Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by OldDawg » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:46 am

by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:44 am
peeker643 wrote:Clearly not your day when EZ E out hustles and out mans you.
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:45 am
wiz1001 wrote:Enough with the Gatorade showers for coaches though, OK?
Act like you've been there, and all that.
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:55 am
Commodore Perry wrote:jb wrote:whisperwhisperplayoffspossiblewhisperwhisper
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/schedule-and-events/schedule.html
its not at all crazy to see them going 4-4 to close out at 7-9.
by leadpipe » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:19 am
jb wrote:wiz1001 wrote:Enough with the Gatorade showers for coaches though, OK?
Act like you've been there, and all that.
+ 1
And I thought it was stupid in 86 , too .
( see, we can agree on something )
by Triple-S » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:20 am
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by mattvan1 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:41 am
pup wrote:<---------------
Finally running out of room.
by pup » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:44 am
mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:<---------------
Finally running out of room.
And to think they've done it without Jerome Harrison
by FUDU » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:07 pm
I know you're probably gonna spasm in reply JB but hear me out.jb wrote:Commodore Perry wrote:jb wrote:whisperwhisperplayoffspossiblewhisperwhisper
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/schedule-and-events/schedule.html
its not at all crazy to see them going 4-4 to close out at 7-9.
CP - I;'m gonna kick myself and punt on the heart of a piece with a spoiler post, but look at the schedule and ask yourself the following questions:
- Do you automatically cross off a W every Sunday anymore?
- Can we run the ball?
- can Clt manage games well now, and make a play here and there to get over?
- Can Colt get better?
- Has the D come together in a manner befitting of witchcraft?
OK, let's go to the film for the previews:
Jets, Jags, Panthers, Dolphins, Bills over the next 5 games.
Given that playing in FLA in Dec freaks me out a little bit ( scarred by 85?) from a conditioning stand point, the game vs the Jets is now the biggest in club memory since the epic DA failure vs Cincy in 07. We win this game, and I see 4 wins in the next 5 games.
That's 7 - 6 heading into Cincy, B-more, and Pittsburgh. Crack/STD more is at home as is Pittsburgh.
I don't know that 9 - 7 gets it done this year, but maybe the AFC West can cannibalize itself and either the Colts or Bullheads can hit the skids.
Give me 7 - 6 in mid December at home with the physiclity of this bunch and I'll take my chances.
Thing is; it all strats Sunday.
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:09 pm
by FUDU » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:13 pm
jb wrote:You really see this team wiing only 3 more games?
With Car-Jax and the Bills on the schedule?
FU DU.
by mattvan1 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:15 pm
FUDU wrote: I know you're probably gonna spasm in reply JB but hear me out.
I know it sounds weird/wrong but I am not so sure I want to see us win that many more games (this season). Yeah it feels good, real good when they do in the likes of the teams we've recently beat, and yeah I know the philosophy of you take success whenever you can get it. Despite all that I feel we are better served with one of the higher picks in this draft to try to obtain a real special player for the long run. This isn't 2002 to me, where it felt like I was so thirsty I had to drink the first drop of water I saw. I've learned to ration now. Nobody here is saying we'd be tough out in the post season but for me I'd rather have the pick than a Rd 1 exit that would be most likely. I think Mangini has created an atmosphere strong enough to handle a disappointing season in terms of W-L that would not be ruined if we only won 2-3 more games.
IMO this team knows they can play, they believe in themselves and each other and it was all evident yesterday when they busted out the hugging and chest bumping.
6-10, good draft, make a historic double up in the win column next year, and be waiting a week to find out who your first playoff opponent will be.
by statmasta » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:21 pm
mattvan1 wrote:FUDU wrote: I know you're probably gonna spasm in reply JB but hear me out.
I know it sounds weird/wrong but I am not so sure I want to see us win that many more games (this season). Yeah it feels good, real good when they do in the likes of the teams we've recently beat, and yeah I know the philosophy of you take success whenever you can get it. Despite all that I feel we are better served with one of the higher picks in this draft to try to obtain a real special player for the long run. This isn't 2002 to me, where it felt like I was so thirsty I had to drink the first drop of water I saw. I've learned to ration now. Nobody here is saying we'd be tough out in the post season but for me I'd rather have the pick than a Rd 1 exit that would be most likely. I think Mangini has created an atmosphere strong enough to handle a disappointing season in terms of W-L that would not be ruined if we only won 2-3 more games.
IMO this team knows they can play, they believe in themselves and each other and it was all evident yesterday when they busted out the hugging and chest bumping.
6-10, good draft, make a historic double up in the win column next year, and be waiting a week to find out who your first playoff opponent will be.
The only problem is at 6-10 Mangini gets whacked, Ryan bolts, and Walrus waddles the sidelines. Giant step backwards IMO. This isn't the NBA where you must be in the Top 3 or 4. Just win baby.
by AK-ROWDY » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:22 pm
by FUDU » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:27 pm
I don't disagree with you one bit, which is why I am not so sure about how I feel about it @EOD. I do not want to see Mangini get fired and lose this staff, so if those were my two options then yeah like Adrian said win!mattvan1 wrote:FUDU wrote: I know you're probably gonna spasm in reply JB but hear me out.
I know it sounds weird/wrong but I am not so sure I want to see us win that many more games (this season). Yeah it feels good, real good when they do in the likes of the teams we've recently beat, and yeah I know the philosophy of you take success whenever you can get it. Despite all that I feel we are better served with one of the higher picks in this draft to try to obtain a real special player for the long run. This isn't 2002 to me, where it felt like I was so thirsty I had to drink the first drop of water I saw. I've learned to ration now. Nobody here is saying we'd be tough out in the post season but for me I'd rather have the pick than a Rd 1 exit that would be most likely. I think Mangini has created an atmosphere strong enough to handle a disappointing season in terms of W-L that would not be ruined if we only won 2-3 more games.
IMO this team knows they can play, they believe in themselves and each other and it was all evident yesterday when they busted out the hugging and chest bumping.
6-10, good draft, make a historic double up in the win column next year, and be waiting a week to find out who your first playoff opponent will be.
The only problem is at 6-10 Mangini gets whacked, Ryan bolts, and Walrus waddles the sidelines. Giant step backwards IMO. This isn't the NBA where you must be in the Top 3 or 4. Just win baby.
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:34 pm
by RickNashEquilibrium » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:55 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:07 pm
by JacksonDysonJackson » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:17 pm
by swerb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:33 pm
jb wrote:wiz1001 wrote:Enough with the Gatorade showers for coaches though, OK?
Act like you've been there, and all that.
+ 1
And I thought it was stupid in 86 , too .
( see, we can agree on something )
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:47 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:When's the last time a white running back led each team in rushing? Belichick and Mangini are tapping into the unused market just like Billy Beane did in Moneyball.
by danwismar » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:53 pm
by Erie Warrior » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:29 pm
FUDU wrote:
I know it sounds weird/wrong but I am not so sure I want to see us win that many more games (this season).


by motherscratcher » Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:29 pm
Triple-S wrote:Browns would have to find a way to either win out or not lose a game in order to make the playoffs. Also, they'd need the Inbred and/or Rats to make some slip ups and I don't see that happening.

by Fire Marshall Bill » Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:30 pm
jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:When's the last time a white running back led each team in rushing? Belichick and Mangini are tapping into the unused market just like Billy Beane did in Moneyball.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/l ... y_year.htm
If you count the AFL, Dickie Post. Otherwise, Jim Taylor.
by swerb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:49 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:14 pm
by jb » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:15 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Not to piss on the fire, but the browns desperately need a back that can effectively give Hillis a breather. White or Black, any good feature back needs someone to keep his legs fresh, especially as the weather gets colder and the body gets brittle.(r)
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:43 pm
jb wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Not to piss on the fire, but the browns desperately need a back that can effectively give Hillis a breather. White or Black, any good feature back needs someone to keep his legs fresh, especially as the weather gets colder and the body gets brittle.(r)
Bell really ain't bad in that role. Not great, but not bad.
Damn shame they never figured out Josh is a RB and not a WR tho.
by Gradysmanldy » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:21 am
by Gradysmanldy » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:21 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:Not to piss on the fire, but the browns desperately need a back that can effectively give Hillis a breather. White or Black, any good feature back needs someone to keep his legs fresh, especially as the weather gets colder and the body gets brittle.(r)
Bell really ain't bad in that role. Not great, but not bad.
Damn shame they never figured out Josh is a RB and not a WR tho.
SD:
Bell went out never came back , looked like a hip pointer although you can't find a report, looks like its gonna be the next guy up, the one we swiped off the pats practice squad this week , unless Bell has a miracle recovery .
maybe we find that shake and bake by accident reminiscent to last year when that other kid who is now selling pencils gave Jerome a breather.
That catch Josh layed out for and netted the first down at the ten was nails ,
can't agree he's a running back , butt he does need more touches.
SoulDawg
by jb » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:30 am
by FUDU » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:36 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests
