bosh (15.57) and Derrick Favors (15.51).
I don't know if that's bullshit or not, but it sounds OK to me.
by Orenthal » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:45 pm
by StewieG » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:46 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:46 pm

by Orenthal » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:47 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Orenthal wrote:Pfft I'm back into feh mode. They have a TPE about to be worthless and Hickson and Andy that seem like they should and can be moved at any moment.
When does it actually expire? Is there anything at all to use it on now?
by motherscratcher » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:48 pm
Orenthal wrote:Don't foget we still have a chance to rescue this at #54.
by JCoz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:49 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:50 pm

by StewieG » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:51 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
by JCoz » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:51 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
by motherscratcher » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:51 pm
JCoz wrote:Not acting as if E0. Not saying its even a good evaluation. Just saying there is SOME chance that it wasn't an emotionally based decision. Even if its megamillions style.
And again, I still hate the pick.
by swerb » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:52 pm
by Orenthal » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:53 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Orenthal wrote:Don't foget we still have a chance to rescue this at #54.
![]()
I'm going to drink now.
by OldDawg » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:53 pm
swerb wrote:I am loving the new deputy commish ... this guy is great. Way better than Russ Granik.

by swerb » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:55 pm
OldDawg wrote:swerb wrote:I am loving the new deputy commish ... this guy is great. Way better than Russ Granik.
Hey Swerb, hope your ball game was better than the draft.

by mikeperry » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:59 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:59 pm

by OldDawg » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:02 am
e0y2e3 wrote:\chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Sorry ... Wolves had 31 pick from Heat. Then Nets bought 31 from Wolves for cash and 2013 2nd. It's getting late.

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:03 am

by motherscratcher » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:04 am
mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
Nope, I love both picks. I think TT is going to be better than Williams because of his frame and athleticism. Williams is a tweener who had an amazing conference tournament and NCAA tourney game against Duke. Other than that all season he was meh. Thompson has a nice wingspan, a standing reach of over nine feet and a 35-inch vertical. He has the raw materials to be coached up.
It never ceases to amaze me that people, on draft night, determine that a franchise blew it. Sure. Oden was this lock No. 1 or No. 2 pick and the Blazers got high grades for getting him. How did that work out. (Damn, Leuer just went. I wanted him).
Everyone needs to relax. Thompson is going to be an outstanding player. He was effective in a damn good conference, is young and has tons of potential. To talk about how the Cavs screwed this draft up already is silly.
by JCoz » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:05 am
by mikeperry » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:06 am
motherscratcher wrote:mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
Nope, I love both picks. I think TT is going to be better than Williams because of his frame and athleticism. Williams is a tweener who had an amazing conference tournament and NCAA tourney game against Duke. Other than that all season he was meh. Thompson has a nice wingspan, a standing reach of over nine feet and a 35-inch vertical. He has the raw materials to be coached up.
It never ceases to amaze me that people, on draft night, determine that a franchise blew it. Sure. Oden was this lock No. 1 or No. 2 pick and the Blazers got high grades for getting him. How did that work out. (Damn, Leuer just went. I wanted him).
Everyone needs to relax. Thompson is going to be an outstanding player. He was effective in a damn good conference, is young and has tons of potential. To talk about how the Cavs screwed this draft up already is silly.
Definitely hope you're right about TT.
I think that for a lot of people here it is not the player picked as much as what the pick reveals about the hierarchy of organizational decision makers. (That's a thing, right?)
by motherscratcher » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:06 am
e0y2e3 wrote:The wolves essentially traded back in this draft eight times, that was the latest.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:07 am

by motherscratcher » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:07 am
mikeperry wrote:motherscratcher wrote:mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
Nope, I love both picks. I think TT is going to be better than Williams because of his frame and athleticism. Williams is a tweener who had an amazing conference tournament and NCAA tourney game against Duke. Other than that all season he was meh. Thompson has a nice wingspan, a standing reach of over nine feet and a 35-inch vertical. He has the raw materials to be coached up.
It never ceases to amaze me that people, on draft night, determine that a franchise blew it. Sure. Oden was this lock No. 1 or No. 2 pick and the Blazers got high grades for getting him. How did that work out. (Damn, Leuer just went. I wanted him).
Everyone needs to relax. Thompson is going to be an outstanding player. He was effective in a damn good conference, is young and has tons of potential. To talk about how the Cavs screwed this draft up already is silly.
Definitely hope you're right about TT.
I think that for a lot of people here it is not the player picked as much as what the pick reveals about the hierarchy of organizational decision makers. (That's a thing, right?)
Which it total, utter, complete speculation...correct?
by YahooFanChicago » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:08 am
mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
Nope, I love both picks. I think TT is going to be better than Williams because of his frame and athleticism. Williams is a tweener who had an amazing conference tournament and NCAA tourney game against Duke. Other than that all season he was meh. Thompson has a nice wingspan, a standing reach of over nine feet and a 35-inch vertical. He has the raw materials to be coached up.
It never ceases to amaze me that people, on draft night, determine that a franchise blew it. Sure. Oden was this lock No. 1 or No. 2 pick and the Blazers got high grades for getting him. How did that work out. (Damn, Leuer just went. I wanted him).
Everyone needs to relax. Thompson is going to be an outstanding player. He was effective in a damn good conference, is young and has tons of potential. To talk about how the Cavs screwed this draft up already is silly.
by OldDawg » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:08 am
e0y2e3 wrote:It's trying to bunt a runner to third in a series you are down 3-1 in w/ your second best hitter up. It's a joke of a thought process and approach even if they find magic in a hat and get lucky.
No excuse to not go BPA BPA BPA in the Cavs current situation.

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:09 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:11 am

by JJN » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:12 am
mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So I guess I'm the only one who got the exact 2 guys he wanted.
Nope, I love both picks. I think TT is going to be better than Williams because of his frame and athleticism. Williams is a tweener who had an amazing conference tournament and NCAA tourney game against Duke. Other than that all season he was meh. Thompson has a nice wingspan, a standing reach of over nine feet and a 35-inch vertical. He has the raw materials to be coached up.
It never ceases to amaze me that people, on draft night, determine that a franchise blew it. Sure. Oden was this lock No. 1 or No. 2 pick and the Blazers got high grades for getting him. How did that work out. (Damn, Leuer just went. I wanted him).
Everyone needs to relax. Thompson is going to be an outstanding player. He was effective in a damn good conference, is young and has tons of potential. To talk about how the Cavs screwed this draft up already is silly.
by Calis32 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:12 am
by jta1975 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:12 am
by StewieG » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:13 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:13 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:14 am
StewieG wrote:Again, he's an undersized PF, with no post game, no outside shot and less upside than other guys who were there at that spot. He also shoots under 50% from the line. And he's a good athlete, but not a freak...which is what you want when someone isn't very skilled. But he's long, so he's got that going for him.
I'm totally fine with that pick at 22. I hate it at 4, with the other guys who were available.
I hope I'm wrong, I really do. But I don't think I am.

by daddywags » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:15 am
motherscratcher wrote:mikeperry wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:I think that for a lot of people here it is not the player picked as much as what the pick reveals about the hierarchy of organizational decision makers. (That's a thing, right?)
by OldDawg » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:17 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:18 am

by mikeperry » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:19 am
So it was "established" that Vala was the guy all day, huh? That HAS to be true because NBA front offices NEVER engage in disinformation leading up to a draft, right? Don't be naive. It's just like the rumor that the team was going to take Kanter No. 1...these things are floated out there for a reason and, unfortunately, sometimes the fans bite, get all caught up in it and freak out when things do not go as expected.e0y2e3 wrote:No, it is not total complete utter speculation. It has been well covered that he just magically flew up draft boards in the last few days and that his interview was one of the biggest reasons.
It also has been well established that Vala was the guy all day.
If you follow this stuff seeing a shift to take a short cut to get a guy who will play now was made late tonight you aren;t following anything.
Either way, it is inarguable that a last second change of heart occurred and that it was driven by a fucking interview for a prospect who can't score and isn't even the best defensive prospect in the draft.
Call me an arm-chair GM all you want but you're playing the same game w/ less facts.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:20 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:21 am

by daddywags » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:24 am
by mikeperry » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:25 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Acting like I am making shit up here is just fucking ignorant. The reason this came out was to get someone who can play now.
I'll let you choose between the GM being too dumb to take the better prospect that he likes more because he has to sit for a year while you are supposed to suck or the owner making the call.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:25 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:26 am
mikeperry wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Acting like I am making shit up here is just fucking ignorant. The reason this came out was to get someone who can play now.
I'll let you choose between the GM being too dumb to take the better prospect that he likes more because he has to sit for a year while you are supposed to suck or the owner making the call.
Get defensive much? No one is saying you are making anything up. I am saying that the pre-draft speculation, hype and reports are usually as reliable as LBJ is loyal. Getting bent out of shape because someone does not agree with you doesn't change things.

by StewieG » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:31 am
by motherscratcher » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:31 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:32 am

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest