Mr. MacPhisto wrote:Prosecutor wrote:If it's a fair competition I agree that DA starts against Pittsburgh. Unfortunately, the word from the OTA's is that he still has accuracy problems when he throws more than 20 yards. We saw that last year and there's no reason to expect it to be any different this year.
Braylon Edwards said the offense will have a lot of quick passes, which were the kinds of throws DA did well with last year. He might be OK until Quinn is ready. Like one poster said, if you throw out the disastrous Tampa game, his stats were pretty good against a couple of good defenses.
His accuracy problems have been consistent since his days at Oregon State, so I don't see those getting fixed. He's not a guy who can consistently stretch the field. His short passing game can be effective and a good running game, which we might have this year, will be a great help. It's tough for any QB when there's little threat of a breakout from the RB.
In all the games I saw DA, I didn't notice any acuracy issues whatsoever. What I did notice was an insistence to throw to the spot where the WR was supposed to be, come hell or high water. This resulted in picks and was likely consistant with what he did at OrSU. This is alot like how Holcomb got picked so much
DA defiately has the arm th stretch the field and when I got to see him in person vs KC, when he led the team to a comeback win (someone mistakenly posted he'd never turned in a "W") he certainly used more of the field than Frye. Ray Charles can see this.
Pat Mac reports today that Frye is still struggling. He's a struggler.
DA is teh best player they have at the position. Like the last post, I don't mean this as a ringing endorsement of a long term solution, more of a Paul MacDonald in 1984 observation.
Charlie Frye shouldn't be handed this job over a player who has a better pedegree, has more natural talent, and outplays him simply because of draft position.