RIBrownsFan wrote:I'm not that worried about it. They did what they needed to do in Game 3. We can talk about being a juggernaut and the like, but ultimately the other team tries too and being dominant in the first two rounds meant nothing last season.
If I am reading you correctly you seem to put an awful lot of value on the concept of adversity? Playing through adversity can have a positive impact on a team but @ the EOD the idea of HAVING to deal with adversity is overrated. What is wrong with not going through adversity? Put yourself in position to not have to deal with adversity sounds like a pretty good way to go to me. Plus let's not assume a team like Orlando is not dealing with adversity this post season. Howard is their most important player and he has had plenty of performances that are pedestrian, he's been on the bench with foul trouble a lot. That gives rise to the rest of their "supporting cast" to have to play with out him on the floor, not the ideal situation for that Magic team.
I think b/c of what happened to us last year we over value something like adversity as if we NEED it, like it is a requirement, hogwash. Just play good and win, put people away when you can, the rest takes care of itself. Plus last year was last year, has little to nothing to do with this year, right?