Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Prosecutor » Sun May 09, 2010 11:27 pm
by davemanddd » Sun May 09, 2010 11:43 pm
by krazylegz » Mon May 10, 2010 1:15 am
by e0y2e3 » Mon May 10, 2010 1:28 am

by OldDawg » Mon May 10, 2010 2:32 am

by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 9:49 am
by pup » Mon May 10, 2010 10:43 am
JCoz wrote:I put this one squarley on LBJ. Forget numbers. Dude was awful yesterday. This elbow issue frustrating. You'd think nothing was wrong Friday, but then yesterday, did he even ATTEMPT a jumper? Didn't seem like it...
And he's got to be smarter with his passes to AV. If he doesn't realize by now that dmuping a ball to Andy 15 feet from the hoop, when he and the people defening him have jammed the lane, is a bad idea, AKA a turnover, I don't know what to say.
Just one game, I'm just exhausted from this weekend.
But that was a fucking lame performance from LBJ.
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 10:48 am
pup wrote:JCoz wrote:I put this one squarley on LBJ. Forget numbers. Dude was awful yesterday. This elbow issue frustrating. You'd think nothing was wrong Friday, but then yesterday, did he even ATTEMPT a jumper? Didn't seem like it...
And he's got to be smarter with his passes to AV. If he doesn't realize by now that dmuping a ball to Andy 15 feet from the hoop, when he and the people defening him have jammed the lane, is a bad idea, AKA a turnover, I don't know what to say.
Just one game, I'm just exhausted from this weekend.
But that was a fucking lame performance from LBJ.
One guy on this roster that would start on any of the other remaining teams...and he is killing us. Word.
Series is going 7. Was going 7 all along. Nothing more to see here.
When we stretched the Champion Celtics to 7 games a couple years ago it was because of heart and desire and all that jazz. Now that those roles have reversed, we are in panic mode.
by FUDU » Mon May 10, 2010 10:56 am
by pup » Mon May 10, 2010 11:16 am
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:JCoz wrote:I put this one squarley on LBJ. Forget numbers. Dude was awful yesterday. This elbow issue frustrating. You'd think nothing was wrong Friday, but then yesterday, did he even ATTEMPT a jumper? Didn't seem like it...
And he's got to be smarter with his passes to AV. If he doesn't realize by now that dmuping a ball to Andy 15 feet from the hoop, when he and the people defening him have jammed the lane, is a bad idea, AKA a turnover, I don't know what to say.
Just one game, I'm just exhausted from this weekend.
But that was a fucking lame performance from LBJ.
One guy on this roster that would start on any of the other remaining teams...and he is killing us. Word.
Series is going 7. Was going 7 all along. Nothing more to see here.
When we stretched the Champion Celtics to 7 games a couple years ago it was because of heart and desire and all that jazz. Now that those roles have reversed, we are in panic mode.
I am not paniced in any sense of the word.
So again, I'll state it.
LBJ's performance was lame as fuck yesterday.
BTW, its also pretty lame that you think pointing out that he's the best player on the planet means he gets a pass on any critcism.
by aoxo1 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:19 am
JCoz wrote:I put this one squarley on LBJ. Forget numbers. Dude was awful yesterday. This elbow issue frustrating. You'd think nothing was wrong Friday, but then yesterday, did he even ATTEMPT a jumper? Didn't seem like it...
And he's got to be smarter with his passes to AV. If he doesn't realize by now that dmuping a ball to Andy 15 feet from the hoop, when he and the people defening him have jammed the lane, is a bad idea, AKA a turnover, I don't know what to say.
Just one game, I'm just exhausted from this weekend.
But that was a fucking lame performance from LBJ.
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:21 am
by aoxo1 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:22 am
by fundamentals » Mon May 10, 2010 11:24 am
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:29 am
fundamentals wrote:I want the MVP to guard Rondo at all times. The End.
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 11:35 am
OldDawg wrote:My takes:
1) Rondo. Are you serious? Rondo can do that to us? We are making him look like a hall of famer!
2) We spend all off-season signing 50 long defenders so we can match up with the Magic and Lakers, and we can't guard one quick guy?
3) The Cs have played much better team D than the Cavs on the series.
4) Mo Williams can't defend. So if he's not a huge plus on offense, what is he doing for us? He certainly can't distribute. He looked horrible trying to penetrate to create for teammates. His TO trying to do just that in the last minute was a back breaker.
5) Team tries to many thread-the-needle ooh-aah passes... TOs.
6) Jamo is horrible on D. His off ball understanding, spacing, footwork, reaction etc, are very bad. And did I mention that he is soft?
7) Pierce is basically a bust all series, and we can't crush these guys?
8) ANY team that turns it on and off like this will find it virtually impossible to win the whole thing. The Magic, Lakers, and Suns will be sitting back eating popcorn watching the number one seed in all of the NBA trying to defeat Rondo and the Geritol crew.
9) What are AV and JJ doing shooting jumpers when we are struggling to score?
10) Refs called EVERYTHING the first 3 quarters and then start the 4th quarter with 3 straight no-calls on the Cs as the Cavs went at the basket.
11) Cavs offense in the last 2 minutes to catch up was very disjointed and playgroundish. "I will drive to the basket into a crowd and get my shot blocked.
12) GAME 4 IS NOW HUGE. Its a whole 'nuther thing to be down 3-2, and having to go back to their place.
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 11:41 am
aoxo1 wrote:JCoz wrote:I put this one squarley on LBJ. Forget numbers. Dude was awful yesterday. This elbow issue frustrating. You'd think nothing was wrong Friday, but then yesterday, did he even ATTEMPT a jumper? Didn't seem like it...
And he's got to be smarter with his passes to AV. If he doesn't realize by now that dmuping a ball to Andy 15 feet from the hoop, when he and the people defening him have jammed the lane, is a bad idea, AKA a turnover, I don't know what to say.
Just one game, I'm just exhausted from this weekend.
But that was a fucking lame performance from LBJ.
I don't know, I seem to remember him bricking 5 3 pointers.
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:41 am
by aoxo1 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:47 am
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 11:48 am
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 11:48 am
peeker643 wrote:Nobody can convince me that 23 isn't pacing himself after last season's melt down in Orlando. Keep it in mind.
Y'all can hate it and disagree with it and do whatever else with it ya want with it, but there's some of it going on. And given the fact that this group that can't shoot straight takes its lead from 23, they go as he goes. Maybe one night they'll jump and say, "Shit, we got this one."
Maybe not.
by pup » Mon May 10, 2010 11:53 am
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 11:56 am
pup wrote:How about the three times he ran down the guy from Boston leading the break forcing the guy to drop it back to a trailer only to have LBJ turn around and see 4 Cavs meandering around half court.
Someone else run the fuck down the floor and pick up a trailer. Once. Please.
And everyone's love child is included in those meandering.
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 11:56 am
JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:Nobody can convince me that 23 isn't pacing himself after last season's melt down in Orlando. Keep it in mind.
Y'all can hate it and disagree with it and do whatever else with it ya want with it, but there's some of it going on. And given the fact that this group that can't shoot straight takes its lead from 23, they go as he goes. Maybe one night they'll jump and say, "Shit, we got this one."
Maybe not.
I don't know how you "pace yourself" with a winnable game in front of your face to go up 3-1 coming home.
Glad he conserved some energy for the extra two games he's gonna have to play this series as a result.
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 12:05 pm
peeker643 wrote:
Add in the number 23 is drumming on Paul Pierce's head this series and he's not lacking in effort.
by fundamentals » Mon May 10, 2010 12:08 pm
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 12:09 pm
JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:
Add in the number 23 is drumming on Paul Pierce's head this series and he's not lacking in effort.
Honestly, its hard for me to give a whole lot of credit to LBJ for that.
I mean, its clear that Pierce is fucking awful so far this playoffs, I don't know that it has much at all to do with LBJ.
I've seen LBJ play what looked like tougher D on Pierce before and he beat it anyways.
IIRC, the numbers show that Pierce is struggling throughout these playoffs, not this series.
Could be wrong on that.
by fundamentals » Mon May 10, 2010 12:18 pm
peeker643 wrote:This is true. Not gonna argue that. But IMO Pierce is still dangerous with space and he's had none. Not to mention that the foul trouble he's been in as a result of him being on James has taken away any flow and rythm to his game.
So the question is would you throw 23 on Rondo and see what came of it? Knowing that Rondo is quicker and that likely leaves Parker on Pierce? Or do you play it straight up Tuesday as they have and hope for a better result?
by aoxo1 » Mon May 10, 2010 12:20 pm
by Doc » Mon May 10, 2010 12:20 pm
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 12:22 pm
peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:
Add in the number 23 is drumming on Paul Pierce's head this series and he's not lacking in effort.
Honestly, its hard for me to give a whole lot of credit to LBJ for that.
I mean, its clear that Pierce is fucking awful so far this playoffs, I don't know that it has much at all to do with LBJ.
I've seen LBJ play what looked like tougher D on Pierce before and he beat it anyways.
IIRC, the numbers show that Pierce is struggling throughout these playoffs, not this series.
Could be wrong on that.
This is true. Not gonna argue that. But IMO Pierce is still dangerous with space and he's had none. Not to mention that the foul trouble he's been in as a result of him being on James has taken away any flow and rythm to his game.
So the question is would you throw 23 on Rondo and see what came of it? Knowing that Rondo is quicker and that likely leaves Parker on Pierce? Or do you play it straight up Tuesday as they have and hope for a better result?
by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 12:25 pm
Doc wrote:Sorry Peek, but "we got this one" isn't happening here. This team goes as LeBron goes. Add Shaq, add Antawn, add the (allegedly) deepest rotation in the league, and it still revolves around 23. It's frustrating, in a sense. Because, really, what do we have to do to be the best? We can't win if LeBron isn't playing on top of his game. But he has to know that by now, right? I mean, that's the crux of the issue. We, as fans, know that if LeBron isn't being aggressive in all offensive aspects of his game on any given night, we're looking at a long night.
Look, I'm not going to blame him for game 2 or game 4. Without 23, we're not here. We know that. I'm sure we'll see that game 3 intensity out of him tomorrow night, and I fully expect to be headed back to Boston up 3-2. But, we're at a point where we can't have games like that from him anymore. I hate that I'm bitching about a near trip-dub. But, if you want the ring, go get it. 23 is that good. No, he can't beat Orlando and LA (or even Boston) all by himself. But when you're the best in the league and the rest of your team can't make a goddamned shot, well, I think you've gotta take control of the game. That's my gripe today with LeBron. It's been the same since he's been here, and it doesn't matter which other 4 are out there with him. He gets no help, and I bitch at LeBron for not being assertive enough.
Ok, let's get a win tomorrow (and we know Boston is coming strong tomorrow). Maybe if we extend the series long enough, Orlando will cool down a bit? I'm sick at myself for bitching about LeBron, the one and only reason we're here. Confused and frustrated. But far from ledging.
by e0y2e3 » Mon May 10, 2010 12:58 pm

by JCoz » Mon May 10, 2010 1:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:At this point if Boobie hadn't fucked Mike Brown's daughter I'd expect to see him for a few minutes if Rondo is going enfuego tomorrow.
by e0y2e3 » Mon May 10, 2010 1:10 pm
The Cavs coasted a bit, I'm not going to completely put this win in Boston's hands, because Cleveland could have taken this. From the outset, however, they were willing to let this work as Boston's game. Willing to react, rather than create reactions. This doesn't mean they were playing especially poorly, it just means the Cavaliers were allowing Boston to set the terms of conflict.
James and company were making things easy on the Boston defense. James wasn't making quick decisions upon receiving the rock, allowing the Boston D to load up and his individual defender to get into that coin flip situation (shot, or drive?) and hope for the best. If he would have just grabbed the ball and made a move straightaway, even if it meant hoisting 19-footers all afternoon, things would have been different. The Boston D wouldn't have been ready. Free throws would result. Offensive rebounds would have been in the offing.
The Cavs? They have to go quickly, and put Boston on its heels. A home court has a way of telling you that this is your game, but I'm sure you're with me in getting a little sick of seeing the team with the most regular season wins play the way their opponents want them to.
It's a best of three, now, with two to play in Ohio. There's no shame in that, but there is a bit of disappointment in a Cavalier team that has let it go this far. Just once, I'd like to see that switch stay on for more than four quarters at a time.

by Larvell Blanks » Mon May 10, 2010 1:11 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:At this point if Boobie hadn't fucked Mike Brown's daughter I'd expect to see him for a few minutes if Rondo is going enfuego tomorrow.
by Orenthal » Mon May 10, 2010 1:13 pm
by FUDU » Mon May 10, 2010 1:18 pm
by Prosecutor » Mon May 10, 2010 1:47 pm
by FUDU » Mon May 10, 2010 1:52 pm
by Orenthal » Mon May 10, 2010 1:58 pm
by aoxo1 » Mon May 10, 2010 1:58 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 2:48 pm
davemanddd wrote:waborat wrote:aoxo1 wrote: Moon can't get any burn is beyond me.
Question of the night for me
me too. anthony parker got 42 minutes??? really??? seriously??? why??? isn't he supposed to be some sort of defensive stopper on rajon rondo and yet dude had one of the most monstrous triple-doubles i've ever seen from a point guard??? if you ask me, i don't think he should be getting even a single minute and yet he got 42 stinking minutes??? what a revolting development that was. he is by far the weakest link on this team and yet roker continues to march him out there like eric "the genius" wedge was all about his veteran "grinders". excuse my while i bend over and throw up.
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 3:06 pm
Orenthal wrote:but donny all we had to do was hold them to 86 and no one remembers Rondo's game. I don't think 3 pointers are the problem when you go five minutes into the 4th quarter without scoring...
by Tree » Mon May 10, 2010 3:34 pm
Prosecutor wrote:Anybody notice that in both the Cavs losses they were 4-for-21 from the 3-point line? IOW, they hit less than one in five 3-point shots. And most of them were wide open looks.
If "Z" was getting a bit of playing time, I think our 3 point shooting as well as our rebounding and defense would actually improve.
"Z" was nearly 50% from 3 point land this year, and he also averages 2 offensive rebounds and 3.6 defensive rebounds a game, with just under 20 minutes played. He is also typically one of our better free throw shooters.
The two best 3 point shooters on the Cavs this regular season were Gibson, and "Z" both nearly hitting their 3s at a 50% clip and neither one are going to see any playing time.
Another thing I don't get and I sorta understand having a short rotation, but one of the Cavs Strengths in the regular season was the bench. Why not just go back to a regular season rotation, and continually throw fresh bodies at the old Celtics?
All they have to do is hit 8-for-21, not even 40%, and they're right there at the end. I don't know what it is because the Cavs were one of the top 3-point shooting teams in the league this year, but some games they can't hit a 3 to save their lives. And it's never just one guy. It's like a disease that everybody catches at once. And they're too stupid to stop shooting them when nobody is making them. They just keep jacking up those bricks. The Celtics can get away with packing the paint when the Cavs are shooting this badly from the perimeter.
Also, THREE offensive rebounds? They miss 17 three pointers and only get three damn offensive boards? Zero second chance points? Unbelievable. They were outrebounded 47-32 and allowed the Celtics 6'1", 170 pound point guard to pull down 18 boards. Just ridiculous.
Well, they got the split. Now they just need to win out at home and they can move on and get hammered by Orlando.
As for Rondo, I don't know, maybe put Moon on him? Roker did that for the final possession of the half. It's worth a shot because those 29 points, 18 rebounds, and 13 assists came way too easy.

by Ziner » Mon May 10, 2010 3:49 pm
Another thing about "Z" is that he has range on his shot, and he can hit deeper shots than Shaq
by FUDU » Mon May 10, 2010 3:49 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 3:52 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon May 10, 2010 3:52 pm
FUDU wrote:Is Tree suggesting Z should be on the floor shooting 3's in the EC semis?
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 10, 2010 3:54 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 4 guests
