I have run into some real hard heads in my day, but SD, you by far take the cake.
Pup, he's just getting warm.
So long as ev'ryone can keep it in perspective and not take it personally, we can keep hammering away.
Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by jb » Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:33 pm
I have run into some real hard heads in my day, but SD, you by far take the cake.
by jb » Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:35 pm
by jfiling » Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:07 pm
bostondog wrote:why would anyone have sand in their vagina about losing DA?
Because nobody, including Phil, knows how Quinn is going to play. It's all speculation until he hits the field.
And frankly, it's mystifying why people can't wait to run Anderson out of town for a few draft picks the way he's playing.
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:27 am
HoodooMan wrote:Hi honey , glad to see you want to add your tired little voice to the other girls in the choir.
Now, schnookums, that's no way to speak to your honey.
Philip Rivers was allowed to relax and operate completely out of the catbird seat ala Ben Toothlesburgers Steelers when Jerome Bettis and company bludgeoned opponents with their vaunted running game
sprinkled in with wide open pass plays like garnish added to a finely crfated meal
It would help if while "looking at the facts" you didn't make shit up. In 2004 & 2005, Roethlisberger threw the ball 295 & 268 times in the regular season, about 18 & 17 attempts per game.
Phillip Rivers had 460 attempts in 2006. Or about 29 attempts a game.
That isn't leaning on LDT and asking him to manage the game, and he did what he did with one legit receiver: Antonio Gates. DA has a TE at least as good as Gates and two WRs better than anything the Chargers had last year, including Braylon Edwards who just so happens to be one of the best in the game right now. And while our running game certainly isn't '06 LDT-led Chargers good, it gives DA plenty of support.
Honey.
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:45 am
JB wrote:http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=PASSING&season=2007&seasonType=REG
SD, you do realize that making a huge deal about the dif between Rivers and Brees is, uh, assinine? They Frick n Frack.
by leadpipe » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:47 am
by jfiling » Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:36 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:Rivers is leading his team over a clift in an irreversible tailspin out of the playoffs , while Breeze has righted the ship from yje abyssand is front an center of their turnaround with 4 straight victories .
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:41 pm
jfiling wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Rivers is leading his team over a clift in an irreversible tailspin out of the playoffs , while Breeze has righted the ship from yje abyssand is front an center of their turnaround with 4 straight victories .
OK. Considering that I can't even find a translator online to make anything I just quoted make sense in English, I guess it's best for all of us to either ignore SoulDawg74, or else submit to his transcendent genius.
by Erie Warrior » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:27 pm


by jfiling » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:32 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Derek Andersons playmaking is why the Browns are where they are today , he's the one that has this thing in full tilt boogey .
SoulDawg
by berniefan » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:35 pm
by General » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:38 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:59 pm
General wrote:Thank god for that performance, I was afraid that this thread would die.
by swerb » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:03 pm
by HoodooMan » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:08 pm
by swerb » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:09 pm
by FUDU » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:10 pm
by HoodooMan » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:14 pm
by Guest » Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:22 pm
Swerb wrote:Its insane man .... people are just dying for this kid to fall apart.
by consigliere » Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:40 pm

by pup » Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:49 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:53 pm
Pup wrote:One more play from our playmaker QB is all it took...
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:37 pm
Pup wrote:One more play from our playmaker QB is all it took...
by peeker643 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:08 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:Pup wrote:One more play from our playmaker QB is all it took...
Yep........................
Only thing to do is give him a paper route on the way home , where he can practice long FG's and read up on playing defense to make up for his offensive inefficiencies.
SoulDawg
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:36 am
Peeker643 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Pup wrote:One more play from our playmaker QB is all it took...
Yep........................
Only thing to do is give him a paper route on the way home , where he can practice long FG's and read up on playing defense to make up for his offensive inefficiencies.
SoulDawg
I gotta tell ya SD, I had three paper routes when I was a kid and I never practiced long field goals or read up on playing defense when I was working those routes. I did occasionally double-collect on the elderly and the infirm, but only when I really needed the cash.
I like reading your stuff for entertainment purposes, but you have me running in circles on this one. Was it Dawson's fault, the defenses fault, or the referees fault?
Personally, I'm thinking there was too much fault to actually nail any one person.
I have couple thoughts though:
1. Romeo has been around too long to fuck up the two-timeouts/one challenge deal. Inexcusable.
2. Phil Dawson can't take a 15 yard running start and kick the ball from his 30 to the opponents 15 (55 yards) so to say I had any confidence in him hitting a FG from 52 yards would be a lie.
3. Spiking the ball on the 36 with 11 seconds left is all well and good if your kicker has a chance. But if you check back at point number two, I see nothing wrong with running a couple guys on 7 yard outs (send Braylon to the endzone with JJ running into that zone?) with 11 seconds left. If you miss, you get Phil on the field for his ridiculous attempt with 4 seconds left. If you get 7 yards, you make it that much more possible that the guy makes a 45 yarder.
4. You won't hear me pinning this one on DA. He took advantage of field position and opportunity early and made it count. He avoided the big mistake. He wasn't sharp in the 2nd half but a lot more experienced QBs than he have shit themselves in that place against that team. The kid has learned from evey experience so far. No reason to think that today's game, in that environment and under those circumstances, will not be something he calls upon the rest of this season in difficult situations.
Just my two cents.
by bostondog » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:01 am
...drop a 22 year old 1st round draft pick who has never taken a snap in the NFL based upon 8 starts this year from someone that's about to be a RFA.
by HoodooMan » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:19 am
by pup » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:41 am
Pup wrote:One more play from our playmaker QB is all it took...
by mattvan1 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:48 am
Peeker643 wrote: 3. Spiking the ball on the 36 with 11 seconds left is all well and good if your kicker has a chance. But if you check back at point number two, I see nothing wrong with running a couple guys on 7 yard outs (send Braylon to the endzone with JJ running into that zone?) with 11 seconds left. If you miss, you get Phil on the field for his ridiculous attempt with 4 seconds left. If you get 7 yards, you make it that much more possible that the guy makes a 45 yarder. Just my two cents.
by Crash Davis » Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:32 pm
by Nicastro13 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:55 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:18 pm
Nicastro13 wrote:This game showed us what DA must do in order to reach the next level as a quarterback. Pittsburgh did a great job in taking away his and our offenses biggest strength, getting vertical and making big plays. Anderson has be able to consistently hit the short and intermediate routes in order to be successful, when he was pressured yesterday and moving in the pocket he could not make those throws and it cost us the W. Sure there were other things that played a part, and it is by no means his fault, but as for an argument in this post I think he has to show development in this area before we can be sure he is in fact the real deal. I agree with others to play the rest of the year out with him to see how everything works, but each game gives more and more game film and I am anxious to see how D-coordinators will gameplan him going forward and more importantly how he will adjust.
by Nicastro13 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:26 pm
We have much more work to do as far as improving in all aspects of the team before this season is over, and if we do our job and keep improving instead of feeling sorry for ourselves and bitchin we'll get another shot at these Fucks after the season
SoulDawg
by Prosecutor » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:42 pm
by Crash Davis » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:48 pm
by Spin » Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:01 pm
by Nicastro13 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:56 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:38 pm
Spin wrote:At this point, I want to see Brady play. Maybe for the 2nd quarter, like the Zips do, but let's see him now.
Anderson looks good, I thinki it's because grantham has made a system that plays to his strengths. But the elite teams are able to adjust and shut him down.
I wanna see Brady, and if he's half the player everyone says, we need to move Derrick for some high draft picks while his stock is up.
usually I'm all for havinbg 2 quality QB's, but with this line, the Steelers never sacked us yesterday.
we have the first half of our foundation, the O Line, now let's get some picks and work on the second half. The defensive front 7.
by Spin » Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:21 pm
by pup » Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:31 pm
Spin wrote:Hardee harr harr. Mark that one up to not enough coffee. I wish I was only 12. Life would be so much simpler...
If you guys think that:
#1 we are a contending team this year, capable of getting past New England, Indianapolis, and Pittsburgh,
and #2 Derrick Anderson is a Super Bowl quarterback,
then I say we let Quinn gather dust and cobwebs all year. I just personally think IMO that neither is true.
I really doubt we are risking a shot at the Super Bowl by playing Quinn a few series against dynasties like the Jets and the 49'ers.
by bostondog » Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:26 pm
by Spin » Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:53 pm
by Spin » Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:18 pm
by jfiling » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:56 pm
by bostondog » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:45 pm
I heard that the Browns are working on a multi-year contract with DA.
by Spin » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:45 am
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:09 am
bostondog wrote:I heard that the Browns are working on a multi-year contract with DA.
That's kind of surprising to me. Hard to believe Anderson's agent would pass up the opportunity to test the waters. I guess it's hard to tell exactly how serious any of the parties are about getting the deal done, so no harm in chatting I guess.
by bostondog » Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:29 pm
Not making excuses for DA, butt when the inbred adjusted their defense and set everybody deep our answer on offense was to go to dump offs to Jamel instead of adjusting our response with shifty runners or receiveng threats like Wright or the ghost.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests
