mattvan1 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:You're right FUDU.
That's all. I have no desire to argue with you or your stupidity right now, or ever.
This board has clearly stated that the parity in the NFL is a lie and I didn't take massive amounts of shit for my stating that last year. You. Are. Right.
I don't feel like reviewing the last 2 seasons (even if it's only about 4 pages back -might have to read Fergus or TW Delaney or p.b. fan) but I do remember Lee's assertion that the NFL was a shitty prodcut. Not sure we ever got into the discussion regarding the necessity of having a HOF QB in order to win the Lombardi, but clearly Lee has held a consistent POV for some time.
Of course he's said the NFL is a shitty product (and said so for a good few years), eye NFL takes and subjectivity go hand in hand. It's directly related to the his love of the NBA in relation to the success and the public's view of the NFL in general. Call it pigskin envy.
As far as the whole thing about team today's needing an elite HOF QB to win it all...that has been part of the NFL conversation for as much as 4 years now. Becoming much more prevalent in the past 2-3 years. What becomes interesting is the debate of which comes first the elite HOF career status or the SB ring? Eg: is Brees not elite if he doesn't win his SB two seasons ago?
As far as the NFL being mediocre or watered down, um, no. It isn't at a historical high level of talent but there is plenty of talent in this league. Hell there might be more talent at the QB position than at any other time in history. There's probably 4 HOF QBs over 29 yo right now, with a possible 2-3 more young ones on the way. Hell 2 of the best 5-6 LBs ever are playing right now as well. The thing now is the impact of trending rules and coaching/schemes can neutralize some talent and prevent one guy from impacting the game in ways they might have 10-20 years ago. Some people see no true HOF type RB or the need for such and think the NFL sucks.