by JCoz » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:37 pm
FUDU wrote:After a few weeks of ironing out some early season issues, and then winning some games in the toughest span on our schedule, we now know who we are and what we CAN do. With a let up in our schedule for the next 5 weeks this is when we grow by proving we can beat teams that we are "supposed" to beat. No reason we shouldn't go 3-2 in this span, and as long as each week there is the same kind of effort we've seen so far, and maybe even improvement, we can really build on what we've started.
The catch is now teams will be ready for us, we're not sneaking up on anyone for the remainder of this season, BUT with our two most recent losses we should be very hungry.
Plus the Bills got off the snide which takes a load of pressure off of us and anyone who plays them from here on out, don't laugh it's true, that would have been a dangerous game if the Bills were still winless.
I see 4 more wins if not 5 before it is all over.
I know you put it in quotes, but I agree with some of the comments below, there are very, very few teams, IMO, that you could honestly say the Browns "should" beat.
These next five are against teams that we CAN beat, if we play really well and the coaches keep bringing their A-game.
But the injuries are starting to mount, and 4 of these next 5 are on the road.
This will be the best team we play up until week 16, getting over this hump will be a nice springboard into the next 2 vs wounded Carolina and Miami teams.
Last edited by
JCoz on Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I won’t tell you exactly what it’s about, but this is typical of what might happen,'' he said. "I said, ‘Tom, do you want to do this?’ He said, ‘I don’t think I do. I think it’s too much or too strong or whatever.’ I said, ‘well, we might have to.’ And he goes, ‘well, if we have to, then you’ve got to tell me, because I won’t do it.’ And I said, ‘OK, then I might have to tell you. Fine.'''
Our fearless leader in the Draft War Room getting his hands dirty.
Yay for us.