Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Frank Duffy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:25 am
by dmiles » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:16 am

by bookelly » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:51 am
by papacass » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:53 am
bookelly wrote:It would be better to get Jamison without JJ involved. Especially if they release Z.
Z, Shaq, Jamison, V, JJ and LBJ - that's some bigs right there. Backcourt is open all day for 3's at will.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:08 am

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:13 am
Chris Broussard: Sources with direct knowledge of negotiations between the Cavaliers and Wizards deny a report that the Cavs have made an offer (Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Jamario Moon, first-round pick) for Antawn Jamison.
The clubs have had discussions, but no offer is on the table, according to the sources.
Cleveland is still waiting for Phoenix to give a verdict on its offer of Ilgauskas, J.J. Hickson and a first-round pick for Amare Stoudemire. But the Cavs' interest in Jamison is real. Cleveland is very excited about Hickson's development and if the Cavs could obtain Jamison without giving up Hickson, they might consider taking that deal over the Stoudemire deal.
The Cavs have also had talks with Indiana about Troy Murphy, as well as with Golden State about Corey Maggette.
Phoenix has been shopping Cleveland's offer around the league, basically asking clubs whether they can top it.
Miami is trying, and Charlotte also tried to get in the discussions. But the Bobcats don't have any expiring contracts, so they have nothing of interest to the Suns. Sources say Stoudemire would not be interested in re-signing with Charlotte anyway.
There has been speculation that the Cavs are not truly interested in Stoudemire because they have yet to contact his agent, Happy Walters, about whether Stoudemire would sign a long-term deal with Cleveland.
But sources close to the situation say Stoudemire would be of value to the Cavaliers regardless of his feelings about a long-term contract. If things go well and Cleveland wins a title, he likely will want to re-sign, and if he doesn't want to re-sign, the Cavs will be able to use him in a sign-and-trade deal.

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:20 am
e0y2e3 wrote:LBJ + Wade + filler is better then LBJ + anything we have
LBJ + Bosh + Rose + Noah + Deng is insane.

by leadpipe » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:33 am
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:LBJ + Wade + filler is better then LBJ + anything we have
Sincerely,
How Lebron Became Kobe, Kevin, and Dwight's Bitch
There'd be nothing on that roster beyond LBJ and Wade. Nobody who'd stay long enough to matter. (See: James Posey and the Boston Celtics) And you absolutely need those third and fourth guys like Odom/Ariza or Shuttlesworth/Rondo as well as a solid bench. It'd be back to 2004 for Lebron, only with a Ricky Davis that can actually ball. 50, 55 wins topsLBJ + Bosh + Rose + Noah + Deng is insane.
That on the other hand I can't argue with.
by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:57 am
e0y2e3 wrote:LBJ + Wade + filler is better then LBJ + anything we have (I mean a 38 year old is our second option right now)
LBJ + Bosh + Rose + Noah + Deng is insane.
Two max players changes the game and will be looked into by LBJ.
I mean, his refusal to sign an extension is why Ariza isn't here.
by papacass » Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:57 am
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:07 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:11 pm
Amar’e Stoudemire(notes) and the Phoenix Suns are no longer discussing a contract extension, and the All-Star forward was privately telling friends that he believes he’s playing his last game in a Suns uniform on Wednesday night in Dallas, sources said.
As Yahoo! Sports reported, agent Happy Walters and Suns general manager Steve Kerr exchanged contract offers over the weekend but were far apart in talks, sources said. Those privy to the conversations among Suns ownership, management and Walters say they no longer include scenarios where Stoudemire isn’t traded prior to Thursday’s deadline.
Stoudemire can opt out of the $17.7 million on his 2010-11 contract; unless the Suns trade him, they could end up getting nothing for him.
Meanwhile, the Miami Heat are still working to put together a package for Stoudemire, although a source familiar with Pat Riley’s most recent offer says it doesn’t include Michael Beasley(notes). Miami failed in its attempt to enlist the Charlotte Bobcats as a partner to take on Udonis Haslem(notes) in a three-team trade.
The Heat could be willing to take on Jason Richardson’s(notes) contract, which has one year worth $14.4 million left after this season, for the chance to land Stoudemire to play alongside Dwyane Wade(notes).

by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:18 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:25 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)
Shit, I think i'd rather have Parker than deal with that mess all over again.
http://www.red94.net/?p=617

by pod2dawg » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:30 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Well, if you want to get the homer brigade out all you have to do is suggest LBJ is going to at least consider playing w/ Wade or Bosh since teams now can afford them both. I mean, dare infer that two 40 year old centers, one Andy and a bunch of three point shooters may not be the greatest long term team out there and they come running.

by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:48 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:49 pm

by Ziner » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:52 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:problem is reb, reports are Phoenix wants nothing to do w/ Beasley, hence the entire third team angle.
And Windy said this rumor makes no sense, as taking on four players would make Phoenix cut one. Which would not help them get under the tax.
by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:55 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Well, if you want to get the homer brigade out all you have to do is suggest LBJ is going to at least consider playing w/ Wade or Bosh since teams now can afford them both. I mean, dare infer that two 40 year old centers, one Andy and a bunch of three point shooters may not be the greatest long term team out there and they come running. "CHEMISTRY!" "BUT THE SEVENTH MAN!" "WHO CARES IF THE CELTICS PULLED IT OFF!" "CHEMISTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" "OLD PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!"
I am the antichrist for suggesting LBJ is going to weigh his options and this team is perfect because of CHEMISTRY!!!!! (alright, I'll stop, seriously).
Can we just not talk about this.
As for Ariza, get off it Hnat. Guy is a #3 and a damn good one.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:58 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:problem is reb, reports are Phoenix wants nothing to do w/ Beasley, hence the entire third team angle.
And Windy said this rumor makes no sense, as taking on four players would make Phoenix cut one. Which would not help them get under the tax.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:00 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:00 pm

by papacass » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:02 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:03 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:40% the Suns hang onto him (because you know... they're the Suns and don't know how to run an organization)

by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:05 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:40% the Suns hang onto him (because you know... they're the Suns and don't know how to run an organization)
Good lord would that be a cluster fuck. W/ him currently telling fans he thinks he is done there, w/ all of the press and drama, w/ all of the distractions. My lord would that create an awkward second half of the season.
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:06 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)
Shit, I think i'd rather have Parker than deal with that mess all over again.
http://www.red94.net/?p=617
Possibly the dumbest thing ever written here.
No it is.
Comparing Ariza to Sheed? What is so hard to grasp about Ariza being a complimentary player that would excel in a role being occupied by Parker that is trying to be "The Man" right now and looking like crap because of it. Ever heard of players trying to do too much? Well he is trying to do infinitely too much.
He is not "The Man" and would be 100x better served on a team that let him be that defensive stopper spot up 3 point shooter he should be. He should be playing the role of a 100x more athletic Parker, not the first option on offense.
Christ, I need to take the rest of the afternoon off and hope you guys finish your homer orgy up so things can actually be discussed w/ a level head.
Next up: Why Anthony Parker will keep LBJ in Cleveland. That's pretty much the only evolution left here.
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:07 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:09 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)
Shit, I think i'd rather have Parker than deal with that mess all over again.
http://www.red94.net/?p=617
Possibly the dumbest thing ever written here.
No it is.
Comparing Ariza to Sheed? What is so hard to grasp about Ariza being a complimentary player that would excel in a role being occupied by Parker that is trying to be "The Man" right now and looking like crap because of it. Ever heard of players trying to do too much? Well he is trying to do infinitely too much.
He is not "The Man" and would be 100x better served on a team that let him be that defensive stopper spot up 3 point shooter he should be. He should be playing the role of a 100x more athletic Parker, not the first option on offense.
Christ, I need to take the rest of the afternoon off and hope you guys finish your homer orgy up so things can actually be discussed w/ a level head.
Next up: Why Anthony Parker will keep LBJ in Cleveland. That's pretty much the only evolution left here.
You lose cred when you say any take that disagrees with yours is "The stupidest thing you've ever heard"
And really, our LBJ homer orgy is less annoying than watching you stomp around the board like someone took your lollipop.
The only comparison I made to Sheed is that we're better served without either of them. Ariza is a solid role player, much like Moon and Boobie. He has one offensive skill; slashing to the basket w/o the ball or bursting past his defender to the hoop. He's not clever with the dribble or possessing the footwork to get around them. Zero post game. Poor passer. Mediocre rebounder for a 6'7" guard.
Good defender though, which is why I liked him here; for upwards of 6-7M a year, I'm glad the Cavs passed. Moon fulfills 75-90% of the role Ariza would for 50% of the price and much more flexibility. Shit, I think most people can say that THIS cavs team is better with Moon+boobie than Ariza, at the price.
Spot up three point shooter? with a .302 career clip? Please. He hit a few open looks in the playoffs last year and suddenly he's found the range he's been missing his whole career ? Pffbbbbt.
I agree that he's a great defender, and that he's being poorly utilized on a rockets team that is hamstrung by the contracts of Yao and Mcgrady and stuck without a primary playmaker. Brooks is nice and Landry is a good role player, but they're just too short to make a push with what they have.
He'd be a #3 in Houston if they acquired or signed a focal point for the offense.....right now he's essentially #2....but I think he's best served as a 4-5th type option like he was in LA. Wide open looks from range or a defender trying to help off on another player and providing him a path to the basket to cut.

by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:12 pm
by rk » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:12 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Good lord would that be a cluster fuck. W/ him currently telling fans he thinks he is done there, w/ all of the press and drama, w/ all of the distractions. My lord would that create an awkward second half of the season.
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 pm
Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:21 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)

by papacass » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:24 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:40% the Suns hang onto him (because you know... they're the Suns and don't know how to run an organization)
Good lord would that be a cluster fuck. W/ him currently telling fans he thinks he is done there, w/ all of the press and drama, w/ all of the distractions. My lord would that create an awkward second half of the season.
by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:26 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Glad to see my obvious sarcasm and desire to not completely hijack the trade dead-line flew right over your head Hnat. You didn't get a serious response from me on this and you won't.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:29 pm
DiminishingSkills wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Glad to see my obvious sarcasm and desire to not completely hijack the trade dead-line flew right over your head Hnat. You didn't get a serious response from me on this and you won't.
Translation: it was a stupid take, but I can't man up and own it, so I'll pretend I never meant it. Right from page 2 of the Eye Playbook.
Nothing more to see here, folks. As you were.

by Hi Oktane » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:30 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Ariza sucks. Missing on him was even more fortuitous in hindsight than missing on Rasheed Wallace. He's a healthier Larry Hughes. (Slasher that finishes poorly at the rim and doesn't fit the team concept)
Shit, I think i'd rather have Parker than deal with that mess all over again.
http://www.red94.net/?p=617
Possibly the dumbest thing ever written here.
No it is.
Comparing Ariza to Sheed? What is so hard to grasp about Ariza being a complimentary player that would excel in a role being occupied by Parker that is trying to be "The Man" right now and looking like crap because of it. Ever heard of players trying to do too much? Well he is trying to do infinitely too much.
He is not "The Man" and would be 100x better served on a team that let him be that defensive stopper spot up 3 point shooter he should be. He should be playing the role of a 100x more athletic Parker, not the first option on offense.
Christ, I need to take the rest of the afternoon off and hope you guys finish your homer orgy up so things can actually be discussed w/ a level head.
Next up: Why Anthony Parker will keep LBJ in Cleveland. That's pretty much the only evolution left here.
You lose cred when you say any take that disagrees with yours is "The stupidest thing you've ever heard"
And really, our LBJ homer orgy is less annoying than watching you stomp around the board like someone took your lollipop.
The only comparison I made to Sheed is that we're better served without either of them. Ariza is a solid role player, much like Moon and Boobie. He has one offensive skill; slashing to the basket w/o the ball or bursting past his defender to the hoop. He's not clever with the dribble or possessing the footwork to get around them. Zero post game. Poor passer. Mediocre rebounder for a 6'7" guard.
Good defender though, which is why I liked him here; for upwards of 6-7M a year, I'm glad the Cavs passed. Moon fulfills 75-90% of the role Ariza would for 50% of the price and much more flexibility. Shit, I think most people can say that THIS cavs team is better with Moon+boobie than Ariza, at the price.
Spot up three point shooter? with a .302 career clip? Please. He hit a few open looks in the playoffs last year and suddenly he's found the range he's been missing his whole career ? Pffbbbbt.
I agree that he's a great defender, and that he's being poorly utilized on a rockets team that is hamstrung by the contracts of Yao and Mcgrady and stuck without a primary playmaker. Brooks is nice and Landry is a good role player, but they're just too short to make a push with what they have.
He'd be a #3 in Houston if they acquired or signed a focal point for the offense.....right now he's essentially #2....but I think he's best served as a 4-5th type option like he was in LA. Wide open looks from range or a defender trying to help off on another player and providing him a path to the basket to cut.
No, what you originally wrote in no way reflects what you wrote here. I am not going to call this stupid either. I strongly disagree as Moon cannot move laterly on defense and Ariza can drain open 3's, as shared by well, most GMs in the league, the Zen master, etc.
If you didn't want to blow the money on him so be it. W/ his age and potential to get better at his role I would have no problem blowing Dan Gilbert's money.
Other then that, you make absurd metaphors constantly then come back w/ the "but I meant this"
Just stop doing it if you want to stop being called stupid.


by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:31 pm
Papa Cass wrote:The Suns are completely FUBAR-ing their reputation within NBA player circles by handling Amare like this. If you're an NBA star, how likely is it that you'd want to play for the Suns after this, warm weather in February aside?
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:35 pm
As for Ariza he'd be better in Cleveland, LA, or a Yao-filled Houston than he is in his current situation. Still think that Houston spent their money more wisely on him than if they'd brought back Artest.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:37 pm
DiminishingSkills wrote:Papa Cass wrote:The Suns are completely FUBAR-ing their reputation within NBA player circles by handling Amare like this. If you're an NBA star, how likely is it that you'd want to play for the Suns after this, warm weather in February aside?
The Suns fubared their reputation when they started peddling their players and picks as though it were a yard sale. IIRC, I predicted that the Suns would be a surprise lottery team this year. Nash's fountain of youth looks like it will delay that timeline a bit, but PHX is headed for a long, wandering walk in the desert, and it all starts and ends with Tightwad Sarver.
Someday, maybe some of these idiots will realize that if you're not willing to buy the tank of gas, then maybe you shouldn't get the Ferrari in the first place.
by aoxo1 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:43 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Phoenix is an absolute fucking disaster of a front office. The way they handled the Joe Johnson situation, coaching situation, etc.....horrific. It's amazing they've stayed competitive with the mistakes they've made.
rk wrote:That's not going to happen but for the record if the Suns goal was to win in the future rather than be cheap and hope to win it's not a bad option. Amare is primed for a S&T in the offseason where the Suns should be able to get more than a Hickson level developmental player.
by aoxo1 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:44 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:As for Ariza he'd be better in Cleveland, LA, or a Yao-filled Houston than he is in his current situation. Still think that Houston spent their money more wisely on him than if they'd brought back Artest.
Really, Ariza over Artest? are we talking this year or for the next 3-4? If it's the latter, I agree....but Artest was an absolute monster for them in the playoffs last year. He and brooks together had that team performing far over it's head.
by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:47 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Nash has to be kicking himself for showing loyalty to an organization that gave us the great Kurt Thomas & two 1st's for a conditional 2nd trade.
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:50 pm
by Hi Oktane » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:51 pm
DiminishingSkills wrote:I truly hope that the next CBA gets us closer to having trades that are done purely for basketball reasons, rather than clearing cap room or getting under whatever financial ceiling. As a Cavs fan, I love that they have an owner who is willing to spend, and who is willing to bend teams over backwards to get Mo/Shaq/possibly Amare or Antawn. As a basketball fan, those deals kind of suck. Making trades for financial reasons is not a new phenomenon in sports -- if it were, then Babe Ruth would have played his career in Boston -- but it seems more overt now than ever.

by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:54 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Can someone more astute than I am in regard to the financial side of things tell me what the value of Amar'e is if he has no interest in re-signing here. Sign and trade is still a very viable asset, no?
That'd make me feel a lot better about him coming here.
by papacass » Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:59 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Phoenix is an absolute fucking disaster of a front office. The way they handled the Joe Johnson situation, coaching situation, etc.....horrific. It's amazing they've stayed competitive with the mistakes they've made.
Phoenix's FO is a disaster if you don't know what their MO is. Considering word from their owner is to keep payroll down as much as possible, they do an excellent job. Not every owner is Dan Gilbert.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:01 pm
Noon chat at Cleveland.com: http://bit.ly/bRLWz4 I assume we'll be talking about the Cavs rotation & LeBron's shot selection, no?
by aoxo1 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:02 pm
Papa Cass wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Phoenix is an absolute fucking disaster of a front office. The way they handled the Joe Johnson situation, coaching situation, etc.....horrific. It's amazing they've stayed competitive with the mistakes they've made.
Phoenix's FO is a disaster if you don't know what their MO is. Considering word from their owner is to keep payroll down as much as possible, they do an excellent job. Not every owner is Dan Gilbert.
If Sarver owned the Timberwolves or Bucks, I could see more sense in the frugal approach. But he owns the Suns. A team in a desirable location with a long history of relative success and some legit star power on the roster. Even in this economy, the revenue streams have to be there. There are reasons to spend money on that team. It has a lot going for it.
All of which makes the financial and competitive erosion of that team absolutely head-smacking. When is the last time the Suns were really, truly awful? They've always been a competitive playoff team, as far back as I can remember and I'm 30.
Now, it looks like the Suns are on the fast track to becoming one of the league's dregs.
by diminishingskills » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:07 pm
Hi Oktane wrote:Teams wouldn't have the cap room to clear if they hadn't made poor investments to begin with.
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:17 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
