Text Size

Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA

Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Talk Cavs hoops and other items from the NBA here.

Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass

Who would you rather see the Cavs play in a hypothetical finals showdown?

Lakers
16
50%
Rockets
7
22%
Denver
4
13%
Spurs
5
16%
 
Total votes : 32

Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Gradysmanldy » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:50 am

I know two games is an incredibly small sample size, but based on how the matchups tend to go, are you sure that the Lakers aren't the preferred match-up in the finals?
Check me out at Dawgsbynature, where I write stuff, or @twitter as Josh Finney.
User avatar
Gradysmanldy
 
Posts: 1530
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Favorite Player: Melts Parmageddon
Least Favorite Player: The East Coast media

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby OldDawg » Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:56 am

Just not sure the Nuggets play enough D to win it all. I know they have a couple of good defenders, but as a whole, not so sure.
"The nose of the bulldog has been slanted backwards so that he can breathe without letting go." -- Winston Churchill
User avatar
OldDawg
 
Posts: 3794
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:05 pm
Favorite Player: Mark Price
Least Favorite Player: LePunk Jims

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby papacass » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:33 am

The Cavs fan in me wants to see Cavs/Timberwolves. Four games, no fuss, no muss. The basketball fan in me wants to see Cavs/Lakers.

Full-strength Cavs against full-strength Lakers would be an epic series.
User avatar
papacass
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:35 am
Location: Fairview Park, OH
Favorite Player: D. Miles jersey
Least Favorite Player: D. Stallworth jersey

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby jb » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:50 am

If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Ziner » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:02 am

Give me Denver, I want to go.
In the end, we're all "only for a limited time," you guys.
User avatar
Ziner
Tot-Lovin' Hippy
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:04 pm
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Favorite Player: Tater Tots
Least Favorite Player: Yam Fries

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby FUDU » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:05 am

JB wrote:If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.
You've avoided this forum like the plague this season and you're going to drop that take on us now?

Hilarious, in a Mastercard kind of way.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 13349
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby fundamentals » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:17 am

Cue Ric Flair, to be the man...................................wooooooooooooooooooooo, you gotta beat the man, and right now, it's the Lakers. Taking them down in the NBA Finals would be outstanding.
"It's all about winning for me, and I think the Cavs are committed to doing that," he said. "But at the same time I've given myself options to this point, and like I said before, me and my team, we have a game plan that we're going to execute, and we'll see what we get."

"We had a great time together."
fundamentals
Goodwill Ambassador
 
Posts: 2915
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:59 pm
Favorite Player: Mariano Rivera
Least Favorite Player: Rex Ryan

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Ea$t $ide » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:36 am

Spurs - Revenge...
"Meh. Calling me names on the internet is really no big deal, happens all the time." - e0y2e3
User avatar
Ea$t $ide
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:54 pm
Favorite Player: LeBron James
Least Favorite Player: Paul Pierce

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby davemanddd » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:47 am

i would prefer denver only because it would finally give us the 2003 draft class dream match-up of 'melo vs lebron that they tried to promote/hype out of the gate back in 2003 that never really has materialized. the nba so badly wants another magic vs bird rivalry and so they were trying to manufacture one with james and anthony, but it just wasn't meant to be so far. maybe it can be??? we can only hope. go cavs!!!
:cavs1:
dave . . .
davemanddd
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: mansfield, ohio
Favorite Player: joe thomas
Least Favorite Player: lebron james

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby fundamentals » Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:03 pm

LBJ wants the Lakers:

”The championship still goes through L.A., it doesn’t matter if you beat them four times, you still have to beat them in the Finals to take that trophy away from them.”

"It's all about winning for me, and I think the Cavs are committed to doing that," he said. "But at the same time I've given myself options to this point, and like I said before, me and my team, we have a game plan that we're going to execute, and we'll see what we get."

"We had a great time together."
fundamentals
Goodwill Ambassador
 
Posts: 2915
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:59 pm
Favorite Player: Mariano Rivera
Least Favorite Player: Rex Ryan

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby British_Pharaoh » Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:00 pm

Ea$t $ide wrote:Spurs - Revenge...

This

But I'd still be disappointed if it's not the Lakers
"There is but one thing of real value: to cultivate truth and justice and to live without anger in the midst of lying and unjust men"

-Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
British_Pharaoh
Tony Sipp IS HERE!
 
Posts: 9129
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: University of Bristol, UK
Favorite Player: Michael Brantley
Least Favorite Player: Chris Perez

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby e0y2e3 » Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:11 pm

JB wrote:If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.


And our heart crushing loss in the playoffs was just sealed in January.

Thanks JB.
“Irony is wasted on the stupid” - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
e0y2e3
Et Tu, Brute?
 
Posts: 13982
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:41 pm
Favorite Player: Prosecutor
Least Favorite Player: motherscratcher

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby jb » Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:45 pm

FUDU wrote:
JB wrote:If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.
You've avoided this forum like the plague this season and you're going to drop that take on us now?

Hilarious, in a Mastercard kind of way.



I am the opposite of the advice that your Mother / my one time girlfriend gave you. You know, if you can't say something negative about a team, don't say anything at all?

This team is bulletproof since they learned how to gel early on. As long as they don't run into Charlotte, they'll be champions.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby swerb » Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:56 pm

A Cavs/Lakers NBA Finals would be epic.

But you'd have to be insane to be cheering for it. The Lakers are clearly the best team in the West. And they have the best player in the West. And the best coach in the West. And the jewelry from last year to prove it.

I think we could beat the Lakers 4 outta 7. It would be tougher to beat the Lakers 4 outta 7 than any of these other teams in the West.

Bring on the Nuggets. I want a title. Path of least resistance.
"It's like dating a woman who hates you so much she will never break up with you, even if you burn down the house every single autumn." ~ Chuck Klosterman on Browns fans relationship with the Browns

http://www.twitter.com/theclevelandfan
User avatar
swerb
JoBu's bee-yotch
 
Posts: 17876
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Twinsburg, OH
Favorite Player: Mango Hab
Least Favorite Player: Bob LaMonte

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Triple-S » Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:25 am

JB wrote:If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.




Be careful drinking Jobu's rum JB.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.


Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.
User avatar
Triple-S
All-time leader in moral victories
 
Posts: 6360
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Kent-Green, Ohio
Favorite Player: Yuengling
Least Favorite Player: Nati Light.

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby hermanfontenot » Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:28 am

When asked if he enjoyed the challenge of beating New England in the 2006 AFC title game, after all the failures against the Patriots, Peyton replied that he would rather play Oakland. In that spirit, my number-one desired Finals match-up is with the Timberwolves.

But they aren't going to be available, so I'll pick the Spurs. San Antonio would have no chance against Cleveland in a series. Whether it took four games or five, the Cavaliers would end up popping the champagne at the AT&T Center- sweet revenge for 2007, and a passing of the torch from the Spurs to their offspring in Cleveland.

Unfortunately, San Antonio has as much chance of reaching the Finals as Minnesota. There are only two legit Finals contenders out West IMO- the Lake Show and the Nuggets. Between the two I'll take Denver. Better match-up for the Cavaliers and you know they're going to drag John Elway out there in a Billups jersey at some point to sweeten the overall pot.

But man, it would be sweet to meet the Lake Show. No one else in the West compares. Beating them for the first title in the history of this formerly woe begotten franchise would be like losing your virginity to the hottest girl in school.
User avatar
hermanfontenot
History Buff
 
Posts: 4117
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:52 am
Location: NE Ohio
Favorite Player: Big Z
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby davemanddd » Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:01 pm

HermanFontenot wrote:When asked if he enjoyed the challenge of beating New England in the 2006 AFC title game, after all the failures against the Patriots, Peyton replied that he would rather play Oakland. In that spirit, my number-one desired Finals match-up is with the Timberwolves.

But they aren't going to be available, so I'll pick the Spurs. San Antonio would have no chance against Cleveland in a series. Whether it took four games or five, the Cavaliers would end up popping the champagne at the AT&T Center- sweet revenge for 2007, and a passing of the torch from the Spurs to their offspring in Cleveland.

Unfortunately, San Antonio has as much chance of reaching the Finals as Minnesota. There are only two legit Finals contenders out West IMO- the Lake Show and the Nuggets. Between the two I'll take Denver. Better match-up for the Cavaliers and you know they're going to drag John Elway out there in a Billups jersey at some point to sweeten the overall pot.

But man, it would be sweet to meet the Lake Show. No one else in the West compares. Beating them for the first title in the history of this formerly woe begotten franchise would be like losing your virginity to the hottest girl in school.


dig the metaphor, dude!!! :thumb up:
dave . . .
davemanddd
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: mansfield, ohio
Favorite Player: joe thomas
Least Favorite Player: lebron james

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby jb » Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:37 pm

Triple-S wrote:
JB wrote:If the cavs are healthy through the playoffs, and Powe can come back and give 13 mins a game, and delonte is playing, there is no way possible we don't win a title this season.

The Price - Muhownsammich teams were physiclly soft.

These latest teams have been mentally soft (cept for 23 ) .

Now they have it ll together.

Tough, no matchup weaknesses, and clutch.

The title is in the bag unless something like injuries happen.

Championship and Bron resigns. Suck it NY.




Be careful drinking Jobu's rum JB.



I do it myself.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:27 pm

I have 2 words for everyone counting out the Spurs.

Tim Duncan. Gregg Popovich. Tony Parker. Manu Ginobili.

Did I mention Timmy or Manu?
User avatar
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07!
 
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: Brooklyn
Favorite Player: Troy Smith
Least Favorite Player: Braylon/Hughes/Pryor

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby pup » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:55 pm

CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:I have 2 words for everyone counting out the Spurs.

Tim Duncan. Gregg Popovich. Tony Parker. Manu Ginobili.

Did I mention Timmy or Manu?


I count at least 8. But I isn't all that brite.
Home Run Leaders as RHB 5/7/13

Mark Reynolds (10)
User avatar
pup
Closet Shapiro Fan
 
Posts: 12004
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Eastlake, Ohio
Favorite Player: Vince Shubrownicek
Least Favorite Player: Any other coach

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby RickNashEquilibrium » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:00 pm

CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:I have 2 words for everyone counting out the Spurs.

Tim Duncan. Gregg Popovich. Tony Parker. Manu Ginobili.

Did I mention Timmy or Manu?


I said nearly this exact same thing weeks ago both here and at Basketbawful. Don't know how people can be counting these cats out. Sure they got mauled last year 4-1 but Manu wasn't playing, Parker was forced to try scoring 40+ a night on bum ankles, and their bench is significantly better this year. Much like the KG issue w/Boston, SAS's success is predicated on their health. If they can weather the Feb/Mar coastal swings, they will be right there.
"All Beckett needs to do to cap off this mess is order some fried chicken and beer" – 5/10/12 before Beckett got chased in the 3rd at Fenway.
User avatar
RickNashEquilibrium
Beer, Bitch
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Mentor
Favorite Player: Mexican Cooking
Least Favorite Player: 99% of all humans

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby hermanfontenot » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:52 pm

Well, I think San Antonio is done. But I hope they aren't. I would LOVE to see Cleveland play them in the Finals. 4-0, 4-1.
User avatar
hermanfontenot
History Buff
 
Posts: 4117
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:52 am
Location: NE Ohio
Favorite Player: Big Z
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby mrburns » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:59 pm

HermanFontenot wrote:Well, I think San Antonio is done. But I hope they aren't. I would LOVE to see Cleveland play them in the Finals. 4-0, 4-1.


The Spurs are the NBA version of the 09-10 Patriots. A dynasty with big names that just isn't that good anymore. They're totally running on reputation at this point. Watched them get spanked by a pretty ho-hum Jazz team last week.

They might win one series, but unless the matchups really come together and Duncan and Manu start pounding HGH, I don't see them going any farther than that.

Vegas has the Lakers at 1-2 right now. That seems about right.
User avatar
mrburns
 
Posts: 915
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Erie, PA
Favorite Player: Rusty Branyan
Least Favorite Player: Rapist QBs

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:11 pm

You clearly havent watched much Spurs basketball. Tim Duncan is having his best offensive season of his career, along with his usual stellar defense. That isnt "reputation", that's backed up by some insane numbers.

If you watch a Spurs game, you see Manu's hand all over the game, on both ends of the floor. I still feel he's a top 20 player in the NBA (I always get killed for that, but watch how much of an impact he can have without even scoring).

There is still no PG in the league that can slow down Parker.

But even beyond the Big 3, the Spurs are loaded. Richard Jefferson, Roger Mason (who played such a crucial role for them last year and yet barely cracks the rotation now), Dejuan Blair, Antonio McDyess, George Hill... These are all at least solid role players.

Count the Spurs out at your own risk. Popovich has been playing this lurking-in-the-grass game for years.
User avatar
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07!
 
Posts: 1913
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: Brooklyn
Favorite Player: Troy Smith
Least Favorite Player: Braylon/Hughes/Pryor

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Gradysmanldy » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:14 pm

They're included with the other 3 because they play good playoff tempo basketball, are coached well, full of veterans, and because (as previously noted) they are a far different team in March/April than they are in Dec/January.

I think we could beat them, but I don't count them out for a second.

Can't see the Spurs with the Size to keep the Lakers out, though. Do they have any front court depth?
Check me out at Dawgsbynature, where I write stuff, or @twitter as Josh Finney.
User avatar
Gradysmanldy
 
Posts: 1530
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Favorite Player: Melts Parmageddon
Least Favorite Player: The East Coast media

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby RickNashEquilibrium » Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:08 pm

^^^^^What these 2 fellers above me said.

Yeah, they've had a bit of a rough stretch lately, especially with that blowout loss @Charlotte. Still, let them go on the Rodeo Road Trip and then get back at me in a month and half or so. Again, championship caliber defense, Duncan playing like hes 10 years younger, and a MUCH better bench than last year = legit playoff contender IMHO.
"All Beckett needs to do to cap off this mess is order some fried chicken and beer" – 5/10/12 before Beckett got chased in the 3rd at Fenway.
User avatar
RickNashEquilibrium
Beer, Bitch
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Mentor
Favorite Player: Mexican Cooking
Least Favorite Player: 99% of all humans

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby hermanfontenot » Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:12 pm

RickNashEquilibrium wrote:Yeah, they've had a bit of a rough stretch lately, especially with that blowout loss @Charlotte.


It's been a bit of a rough stretch if you consider all of last season and all of this season a bit of a stretch.

San Antonio can't beat the Lake Show- they can't even beat Dallas, actually- and that's all that matters. The only team out West with a chance to beat Los Angeles is Denver. And this is coming from someone who has been extremely reluctant to jump off the Spurs bandwagon.
User avatar
hermanfontenot
History Buff
 
Posts: 4117
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:52 am
Location: NE Ohio
Favorite Player: Big Z
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby aoxo1 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:19 pm

Dallas can beat LA if they acquire someone.
I know more about pizza than you. Much more in fact. - Cerebral_DownTime
User avatar
aoxo1
 
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:23 pm
Favorite Player: Hover Jetski
Least Favorite Player: Eric Wright

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby dmiles » Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:30 am

Bulls put them away tonight, did I hear the ESPN news guy say it was their 3rd straight home loss?
On Twitter @DaBashers
User avatar
dmiles
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:36 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby papacass » Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:00 pm

San Antonio is done as a title contender. They're still a playoff team, but they're done winning championships with the Duncan/Parker/Ginobili crew. Timmy is having another 20/10 season, but he's getting old (34 in April) and his knees are deteriorationg. As a point of reference, he was drafted just two years after KG, who is now the poster child for aging superstars beginning to break down physically.

Dallas is right there on the border, but they're probably not good enough defensively, particularly on the interior, to win a title. The Mavs are a guard/SF dominated team. Their weakest positions are PF and C. Really the same problems the Hawks have. (Yes, *technically* Dirk is a PF. but if it walks and quacks like a SF....)

Portland would be in the WC conversation if not for getting absolutely slammed by injuries. It's a shame, because they have a very nice roster. They have size in the middle and a go-to scorer, but with Oden and Pryzbilla out and Roy maybe banged up for the rest of the year, they're a first-round playoff team.

At this point, Denver is the most intriguing WC team when you talk about who might make the Finals other than the Lakers. They have enough size to play the Lakers physically, they already manhandled the Lakers once this year, they have one of the best scorers in the game and they have a former Finals MVP running the show. And with the Lakers now forced to pay the piper for all those early home dates, the Nugs could feasibly make a run at the 1-seed out west. They're only 3 GB as it is.
User avatar
papacass
 
Posts: 2259
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:35 am
Location: Fairview Park, OH
Favorite Player: D. Miles jersey
Least Favorite Player: D. Stallworth jersey

Re: Poll: Hypothetical finals matchup

Unread postby Gradysmanldy » Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:10 am

My wet dream is watching that decimated Portland roster get the 8th seed and give the Lakers FITS in round one. The Rose Garden is cryptonite for the Lakers.
Check me out at Dawgsbynature, where I write stuff, or @twitter as Josh Finney.
User avatar
Gradysmanldy
 
Posts: 1530
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Favorite Player: Melts Parmageddon
Least Favorite Player: The East Coast media


Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 181 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest