Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by swerb » Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:50 am
by furls » Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:35 am
``I've always thought that if you do things the right way, the money will come, and I think I've been doing that.''
by Guest » Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:43 am
by furls » Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:46 am
by swerb » Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:21 am
by RC » Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:36 am
by Dozen » Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:15 am
by leadpipe » Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:43 am
Swerb wrote:Varejao isn't going anywhere. No chance of it.The Cavs brilliantly comandeered Gooden's RFA, and heres hoping they can do the same here without getting Nened.
by swerb » Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:18 am
Lead Pipe wrote:Swerb wrote:Varejao isn't going anywhere. No chance of it.The Cavs brilliantly comandeered Gooden's RFA, and heres hoping they can do the same here without getting Nened.This isn't serious Swerb, is it?Also, as far as tradeable goes, what do you think they get for Newble or Shannon Brown at this point? And Gooden was worth a Channing Frye a few months ago.Let's not start all the rhetoric back up that we had before the trade deadline. The Cavs are stuck as they are for at least two more seasons. They can change the look of the franchise about the time Lebron leaves.
by RC » Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:29 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:51 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:55 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:I understand what your saying Swerb, it's just that "brilliant" and Gooden really shouldn't be in the same sentence.And, I wonder how Pavlovic feels after the last two coaches of this team had little problem berating the guys game.Lastly, they are stuck with this team. Nobody is touching Z's or Hughes' contract. You can think Sean Kemp all you want. I like to deal with rules, rather than exceptions.
by leadpipe » Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:09 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:39 am
Lead Pipe wrote:Well, I'll meet you half way. True, nobody is untradeable. They are untradeable in the sense of helping the team. In other words, if the Cavs would manage to find someone dumb enough to take Hughes, the Cavs will be saddled with some other expensive dead weight which will prevent them from being championship caliber.So, if I were to rephrase my outlook on the Cavs, instead of saying they'll be saddled with the same crummy players and contracts two years from now, (Snow, Marshall, hughes etc.) I should just say "Two years from now this team will still have crummy players and contracts."
by leadpipe » Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:10 am
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests