
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:58 am

by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:25 am

by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:31 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:42 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:43 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:47 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:51 am

by g00p » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:03 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:05 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:06 am
by g00p » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:07 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:15 am
g00p wrote:ive been drinking today and watching the nfl... i completely forgot about this site till the end :)
by e0y2e3 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:17 am

by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:27 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Beyond the disturbing reality that is this thread one comment is worth making.
Huge balls by MB not fouling at the end. Good call if you win, terrible if you lose. Kudos to him.
by papacass » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:35 am
by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:00 am
Papa Cass wrote:This whole thread looks like a train wreck. I'll take the blame for not at least getting a thread going in advance of the game. But crap, this looks bad.
Daveman, if nobody is here, nobody is here. Don't post 12 consecutive messages to yourself. Start a game thread, add another comment if you want. But don't treat it like it's a gamecast.
Looks like a Twitter page threw up on Cleveland.com in here.
by Juannieboy » Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:29 am
by dmiles » Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:44 am

by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:59 am
dmiles wrote:I feel bad I clicked in a couple of times while watching it, and should have pitched in helped ole Dave...
Rasul was unconscious there for a stretch and a couple of those threes were ill-advised prayers if you ask me. Aside from that there just wasn't much interesting about the game. I liked the small lineup, I disliked the turnovers.
Not much worthy of adding, which is why I let it go. Beyond that, the D was pretty strong down the stretch. In particular I liked how Andy a couple of times sense the 24 was getting close to expiring, and took away outside shots.
by papacass » Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:30 am
Juannieboy wrote:Yeah Dave...the nerve...... acting like a fan here.
The Cleveland Fan is really a misnomer.........It should be the Cleveland Intellectual. Frankly, a few more drunks here might raise the level of discourse.
by Juannieboy » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:42 pm
Papa Cass wrote:Juannieboy wrote:Yeah Dave...the nerve...... acting like a fan here.
The Cleveland Fan is really a misnomer.........It should be the Cleveland Intellectual. Frankly, a few more drunks here might raise the level of discourse.
Oh, stop it. I have no problem with people being fans. But if a thread looks like a mess, particularly a game thread, I'm going to say something.
Maybe the "Twitter threw up on Cleveland.com" comment was a little too far. I posted it when I was tired and probably a little too crabby.
Daveman, I wasn't trying to pile on you. Apologies for that. I was more irritated by the look of the thread.
by British_Pharaoh » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:48 pm

by davemanddd » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:48 pm
Papa Cass wrote:Juannieboy wrote:Yeah Dave...the nerve...... acting like a fan here.
The Cleveland Fan is really a misnomer.........It should be the Cleveland Intellectual. Frankly, a few more drunks here might raise the level of discourse.
Oh, stop it. I have no problem with people being fans. But if a thread looks like a mess, particularly a game thread, I'm going to say something.
Maybe the "Twitter threw up on Cleveland.com" comment was a little too far. I posted it when I was tired and probably a little too crabby.
Daveman, I wasn't trying to pile on you. Apologies for that. I was more irritated by the look of the thread.
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
