Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by hugerobot » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:24 pm
by tired » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:28 pm
by papacass » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:38 pm
by CharacterIV » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:24 pm
by davemanddd » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:00 pm
hugerobot wrote:let's try and avoid a daveman thread this time
7est nbatv and fso

by CharacterIV » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:36 pm
by papacass » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:51 pm
CharacterIV wrote:Through the first they're playing a little less D than I'd care to see.
Edit: except for LeBron's crazy swat of DeMar at the end there. It was evidently weak stuff, and LeBron politely asked him to relocate it to a different area.
by RC » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:00 pm
by davemanddd » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:00 pm
Papa Cass wrote:CharacterIV wrote:Through the first they're playing a little less D than I'd care to see.
Edit: except for LeBron's crazy swat of DeMar at the end there. It was evidently weak stuff, and LeBron politely asked him to relocate it to a different area.
Oh, that ball will never be the same. Get that weak stuff out of here.
Never had McLeod and AC both drop consecutive catch phrases on one play before.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:10 pm
by davemanddd » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:14 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:19 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:23 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Lazy D allowing these chumps to hang around, they should be beating them by 8-10 points.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:26 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Lazy D allowing these chumps to hang around, they should be beating them by 8-10 points.
Was that Buckeyes score I saw scrolling correct? 40-17 OSU?
by papacass » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:14 pm
by Orenthal » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:16 pm
by papacass » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:16 pm
by Orenthal » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:20 pm
Papa Cass wrote:Mo has a left shoulder injury, BTW. Windy says it "looked scarily like Dwyane Wade's injury two years ago but not as severe." He's back on the bench now. Windy says he looks OK.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:23 pm
by papacass » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:30 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:27 am
by davemanddd » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:34 am
Gradysmanldy wrote:Austin Carr was especially crappy on the stretch run today. I remember 3 separate exciting moments where he got flummoxed and just started mumbling and tripping over the bullshit coming out of his mouth.
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:34 am
Gradysmanldy wrote:Austin Carr was especially crappy on the stretch run today. I remember 3 separate exciting moments where he got flummoxed and just started mumbling and tripping over the bullshit coming out of his mouth.
by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:37 am

by papacass » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:38 am
Gradysmanldy wrote:Austin Carr was especially crappy on the stretch run today. I remember 3 separate exciting moments where he got flummoxed and just started mumbling and tripping over the bullshit coming out of his mouth.
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:45 am
HermanFontenot wrote:Any time the Cavaliers want to stop committing stupid turnovers and giving up wide-open three-point looks, it's cool. They played like garbage tonight.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:49 am
Peeker643 wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Any time the Cavaliers want to stop committing stupid turnovers and giving up wide-open three-point looks, it's cool. They played like garbage tonight.
They seem content to play 10 minutes per night unless someone pushes them beyond it. Like to 11 or 12 minutes.
On most nights it's good enough. But they've also risen to the challenge against the better teams when called upon so it's hard to complain.
It's frustrating to watch because it could be and should be easier. But I personally see a couple wrinkles each week that will benefit them down the stretch.
I do like the fact they're flexible enough with their roster to play multiple styles of ball. I don't like that Schizo-Mo is the 2nd option. Scares me a bit.
by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:51 am

by peeker643 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:01 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Peeker643 wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Any time the Cavaliers want to stop committing stupid turnovers and giving up wide-open three-point looks, it's cool. They played like garbage tonight.
They seem content to play 10 minutes per night unless someone pushes them beyond it. Like to 11 or 12 minutes.
On most nights it's good enough. But they've also risen to the challenge against the better teams when called upon so it's hard to complain.
It's frustrating to watch because it could be and should be easier. But I personally see a couple wrinkles each week that will benefit them down the stretch.
I do like the fact they're flexible enough with their roster to play multiple styles of ball. I don't like that Schizo-Mo is the 2nd option. Scares me a bit.
Why do they always play down to lesser opponents?
Please explain this to me, as i'm no NBA expert.
by Ziner » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:33 am
Peeker643 wrote:
This isn't intended to be flippant or me being a smartass CDT. But I truly believe a big part of why they tend to play down is simply because they can. I think they're comfortable that on most nights that's good enough and there's no need to push the pedal to the floor, especially with memories of last year still fresh when it meant nothing in the end.
They're comfortable with any style of play and they believe they can do what it takes to stay close and win. I see a really confident basketball that's getting more comfortable with each other. I agree with Herm that it leads to sloppiness at times but they haven't been bitten too often. And when they have been bitten they seem to re-focus for a couple weeks until they get bitten again.
They still have issues, don't get me wrong. But I like where they're going and it's hard not to IMO.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:48 am
HermanFontenot wrote:Toronto is kind of a tricky match-up for the Cavaliers, FWIW. Almost like last year's Orlando team except with Bosh instead of Dewey. Lots of pick-and-rolls, lots of rangy shooters. But the Raptors are a horrible defensive team- there's no excuse for committing 15+ turnovers against them.

by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:00 am
e0y2e3 wrote:My boy from LA that is about as diehard a Kobe fan and knows hoops well called tonight, hadn't talked to him yet this season and he admitted to being terrified of us for the first time ever. Said when he saw us on the floor and realized, for the first time since the Boston title series, that a team was bigger than them and could physically beat them up he knew the Christmas game was going to be rough. He thinks it's our year, we'll see.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:04 am
HermanFontenot wrote:Orlando still worries me more than anyone. They're going to get their shit together at some point, right?
by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:10 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Orlando still worries me more than anyone. They're going to get their shit together at some point, right?
But are they as big of a match up problem as last year?

by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:13 am

by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:33 am

by papacass » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:44 am
HermanFontenot wrote:I don't think so, but... I don't really want to find out, you know? I still don't know how we can contain 'Shard if he gets hot.
by papacass » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:48 am
HermanFontenot wrote:It doesn't really matter as long as Mo remains the #2 option in this offense. Mo is bitch-made in the Playoffs and everyone knows it.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:11 pm
Papa Cass wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:It doesn't really matter as long as Mo remains the #2 option in this offense. Mo is bitch-made in the Playoffs and everyone knows it.
Mo isn't a bitch. He does run hot and cold, though. So in that sense, he's not always reliable.
I still think MB and LBJ conspired to take Mo out of his rhythm in the ECF by taking the ball out of his hands. Maybe he still doesn't have a great series, but it didn't help matters to try and turn Mo into a gunner parked on the wing waiting for a kickout.
Mo is integral to the team. Even if he's the 3 or 4 option, if his shots aren't falling, the Cavs will be hurting on some level.
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest