
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Larvell Blanks » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:04 am

by Carmah » Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:33 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:19 pm
Meanwhile Marbury should be called Farbury given how vast the distance seems between his play now and the player he was a few years ago. He went 0-for-2 with two turnovers; his totals as a Celtic are 28.8 percent shooting from the floor and more turnovers (21) than field goals (17).

by jamesownsdet » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:43 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Meanwhile Marbury should be called Farbury given how vast the distance seems between his play now and the player he was a few years ago. He went 0-for-2 with two turnovers; his totals as a Celtic are 28.8 percent shooting from the floor and more turnovers (21) than field goals (17).
He's just savin' his best stuff for the postseason.

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:23 pm
jamesownsdet wrote:Shitbury just posted a negative 4 in game 1 on 0-2 shooting with 3 assists and 2 turnovers. Well, at least his teammaes don't hate him.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
