Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by swerb » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:57 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:14 pm
swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
by gotribe31 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:58 pm
swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.

by Gradysmanldy » Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:45 pm
gotribe31 wrote:swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
Of those other 4-8 teams, Dolphins, Redskins are the only ones that definitely need a QB. Eagles just paid Vick a billion dollars, and unless Tampa Bay thinks Freeman v. 2011 is what they are getting going forward rather than v. 2010, can't see them taking a QB.
by FUDU » Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:57 pm
by pup » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:01 pm
by FUDU » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:03 pm
pup wrote:Every time his lips have moved, he has left little question. Patty will call plays. The OC will be hired to set up the game plan and be there to talk to the offensive players during the games.
Not sure why we are so convinced he won't take a QB? Ya'll remember the circumstances that led to them drafting Colt, correct? I don't think he is as much Mike's boy as some are thinking.
by pup » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:04 pm
FUDU wrote:pup wrote:Every time his lips have moved, he has left little question. Patty will call plays. The OC will be hired to set up the game plan and be there to talk to the offensive players during the games.
Not sure why we are so convinced he won't take a QB? Ya'll remember the circumstances that led to them drafting Colt, correct? I don't think he is as much Mike's boy as some are thinking.
IMO the only way Shurmur is sent packing is if Mike himself is going to take over as HC.
by FUDU » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:05 pm
by mattvan1 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:19 pm
swerb wrote:We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:37 pm
by FUDU » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:52 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Barkley is headed to the league, per his interview on ESPN last week I caught at the gym. "My goal for the year was to leave on a high note, and there's no doubt i've done that" or some such nonsense.
by hiko » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:12 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
SD:
Unless we can get to number three , we'll more than likely be left standing with our dicks in our hands as more astute deal makers trade past us and get the QB we need to have if we're ever to become a team to be recogned with.
by swerb » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:38 pm
hiko wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
SD:
Unless we can get to number three , we'll more than likely be left standing with our dicks in our hands as more astute deal makers trade past us and get the QB we need to have if we're ever to become a team to be recogned with.
With high draft picks more valuable than ever and Justin Blackmon/Matt Kalil sitting up there, I doubt anyone has enough firepower to trade up with STL and MIN.
by Lubber » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:54 pm
FUDU wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Barkley is headed to the league, per his interview on ESPN last week I caught at the gym. "My goal for the year was to leave on a high note, and there's no doubt i've done that" or some such nonsense.
Well that answers the IS HE A WINNER question.
Next.
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:26 pm
hiko wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:Colts 0-12 - Luck
Rams 2-10 - have Bradford
Vikings 2-10 - have Ponder
Jags 3-9 - play tonight, have Gabbert
At 4-8: Browns, Dolphins, Eagles, Redskins, Panthers, Buccaneers, Chargers (4-7, play tonight).
All likely to win another game IMO. Our only chance of screwing up our shot at whatever QB we want is in Arizona.
We lose out, we get #4 or #5 overall, and get our QB. And losing out is probably our only hope of Walrus cutting bait on his boy Shurmur.
SD:
Unless we can get to number three , we'll more than likely be left standing with our dicks in our hands as more astute deal makers trade past us and get the QB we need to have if we're ever to become a team to be recogned with.
With high draft picks more valuable than ever and Justin Blackmon/Matt Kalil sitting up there, I doubt anyone has enough firepower to trade up with STL and MIN.
by Doc » Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:10 pm
by municipalmutt » Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:02 am
by hiko » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:37 am
by leadpipe » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:29 am
by municipalmutt » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:18 am
leadpipe wrote:My best guess is, no matter the draft position - if they get RG3, he will blow and Barkley will be great. If RG# gets drafted ahead, he will be great and the Browns will draft Barkley, who will blow.

by trsteve1 » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:46 am
leadpipe wrote:My best guess is, no matter the draft position - if they get RG3, he will blow and Barkley will be great. If RG# gets drafted ahead, he will be great and the Browns will draft Barkley, who will blow.
I do know Lerner wouldn't know either one of them if they tossed a shuttle pass off his head, and that Holmgren will choose the one that fits his "system."
Go Browns.
by swerb » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:36 am
hiko wrote:Stupid Jaguars. Stupid Gabbert, looking horrible enough that Jacksonville might steal RG3.[/i]
by motherscratcher » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:46 am
Kravitz, who covers the Colts for the Indianapolis Star, points out that, if the Colts pay Peyton and then trade him, the Colts will absorb a 2012 salary cap charge of $38.8 million. And if the Colts trade Peyton Manning in 2013, the cap charge would drop to only $28.8 million.
Absent a willingness by Peyton to move the due date of his payment, a trade becomes impossible. Thus, if Peyton tells the Colts “my contract is my contract,” they’ll have to cut him, or they’ll have to keep him for at least two more seasons.
by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:07 pm
Although Peyton adroitly has avoided any discussion regarding the future, plans undoubtedly are being made. There’s a good chance that the final plan already has been crafted, and that the only thing left to do is implement it.
If that’s the case, Archie Manning’s comments from Tuesday become even more significant. Given that Archie caucused with Oliver Luck the night before Archie told FOX Sports Radio that he “doubts” Peyton and Andrew Luck want to be on the same team, it’s safe to assume that Oliver agrees with that sentiment.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:11 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:So when NBA players leave shitty orgs they are Divas but we are okay with Peyton and Peyton Jr. refusing to work together and the resulting holding hostage of a franchise?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:08 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:27 pm
by Triple-S » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:35 pm
Ziner wrote:How exactly does Indianapolis or the Colts get fucked in this deal? Drafting the most pro ready QB since Elway? Sure wish the Browns would get fucked that way. I am not really sure how Peyton would be selfish by saying he didn't want to play in Indy if Luck was there. I would imagine Luck doesn't want to play in Indy if Peyton is there. Either you bench your #1 pick who is the most pro ready in decades or you bench a HoF'er getting paid 28 mil a year. I see no scenario where Indy would like to have both on their roster, regardless of the wants and desires of Peyton.
It is not remotely the same.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:36 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:36 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:54 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Really, how do they get fucked by Peyton making them cut him because he refuses to play mentor for a year or two?
You fail to see this?
The Cavs got one of the most pro ready PGs in the last five years in exchange for LBJ leaving, MAKES IT ALL BETTER!!!
Peyton, after getting that ridiculous contract, demanding where he plays (and demanding that he isn't playing mentor) is every bit the cocksucker move any NBA player or baseball player has made.
You just don't care because it's the NFL.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:06 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:10 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:13 pm
by Commodore Perry » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:13 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:Is someone actually arguing that there are no entitled assholes in the NFL? I don't see that argument being made, personally.
And Peyton really has no say either. He's there whether he likes it or not unless he's willing to forsake all that cash owed to him. If it's really something he feels strongly about then he should retire and walk away from such a horrific situation and all those millions.
I think there are times you're so defensive about how people perceive the NBA that you invent things about the NFL.
Neither of them have a say. Neither is manuevering to end up in NYC, LA or Miami either as far as I can tell.
I think what's left is Manning is a douchebag and the Manning family might just be full of them. This is not a revelation in the least.

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:16 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:18 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:20 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Is someone actually arguing that there are no entitled assholes in the NFL? I don't see that argument being made, personally.
And Peyton really has no say either. He's there whether he likes it or not unless he's willing to forsake all that cash owed to him. If it's really something he feels strongly about then he should retire and walk away from such a horrific situation and all those millions.
I think there are times you're so defensive about how people perceive the NBA that you invent things about the NFL.
Neither of them have a say. Neither is manuevering to end up in NYC, LA or Miami either as far as I can tell.
I think what's left is Manning is a douchebag and the Manning family might just be full of them. This is not a revelation in the least.
Everytime an NBA Star demands out of a shitty team I read about it on this boards.
Manning lays the groundwork and not a peep.
And don't give me the what market shit, it's not even remotely relevant to this.
Manning is the same as them, but no one cares to bring it up. Selective finger pointing.
by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:21 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:It's about selective finger pointing Ziner.
Something the people on these boards have perfected.

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:24 pm

by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:25 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:You just don't care because it's the NFL.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:26 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:31 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Dwight Howard hasn't asked for his release either.
Neither did D-Will or Melo.
Those things are non-actions.
Proceed.
BTW: I love how you try to bring NHB arguments into every post because it's the best you clouded and simple fucking mind can manage to wrap itself around.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:34 pm

by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:40 pm
by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:41 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Really? Do you want to go back and count the teeth gnashing done over those guys over the course of the last year on the Cavs board? Enough to make it intolerable before it just finally died.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests
