Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:51 pm
by jta1975 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:10 pm
by Loo » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:21 am
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:37 am
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:56 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:You need to just quit being a Browns fan, follow your heart and eat 10 miles of Cam Newton's shit just to see the bulbous ass it came out of
It'll save yo angst and relieve the rest of us of your repititous bullshit
We fucking get it
You think Cam Newton is Jesus Christ, la Duece, but for the love of God stfu about him here. Save it all for Pure Boredom @obr.....He will never be a Brown...he's irrelevant
Regretfully I can envision you dishing up this blathering bullshit till the day you die and anyone who wants to read these forums is going to have to put up with this redundant horseshit
...but by all means Kerri on
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:02 pm
Loo wrote:Smokescreens. Nothing new. Just shows you can't listen to either one.
All teams do this, so you can't listen to anyone.
I get this a lot: "Well, if they're all doing this, clearly, the team who says the most negative stuff about a guy is going to take him!"
Me: "Well, what if that's what they want you to think?"
"Oh."
For the record, I hate that "ain't cheatin' ain't tryin'" saying. Absolutely hate it. I'd say no, if you're cheating you...are just cheating.
by RedDawg » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:44 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:45 pm
RedDawg wrote:"You convince me right here and now that 2-6 Colt who threw interceptions the last two games like they were candy, because he couldn't spin it in the cold ,the way our competitors shredded the air ain't the fourth best QB in this division even behind the has been that is now Carson Palmer and you'd have a valid reason to squawk if somebody else suggested we draft QB ."
SD, if Mike Holmgren thinks Colt McCoy deserves a clear shot at the job and Mike Shurmur thinks he's a player based on their scouting information, why shouldn't we think they know WTF they are talking about and trust them?
I understand having reservations about Colt, but preaching that he doesn't have it is asking us to take your word over Holmgren+Heckert+Shurmur.
If he is the man, we'll know soon enough. More importantly, the Browns peeps will know and will make a change.
Patience, grasshopper.
by Cease » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:16 pm

by pup » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:16 pm
RedDawg wrote:"You convince me right here and now that 2-6 Colt who threw interceptions the last two games like they were candy, because he couldn't spin it in the cold ,the way our competitors shredded the air ain't the fourth best QB in this division even behind the has been that is now Carson Palmer and you'd have a valid reason to squawk if somebody else suggested we draft QB ."
SD, if Mike Holmgren thinks Colt McCoy deserves a clear shot at the job and Mike Shurmur thinks he's a player based on their scouting information, why shouldn't we think they know WTF they are talking about and trust them?
I understand having reservations about Colt, but preaching that he doesn't have it is asking us to take your word over Holmgren+Heckert+Shurmur.
If he is the man, we'll know soon enough. More importantly, the Browns peeps will know and will make a change.
Patience, grasshopper.
by danwismar » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:17 pm
Loo wrote:For the record, I hate that "ain't cheatin' ain't tryin'" saying. Absolutely hate it. I'd say no, if you're cheating you...are just cheating.
by jb » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:57 am
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:47 pm
jb wrote:Jus trying to perform a public servce. I know it'll never work, but hey...
can't miss the hint.
by jb » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:56 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:Jus trying to perform a public servce. I know it'll never work, but hey...
can't miss the hint.
SD:
This thread has an expiration date of April 28th ...no ?
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:53 pm
jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:Jus trying to perform a public servce. I know it'll never work, but hey...
can't miss the hint.
SD:
This thread has an expiration date of April 28th ...no ?
nah, you'll be bitchin' about it until they pry the keyboard from ur cold, dead, hands.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:13 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Only if we are stoopid enough to pass on him if by some miracle , he's there at 6 .
or if Homie gets cute overrules heckert and pulls a Butchum and drafts Locker ...


by SoulDawg74 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:44 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Only if we are stoopid enough to pass on him if by some miracle , he's there at 6 .
or if Homie gets cute overrules heckert and pulls a Butchum and drafts Locker ...
They're both chumps. Neither of them can hit water if they fell out of a boat. Don't we already have an awful thread about this guy?
by RedDawg » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:06 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:RedDawg wrote:"You convince me right here and now that 2-6 Colt who threw interceptions the last two games like they were candy, because he couldn't spin it in the cold ,the way our competitors shredded the air ain't the fourth best QB in this division even behind the has been that is now Carson Palmer and you'd have a valid reason to squawk if somebody else suggested we draft QB ."
SD, if Mike Holmgren thinks Colt McCoy deserves a clear shot at the job and Mike Shurmur thinks he's a player based on their scouting information, why shouldn't we think they know WTF they are talking about and trust them?
I understand having reservations about Colt, but preaching that he doesn't have it is asking us to take your word over Holmgren+Heckert+Shurmur.
If he is the man, we'll know soon enough. More importantly, the Browns peeps will know and will make a change.
Patience, grasshopper.
SD:
![]()
name me one QB Holmgren drafted who amounted to anything in his coaching career.
Wolf traded for Farve and drafted Hasselback who Holmgren promptly traded for when he got the seattle gig.
name him _______________________________________________
SoulDawg
by RedDawg » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:12 pm
pup wrote:RedDawg wrote:"You convince me right here and now that 2-6 Colt who threw interceptions the last two games like they were candy, because he couldn't spin it in the cold ,the way our competitors shredded the air ain't the fourth best QB in this division even behind the has been that is now Carson Palmer and you'd have a valid reason to squawk if somebody else suggested we draft QB ."
SD, if Mike Holmgren thinks Colt McCoy deserves a clear shot at the job and Mike Shurmur thinks he's a player based on their scouting information, why shouldn't we think they know WTF they are talking about and trust them?
I understand having reservations about Colt, but preaching that he doesn't have it is asking us to take your word over Holmgren+Heckert+Shurmur.
If he is the man, we'll know soon enough. More importantly, the Browns peeps will know and will make a change.
Patience, grasshopper.
Funny to me that you went this route in a thread that is basically about smokescreens.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:21 pm
RedDawg wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:RedDawg wrote:"You convince me right here and now that 2-6 Colt who threw interceptions the last two games like they were candy, because he couldn't spin it in the cold ,the way our competitors shredded the air ain't the fourth best QB in this division even behind the has been that is now Carson Palmer and you'd have a valid reason to squawk if somebody else suggested we draft QB ."
SD, if Mike Holmgren thinks Colt McCoy deserves a clear shot at the job and Mike Shurmur thinks he's a player based on their scouting information, why shouldn't we think they know WTF they are talking about and trust them?
I understand having reservations about Colt, but preaching that he doesn't have it is asking us to take your word over Holmgren+Heckert+Shurmur.
If he is the man, we'll know soon enough. More importantly, the Browns peeps will know and will make a change.
Patience, grasshopper.
SD:
![]()
name me one QB Holmgren drafted who amounted to anything in his coaching career.
Wolf traded for Farve and drafted Hasselback who Holmgren promptly traded for when he got the seattle gig.
name him _______________________________________________
SoulDawg
Holmgren has never drafted a QB. He's the head coach. It's his job to develop QBs, and he's universally hailed as one of the best in the history of NFL.
If you want to infer that he has a role in the selection process, then Matt Hasselbeck and Mark Brunell are evidence of him being an outstanding young QB evaluator. 6 Pro Bowls between them.
So he has developed at least two Hall of Fame QBs in Farve and Young, and had a significant role in the selection of two other Pro Bowl QBs.
And you have the balls to expect us to listen to your take over his?
Heckert'll take a QB in the later rounds. Start talking about who that might be and give up your obsession with Cam Newton.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:49 pm
by RedDawg » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:10 pm
SD:
Not only are you disingenuous your down right stoopid , .
You talk outta both sides of your mouth like a witless Bitch .
As GM and Coach in seattle , he had control of the draft , which makes your reply .
and I quote """"Holmgren has never drafted a QB. He's the head coach."""
Mindless blatherings from a Jackass.
SoulDawg

by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:57 pm
RedDawg wrote:SD:
Not only are you disingenuous your down right stoopid , .
You talk outta both sides of your mouth like a witless Bitch .
As GM and Coach in seattle , he had control of the draft , which makes your reply .
and I quote """"Holmgren has never drafted a QB. He's the head coach."""
Mindless blatherings from a Jackass.
SoulDawg
Do you have to be a raging, foaming at the mouth old prick every time I challenge your awful takes? You are embarrassing yourself - really.
Ok, Holmgren didn't draft a Pro Bowl QB while he was at Seattle. If that is the basis of your take that he can't evaluate young QBs - then you are making a ridiculous and illogical reach.
As GM of the Seahawks, he traded for Hasselbeck who was a backup QB - that he helped to select in BG - and developed him into a 3 time Pro Bowl QB who took the Seahawks to the Super Bowl. That's the ability to evaluate and develop a young QB. Recognize this fact, please.
I'm quite comfortable in saying that he played a significant role in the drafting of Hasselbeck and Brunell when he was at GB. Brunell went on to 3 pro bowls in JAX, and unless you think Chris Palmer is the best offensive coordinator in the history of the NFL in '96-'98, then I'd say that was a hit by Holmgren/Wolf as well.
Show me where he had no input into Wolf selecting Hasselbeck and Brunell and I'll concede the point. It makes no sense that Wolf didn't consult with Holmgren in the selection of a QB as that was his specialty as a coach.
Holmgren as much or more than Wolf made those picks.
Dude, I respect that you have reservations about McCoy. Undestandable. I respect that Newton could become a legend. It's possible. But in the face of consensus support from a highly experienced NFL front office - your take that Colt doesn't have it and we should go after a possibly revolutionary QB with the #6 pick despite glaring needs elsewhere doesn't hold up.
You're just wrong here. Sack up, admit it, and move on.
by RedDawg » Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:41 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:45 pm
danwismar wrote:Loo wrote:For the record, I hate that "ain't cheatin' ain't tryin'" saying. Absolutely hate it. I'd say no, if you're cheating you...are just cheating.
It's commonly said of SEC football "if you ain't cheatin', you ain't competin'"
...which has a slightly different meaning...and it has the ring of truth too.
by Triple-S » Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:51 pm
Confirmed #Browns GM Tom Heckert and coach Pat Shurmur attending Auburn pro day. Prob on to Alabama next.
Holmgen advisor Gil Haskell also part of #Browns contingent @ Auburn pro day. He's not there to look at Nick Fairley.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:06 pm
Triple-S wrote:Confirmed #Browns GM Tom Heckert and coach Pat Shurmur attending Auburn pro day. Prob on to Alabama next.
Holmgen advisor Gil Haskell also part of #Browns contingent @ Auburn pro day. He's not there to look at Nick Fairley.
per grossi.
I dislike the idea of hypothetically drafting $cam, but if holmgren decides thats the road he wants to go so badly. So be it, and I'll support him on that.
Also from the sounds of it, they also took a peak at a WR Darvin Adams and RT Daniel Zembia, both projected 2nd-3rd rounders
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:36 pm
by Triple-S » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:43 pm
#Browns will research Newton, Gabbert, Mallett, Dalton, etc. Don't overreact to them being at every QB pro day. Will bring some in, too.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:44 pm
peeker643 wrote:I wonder how far under the SEC cap Auburn is with Cam and Fairley falling off the books this season.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:49 pm
Triple-S wrote:#Browns will research Newton, Gabbert, Mallett, Dalton, etc. Don't overreact to them being at every QB pro day. Will bring some in, too.
SD just came.
by pup » Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:10 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Triple-S wrote:#Browns will research Newton, Gabbert, Mallett, Dalton, etc. Don't overreact to them being at every QB pro day. Will bring some in, too.
SD just came.
SD:
More than once , especially over thoughts of the sheep shittin on themselves.
Pay all that no attention their secretly looking for a long snapper :)
SoulDawg
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:21 pm
pup wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Triple-S wrote:#Browns will research Newton, Gabbert, Mallett, Dalton, etc. Don't overreact to them being at every QB pro day. Will bring some in, too.
SD just came.
SD:
More than once , especially over thoughts of the sheep shittin on themselves.
Pay all that no attention their secretly looking for a long snapper :)
SoulDawg
God damn this new regime. The one position on this team that is All-Pro and they are out looking to replace him.
by bucknutz94 » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:09 am
by RedDawg » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:40 am
by jb » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:48 am
RedDawg wrote:Rather than debate whether Cam Newton is worthy, or whether McCoy even has it, let's look at Holmgren's actual words.
"It works best if you can identify 'the guy,' let him know he's 'the guy,' and train him appropriately to be 'the guy,'" Holmgren said. "It's nice to have all this competition and all this stuff, but it doesn't work very well, usually. So if you believe in a young man, believe he's 'the guy,' then you have to go with it."
and...
"I believe in the young guy we have," he said. "I'm pretty sure we'll take one later in the draft."
by Triple-S » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:24 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:10 pm
Triple-S wrote:I could see Newton having success in Chan offense in Buffalo , and it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
Maybe the Bills should go early 90's Houston Oilers for the next couple of seasons. Damn that would kick ass.
Run and Shoot seems to be the sort of offense he's built for.
But, if I repeat though, he doesn't fit the sort offense the Browns are striving for. West cost relies on short accurate passes to the WR's, and a little bit of mobility from the QB.
by hiko » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:48 am
jb wrote:If you read and listen carefully until about early to mid-April you can come back to those quotes, inasmuch as you can get these guys to quote, and not be failed. After that time, if their lips are moving, they's lying.
by RedDawg » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:28 am
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:50 pm
RedDawg wrote:I haven't seen any evidence of Holmgren not meaning exactly what he is saying since he has been here.
Every shred of informatin that we have on his analysis of Colt McCoy is that he is very impressed with him and thinks that he has the potential to be an outstanding WCO QB. We know that Holmgren wanted to select him in the 2nd round, but Heckert asked him to be patient and Holmgren relented.
Now he is very clearly saying that he does not believe in a QB competition, and that Colt is the unquestioned starter going into this season. Spinning smokescreens does not fit his persona thus far. If smoke is to be released, Heckert is the guy to do so.
Exactly what could make it any clearer that this regime is 100% behind Colt McCoy?
Much more of a chance we take the kid from Va Tech in the mid rounds than Newton.
by RedDawg » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:16 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:01 pm
RedDawg wrote:Your unhealthy infatuation with Cam Newton and spamming up every thread about him has crossed over from amusing, to just sad.
NFL teams don't trot out their HOF team presidents to straight up lie just to create a smokescreen. If they wanted to do that, it would be Heckert's responsibility.
Wait, that's logic. Way over your head.
You probably think there are alien bodies in Area 51, the US government masterminded 9/11, and that Elvis is alive and eating burritos in a hidden mountain enclave.
Why can't you keep your slobbering all over Cam's knob on the other site? Must you jihad in two place?
As to me not having any evidence of you pimping black QBs as projects...cut from the other site...
"Better suggestion for this system is Tyrod Taylor in the fifth or sixth, who has a better arm runs a 4.51 forty is elusive and whose skill set screams WCO , and is the taylor made clone of Colt and Wallace and the kid we have from WVU."
You can't help it, even when I called you out on it. You are the racist, because your wet dreams of Cleveland Browns success have a black QB at the helm.
Prove me wrong. Link me posts where you have pimped white QBs as later round projects in the last month.
Your turn.
by RedDawg » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:29 pm
Cam Newton, 244. 
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:53 pm
RedDawg wrote:Hey stoopid yourself..
Never said they were there scouting a long snapper. ....
by RedDawg » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:08 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:RedDawg wrote:Hey stoopid yourself..
Never said they were there scouting a long snapper. ....
SD:
There comes a point of seperation between a Clueless bob and somebody who just doesn't get it .
You sir definately blurr that line .
SoulDawg
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:25 pm
by RedDawg » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:42 pm
peeker643 wrote:You guys are beginning to give me another fucking headache and I don't need one.
If you want to scream at each other or call each other names please exchange numbers in a PM and do it without using big, bold letters.
Talk about whatever this thread set forth to talk about or let's just agree to lock it down.
Thanks
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:55 pm
RedDawg wrote:peeker643 wrote:You guys are beginning to give me another fucking headache and I don't need one.
If you want to scream at each other or call each other names please exchange numbers in a PM and do it without using big, bold letters.
Talk about whatever this thread set forth to talk about or let's just agree to lock it down.
Thanks
Lock it down then.
Beating your head on a brick wall doesn't affect the wall.
I'm done with him.
by Triple-S » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:56 pm
The Browns have committed to Colt McCoy as their starting quarterback, but during the NFL scouting combine last month in Indianapolis, General Manager Tom Heckert did not rule out taking another quarterback high, even if the plan was to trade him as the Giants did in 2004 when they drafted Philip Rivers and traded him to the Chargers for quarterback Eli Manning.
"We think Colt's going to be a good quarterback, (we) really do," Heckert said. "On the other hand, you're never going to say — just like with a corner, will you take one, six and seven — if there's a quarterback we think is a great football player, you're crazy not to take him.
"I know it's a little different in Philly where we had (Donovan) McNabb and took Kevin (Kolb) — it was second round — but if we couldn't get out, we were taking Kevin Kolb in the first round. We moved down and still got him, which worked out well.
"I just think it's such a position of need throughout the NFL. If you have two great quarterbacks, it's not a bad thing. It's really not. First of all, we obviously went through it last year with three quarterbacks. On the other hand, you can always use one to trade or whatever, so if you think a quarterback's going to be a great one, you can't pass."
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
