Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:40 pm

by fundamentals » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:53 am

by Larvell Blanks » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:56 am
fundamentals wrote:I hope Ilgauskas isn't given the opportunity to come back so I can watch a board melt of titanic proportions.![]()
Philbert and Doc none likey the notion of Z coming back.
by fundamentals » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:31 am
Larvell Blanks wrote:
Shouldn't you be more concerned that LBJ ran off the court last night w/o shaking hands?

by Larvell Blanks » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:12 pm
fundamentals wrote:I am not here to talk about the past.![]()
Shouldn't you be more concerned with why Tom Veryzer beat you out as the regular shortstop for the Cleveland Indians?
by fundamentals » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:38 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:Your answer is in the upper left hand corner of the card....utility, man, utility!

by Larvell Blanks » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:58 pm
fundamentals wrote:I wonder if he shook hands with Kuiper when he couldn't beat him out either?
Not having Z isn't a big deal for me, but I know others think he is needed to win the title.
by Larvell Blanks » Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:20 pm
"Right now I'm a Wizard,'' he said. "I think eventually they'll let me go, but that's just my guess. They haven't told me anything yet. First I've got to go to Washington, and hopefully after a couple of days they'll let me go home.''
by JoJo White » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:45 pm
HOLD THAT HOMECOMING. Source says NBA has told other teams it won't let Z go back to Cavs. May be woofing with no rule against it, maybe not
about 1 hours ago from web
HOMECOMING II: Wizards haven't even bought out Zydrunas Ilgauskas yet but everyone knows it's coming and NBA officials read papers
about 1 hours ago from web
HOMECOMING III: NBA stopped just one now-common trade-buyout-re-sign scam-when Stackhouse admitted it--may be working on way to make it two
about 1 hours ago from web

by Ziner » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:58 pm
by fundamentals » Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:39 pm
Wizards near buyout with Ilgauskas
By Adrian Wojnarowski, Yahoo! Sports
1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Buzz up! 4 PrintZydrunas Ilgauskas(notes) could reach agreement on a buyout with the Washington Wizards in the next couple days, his agent told Yahoo! Sports on Sunday.
The bigger question is this: Will the NBA allow him to return to the Cleveland Cavaliers?
Ilgauskas’ agent, Herb Rudoy, said he was “hopeful” a buyout would be done by “Monday or Tuesday,” after having discussions with Wizards general manager Ernie Grunfeld over the weekend.
The Los Angeles Times reported the NBA has told teams the center won’t be allowed to return to the Cavaliers, based on evidence there was a prearranged deal. The Cavs traded Ilgauskas and a No. 1 draft pick for Antawn Jamison(notes) on Thursday, and many in the NBA – including Lakers coach Phil Jackson and Boston Celtics coach Doc Rivers – insisted they believed Ilgauskas was always destined to return to Cleveland.
“ ‘Z’ does not want to go to Washington and knows that there are plenty of good teams that want to sign him,” Rudoy said. “He’s going to take his time.”
Players have to wait 30 days before re-signing with the team that just traded them.
Rudoy insists the NBA hasn’t contacted him about any evidence of a prearranged deal, and vehemently denied anything had been arranged among the Wizards, Cavs and Ilgauskas to get the center back to Cleveland for the playoffs.
“I signed off on the document that there are no other deals in place on this, and I’m not going to put my practice of representing players in jeopardy if that wasn’t true,” Rudoy said.
by daddywags » Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:54 pm
by OldDawg » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:30 pm

by papacass » Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:13 am
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:00 am
Papa Cass wrote:Windy's Twitter:
For whatever his word is worth, and it ought to be something, Z told me personally the Cavs had not talked to him about a buyout.
If the NBA thought there was anything not genuine they would not have approved trade. In Stackhouse incident, intial trade was blocked.
This buyout-and-return is a loop hole but a loop hole contenders have used for years. Until it is closed, it will continue to be used.
Is there a good chance Z will end up back in Cleveland? Yes. Was there a pre-arranged deal? Not based on anyone I've talked to.
First time Z learned of trade was when it was over. Ferry did not even go to LeBron before deal was done.
In reference to rumors about NBA blocking a Z return to Cavs. D. Ferry and Z. Ilgauskas, agent Herb Rudoy reputations beyond reproach.
by fundamentals » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:04 am
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:11 am
fundamentals wrote:Part of TCE is to expect the worst, especially since it has happened so much in the past.
Here's my take on the whole thing, speaks to something John Wooden said a long time ago: People like being the "underdog" because if the team doesn't win, it's no big deal. But, now that the Cavaliers have Jamison, they are the "favorite" to win it all, in my opinion, and that's a tough thing for folks to swallow. Wooden maintained he always enjoyed being the favorite because most of the time, the favorite wins, and you want to know why, it's because they were/are the better team. I don't know if the Cavaliers will get Z back, but it seems like we always think everyone is against Cleveland teams and think the worst. Not sure I made any sense......so Cue Chicken Little.
by fundamentals » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:27 am
Peeker643 wrote:
How's this; who gives a rat's ass if they get Z back?![]()
And I'm fine running as the favorite. Give me that distinction every season in every sport.
by papacass » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:23 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Papa Cass wrote:Windy's Twitter:
For whatever his word is worth, and it ought to be something, Z told me personally the Cavs had not talked to him about a buyout.
If the NBA thought there was anything not genuine they would not have approved trade. In Stackhouse incident, intial trade was blocked.
This buyout-and-return is a loop hole but a loop hole contenders have used for years. Until it is closed, it will continue to be used.
Is there a good chance Z will end up back in Cleveland? Yes. Was there a pre-arranged deal? Not based on anyone I've talked to.
First time Z learned of trade was when it was over. Ferry did not even go to LeBron before deal was done.
In reference to rumors about NBA blocking a Z return to Cavs. D. Ferry and Z. Ilgauskas, agent Herb Rudoy reputations beyond reproach.
Sad we feel the need to post these kinds of things.
1. Because it's actually needed to clarify a situation that really doesn't need to be clarified. and;
2. What will people fear and worry about today with this team?
Quick Question- Is a player eligible to return 30 days after the buyout or thirty days after the trade was originally made provided no games were played by bought out player with his new club?
by CharacterIV » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:26 pm
fundamentals wrote:Peeker643 wrote:
How's this; who gives a rat's ass if they get Z back?![]()
And I'm fine running as the favorite. Give me that distinction every season in every sport.
I am on record, I think, of saying it doesn't matter to me whether they get Z back or not.
Ilgauskas isn't a guard, so I don't care about him, but that's me.
We have come to expect the worst.
IMO, You are in the minority with regard to the last comment.
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:29 pm
Papa Cass wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Papa Cass wrote:Windy's Twitter:
For whatever his word is worth, and it ought to be something, Z told me personally the Cavs had not talked to him about a buyout.
If the NBA thought there was anything not genuine they would not have approved trade. In Stackhouse incident, intial trade was blocked.
This buyout-and-return is a loop hole but a loop hole contenders have used for years. Until it is closed, it will continue to be used.
Is there a good chance Z will end up back in Cleveland? Yes. Was there a pre-arranged deal? Not based on anyone I've talked to.
First time Z learned of trade was when it was over. Ferry did not even go to LeBron before deal was done.
In reference to rumors about NBA blocking a Z return to Cavs. D. Ferry and Z. Ilgauskas, agent Herb Rudoy reputations beyond reproach.
Sad we feel the need to post these kinds of things.
1. Because it's actually needed to clarify a situation that really doesn't need to be clarified. and;
2. What will people fear and worry about today with this team?
Quick Question- Is a player eligible to return 30 days after the buyout or thirty days after the trade was originally made provided no games were played by bought out player with his new club?
Come on Peek, you know me well enough by now to know that I don't melt or freak out easily. I'm a big-picture thinker when it comes to moves like this. I try to be a realist. I was the one preaching stay the course on Shaq when he was underperforming early on and we had daily melters telling everyone that it was time to cut bait on Shaq.
I was relaying a bunch of Twitters from Windy because it was germain and I thought the people who read the thread might find them of interest.
I do want Z back. I think he'll help in smaller doses against Orlando, Boston and the Lakers. But I still trade Z for Jamison 100 times out of 100. No question the Cavs are better now than they were at this time last week. That will become apparent as the weeks pass and we get into springtime. And if Z doesn't come back, it's not the end of the world.
But I'm not posting this as a means of calming my nerves or trying to ward off TCE.
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:41 pm
I think that's the issue too. I find it disheartening that people need to be reassured all the time.
by googleeph2 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:21 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:I think that's the issue too. I find it disheartening that people need to be reassured all the time.
Seriously.....I mean, if god needed us to find reassurance in this, why would he give us beer and strippers?
by JCoz » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:43 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Papa Cass wrote:I think that's the issue too. I find it disheartening that people need to be reassured all the time.
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:28 pm
JCoz wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Papa Cass wrote:I think that's the issue too. I find it disheartening that people need to be reassured all the time.
Peek what the hell are you talking about? News is news. Every sports update on the radio is reporting that the NBA is going to block Z coming back.
Whether that's about the Cavs or another team its sports news that people would want to hear about.
I don't know if I just missed your point here, but I didn't tune into the thread and read these posts for "reassurance" I tuned in to find out what the fuck is going on - So what in hell are you blathering about?
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:49 pm
by Shadow Scars » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:58 pm

by Orenthal » Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:11 pm
by OldDawg » Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:18 pm

by Gradysmanldy » Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:01 pm
Shadow Scars wrote:Why doesn't anyone like my word Zarma I made up? It doesn't matter if you like Z or the trade, Zarma still perfectly sums up the last week. How can you think Z isn't important to our success? Who replaces Shaq off the bench now? Andy? Bitch please. You must have a mental disease.
by Cease » Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:16 pm

by JCoz » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:17 am
Peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Papa Cass wrote:I think that's the issue too. I find it disheartening that people need to be reassured all the time.
Peek what the hell are you talking about? News is news. Every sports update on the radio is reporting that the NBA is going to block Z coming back.
Whether that's about the Cavs or another team its sports news that people would want to hear about.
I don't know if I just missed your point here, but I didn't tune into the thread and read these posts for "reassurance" I tuned in to find out what the fuck is going on - So what in hell are you blathering about?
Why don't you fucking relax.
News is news when it actually happens.
The problem is more people than I care to admit have come to accept rumor and bullshit as news.
It ain't.
Show me where there's anything other than rumor and innuendo that this is even being considered by the NBA. Then why don't you go back and check those same sources for all the bullshit stories they threw out there last week, 99% of which weren't even close.
Page hits and sales. That's all people are in it for. And if there's not any real news then the easiest way to generate hits and sales is to make shit up.
I'm not even going to get into the sick and diseased mindset of the fans.
"LA Times quoting unnamed sources....." BOOO!!!
Ridiculous.
That's what I'm blathering about J.
by e0y2e3 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:25 am

by swerb » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:51 am
by Larvell Blanks » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:57 am
by JCoz » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:05 am
Larvell Blanks wrote:I laugh because this "Twitter" report from the LA Times reporter, based on un named sources, caught so much life. The guy didn't even mention it in Mondays LA Times, yet other outlets take it and run w/ it without verifying that it was true. Windhorst even said (Sun night/Mon morn) that if the NBA even remotely thought that there was a deal in place, this trade would have been voided, just like the Stackhouse debacle when he opened his yap.
Everything I saw on other sports outlets cited the reporters "tweet" as the source of this information. Did anyone consider calling the NBA offices to confirm that this was indeed accurate rather than announce it on the radio as definite?
Lazy reporting
by Larvell Blanks » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:46 am
JCoz wrote:This is a great example of how fast rumors can spread and how many outlets will run with it.
The radio reports I was refering to were on ESPN radio (in washington DC), and gave no credit to the source of the report.
My point was that it was crazy for Peek to be penciling in this report and how it spread as Cleveland Fan Paranioa because this was being reported by ESPN radio all over the country. It wasn't cleveland paranioa it was a major mistep by the LA times and many, many other news outlets that were reporting it as factual NBA news.
by peeker643 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:48 am
JCoz wrote:
Peek, when it gets reported on the radio 3 times an hour (I spent 4.5 hours driving yesterday) that the NBA has told teams it will block a move of Z going back to Cleveland due to evidence of a pre arranged deal......no "La times reports", no "unnamed sources"...no blog repots or truth and rumors sections on the internets........the report on the radio all day was very difinitive in what it was reporting, they had it right after a score from the night before.....should I now go check the website for "reassurance" that the USA did in fact beat Canada in hockey on sunday?
So I get that you are all up in arms over people questioning the trade and whether or not the cavs are a worse team now (which is ridiculous), but if you were listening to the radio yesterday, there was no reason to doubt that report the way it was presesnted.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:52 am
JCoz wrote:Larvell Blanks wrote:I laugh because this "Twitter" report from the LA Times reporter, based on un named sources, caught so much life. The guy didn't even mention it in Mondays LA Times, yet other outlets take it and run w/ it without verifying that it was true. Windhorst even said (Sun night/Mon morn) that if the NBA even remotely thought that there was a deal in place, this trade would have been voided, just like the Stackhouse debacle when he opened his yap.
Everything I saw on other sports outlets cited the reporters "tweet" as the source of this information. Did anyone consider calling the NBA offices to confirm that this was indeed accurate rather than announce it on the radio as definite?
Lazy reporting
This is a great example of how fast rumors can spread and how many outlets will run with it.
The radio reports I was refering to were on ESPN radio (in washington DC), and gave no credit to the source of the report.
My point was that it was crazy for Peek to be penciling in this report and how it spread as Cleveland Fan Paranioa because this was being reported by ESPN radio all over the country. It wasn't cleveland paranioa it was a major mistep by the LA times and many, many other news outlets that were reporting it as factual NBA news.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:42 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:13 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:NBA is run by an awful little bridge troll.

by Shadow Scars » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:17 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Good lord.
One game you are playing down 2 front court players because of the trade.
Another one your new front court ace is pressing and cannot hit the ocean.
Next game your top three guards forget that there is a game going on.
but we lost because of Zarma (and Shadow I have seen Zarma dropped about 200 times on the internet already trying to take credit for that annoy as hell term is just beyond sad).
Z has nothing to do w/ what is going on. And as said up thread is not even going to be a major cog in our playoff rotations.
If this Cavs season isn't going to be complete for some of you unless Z gets his ring, so be it, but christ this is approaching insanity.
by hermanfontenot » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:17 pm
If you don't think it's Zarma then you must not understand how karma works.

by Shadow Scars » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:11 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:28 pm

by jack_tors » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:02 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:04 pm
jack_tors wrote:
Thanks for posting Eye, interesting read. I like that after all the examples are given, this becomes "an issue" when the Cavs might be the team to benefit from this loophole. Woj being Woj, all it is.

by peeker643 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:34 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:jack_tors wrote:
Thanks for posting Eye, interesting read. I like that after all the examples are given, this becomes "an issue" when the Cavs might be the team to benefit from this loophole. Woj being Woj, all it is.
Woj isn't the one that has made this an issue. It is three coaches that have something to gain by being dicks: Phil, Doc and Stan.
Woj gave about as fair a write-up on if as you can find here.
by Orenthal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:52 am
by Frank Duffy » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:06 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest