Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:28 am
by motherscratcher » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:41 am
by motherscratcher » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:42 am
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:55 am
Motherscratcher wrote:I guess it depends what you mean by core players. Players that are irreplaceable? Those are few and far between so let's call core players "players who it would be very difficult to replace at their current level of production."
Core Players:
Joe Thomas
Alex Mack
TJ Ward
Peyton Hillis
Larry Vickers
Josh Cribbs
Ahtyba Rubin
I think I'm being generous too. There are other potential core players in your list, but nobody I feel comfortable putting there just let. Rubin might already be a stretch.
by FUDU » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Oh Yeah, don't forget about Robiskie.

by FUDU » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:32 pm
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:40 pm
FUDU wrote:Personally I define core players as somewhere in the middle of your two definitions. Players that are showing promise, young and that you can build around.
by motherscratcher » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:56 pm
JCoz wrote:Motherscratcher wrote:I guess it depends what you mean by core players. Players that are irreplaceable? Those are few and far between so let's call core players "players who it would be very difficult to replace at their current level of production."
Core Players:
Joe Thomas
Alex Mack
TJ Ward
Peyton Hillis
Larry Vickers
Josh Cribbs
Ahtyba Rubin
I think I'm being generous too. There are other potential core players in your list, but nobody I feel comfortable putting there just let. Rubin might already be a stretch.
No Rubin is def a core player.
I think you need to define it as guys you are going to move forward with as opposed to guys you are actively trying to replace.
by FUDU » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:59 pm
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:00 pm
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:06 pm
FUDU wrote:My ? Coz would be who are we actively trying to replace, right now?
EWrong doesn't count b/c we need to dig his hole in the ground first, then worry about replacing him.
by FUDU » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:13 pm
by JCoz » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:20 pm
FUDU wrote:You realize you are suggesting replacing 80% of the defense, and 70% of the offense?
I personally do not think we need that much over turn, get a difference maker on each side of the ball and that will allow you to hang on to many of these guys until you surely find a hands down better quality player.
My 2 cents.
by noles1 » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:33 pm

by mattvan1 » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:32 pm
noles1 wrote:We get a WR and a pass rusher and this team is really on to something, IMO.
by jb » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:26 pm
mattvan1 wrote:noles1 wrote:We get a WR and a pass rusher and this team is really on to something, IMO.
Yes.
And a LB who is good in coverage and doesn't weigh 250+
And a RT
Could be done in one draft. We just might be close. Very.
by RickNashEquilibrium » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:56 pm
jb wrote:OK, now here is the crazy assed thought for the day...
Jerruh has to be in full crazy for now an dthe foreseeable future. As much as I'm tempted to lock onto McCoy, I am also tempted to take penny stock I got at its low and sell it at it's possibly overvalued zeinith.
I heard somewhere that Jerruh is in full man-love with Colt McCoy. Assuming that Cleveland's and St Ann's own Jason Garrett can't change the trajectory of that runaway train and they have a top 4 pick, can we reverse Herschel them if Colt plays like he has so far? That being better than serviceable, poised, mistake free, some upside, but not showing true franchise QB tools to be an offensive centerpiece? Do we have the balls to trade away what could be Drew Brees II if we could get something like this: DeMarcus Ware, their number one, and Dez Bryant for Colt and our first rounder?
Is Jerruh that nuts / desperate?
If not that balls out trade, then what would it take to get Ware? Could we deal our number one and mak ethat happen if Dallas thinks they need a small rebuild ( Jerruh's ego making that doubtful tho ) ?
IMhO, Ware or his clone plus a young stud DE who can help cave the pile are what separates the Browns D from good to great (you move Fajita inside BTW).
by jb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:40 pm
by FUDU » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:46 pm
by jb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:49 pm
JCoz wrote:I was trying to find the old quotes from Savage talking about # of core players he was always after (no matter how well said players actually complimented each other or the coaching schemes) but I couldn't.
What do you guys see when you look below in regards to "core players" and sustainability compared to years past, and how does this maybe differ from say 2007, where hopes were high yet as we all clearly understand now was smoke and mirrors...
This is a list of players who are either possible core players or already are core players; if I've left a contributors name off, its probably because I dont see them on the team past this or next season, but I could have missed one, so let me know:
One comment I will add first is that obviously this list and team outlook hinge heavily on the guy under center becoming a real core player at the most important position.
Under 30:
QB Colt McCoy 24
FB Peyton Hillis 24
FB Lawrence Vickers 27
RB Montereo Hardesty 23
LT Joe Thomas 25
C Alex Mack 24
RG Shawn Lauvao 23
WR Mo Mass 24
TE Evan Moore 25
NT Ahtyba Rubin 24
LB Chris Gocong 27
LB Matt Roth 28
LB Marcus Bernard 25
CB Joe Haden 21
S TJ Ward 24
KR/WR Josh Cribbs 27
30 on up
LG Eric Steinbach 30
TE Ben Watson 30
LB Scott Fujita 31
by jb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:53 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Rubin might already be a stretch.

by JCoz » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:07 pm
by jb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:05 pm
JCoz wrote:JB, my list was of possible core players, I was kind of looking for others to make list from those players.
Certainly several of them wouldn't make my list of who I think are core players moving forward.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests