Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by FUDU » Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:41 am
by jb » Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:48 am
by motherscratcher » Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:48 am

by dpdad » Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:21 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:12 pm
by FUDU » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:28 pm
by bac5665 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:45 pm
by pup » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:51 pm
by DrPoove » Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:59 pm
by FUDU » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:04 pm
We've scored 9 TDs all season, Wallace and Hillis account for 8 of them, Delhomme the other 1. None of them will see action this Sunday, exactly where do you see TD's coming from? 17-0 IS our D keeping us in the game.bac5665 wrote:Jeez, come on guys. It doesn't have to be that bad. Anyone remember that we led the Ratbirds going into the 4th three weeks ago? The Ratbirds that just beat the Steelers?
I'm not saying we'll win, but I'm definitely saying I expect our defense to play decent ball, and if McCoy can put up 150+ yards and a TD with 2 or less picks, it'll be close enough for our D to keep us in the game.
by Loo » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:25 pm
by Erie Warrior » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:31 pm


by mistero » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:41 pm
by pup » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:42 pm
mistero wrote:This defense has done a good job keeping things reasonable. Hillis is playing. I still like Watson and Moore at TE. Cribbs seems to bring it against the hillbillies every year, before he got paid.
Browns 16
Stoolers 27
by mistero » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:44 pm
by bac5665 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:55 pm
FUDU wrote:We've scored 9 TDs all season, Wallace and Hillis account for 8 of them, Delhomme the other 1. None of them will see action this Sunday, exactly where do you see TD's coming from? 17-0 IS our D keeping us in the game.
by General » Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:58 pm

by Hikohadon » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:06 pm
by bac5665 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:08 pm
by jb » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:19 pm
bac5665 wrote:Exactly. If BQ can do it, CMcC can do it.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:38 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:I hope "first team practice reps" means, "Throwing while running straight backwards and to the sidelines" because you're right, he's not going to get anything remotely resembling a pocket sunday.
by jb » Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:56 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:I hope "first team practice reps" means, "Throwing while running straight backwards and to the sidelines" because you're right, he's not going to get anything remotely resembling a pocket sunday.
Why? The Browns are tied for 5th in least sacks allowed (7)* and tied for 3rd in least QB Hurries allowed with 14. If anything, the O-Line is the only thing the Browns can count on in any given game.
by JCoz » Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:12 pm
by ole uncle charle » Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:27 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Gradysmanldy wrote:I hope "first team practice reps" means, "Throwing while running straight backwards and to the sidelines" because you're right, he's not going to get anything remotely resembling a pocket sunday.
Why? The Browns are tied for 5th in least sacks allowed (7)* and tied for 3rd in least QB Hurries allowed with 14. If anything, the O-Line is the only thing the Browns can count on in any given game.
by hermanfontenot » Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:23 pm

by Gradysmanldy » Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:41 pm
Why? The Browns are tied for 5th in least sacks allowed (7)* and tied for 3rd in least QB Hurries allowed with 14. If anything, the O-Line is the only thing the Browns can count on in any given game.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:17 pm
by Commodore Perry » Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:39 pm
bac5665 wrote:Jeez, come on guys. It doesn't have to be that bad. Anyone remember that we led the Ratbirds going into the 4th three weeks ago? The Ratbirds that just beat the Steelers?
I'm not saying we'll win, but I'm definitely saying I expect our defense to play decent ball, and if McCoy can put up 150+ yards and a TD with 2 or less picks, it'll be close enough for our D to keep us in the game.
by jerryroche » Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:58 pm
by Magic Brownies » Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:14 pm

by diminishingskills » Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:33 am
by General » Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:06 am

by FUDU » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:06 am
by JCoz » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:41 am
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:I'll be shocked if Big Bitch doesn't throw 4 TDs and the Squealers win 38-10
Help us Obi Wan TjWard...you're our only hope
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:01 pm

by Nicastro13 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:48 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:06 pm

by Hikohadon » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:30 pm
peeker643 wrote:Raw rookie who's never taken a snap ( and no one can say if he's even close to as capable as Quinn and that's saying a lot/or very, very little).
by swerb » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:31 pm
by Erie Warrior » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:30 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote: Help us Obi Wan TjWard...you're our only hope


by Commodore Perry » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:41 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fire Marshall Bill wrote: Help us Obi Wan TjWard...you're our only hope
The only reason to watch this game is to hope TJ kills Hines.
by aoxo1 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:55 pm

by peeker643 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:30 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Raw rookie who's never taken a snap ( and no one can say if he's even close to as capable as Quinn and that's saying a lot/or very, very little).
I don't know if he's "as" capable yet, but, if he's alive and not currently experiencing a stroke, he's "close" to as capable.
You and I are "close" to as capable as Brady Quinn.
Quinn's stats from his great victory: 6 of 19 for 90 yards. 1 for 5 for 9 yards in the 2nd Half.
I don't expect much from McCoy, but I hope to god he has better stats than that. The proof, of course, will be in the number of picks. That's the one thing Quinn did well in that PIT game - when he badly missed his receivers, he missed them in spots where defenders weren't.
by JCoz » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Raw rookie who's never taken a snap ( and no one can say if he's even close to as capable as Quinn and that's saying a lot/or very, very little).
I don't know if he's "as" capable yet, but, if he's alive and not currently experiencing a stroke, he's "close" to as capable.
You and I are "close" to as capable as Brady Quinn.
Quinn's stats from his great victory: 6 of 19 for 90 yards. 1 for 5 for 9 yards in the 2nd Half.
I don't expect much from McCoy, but I hope to god he has better stats than that. The proof, of course, will be in the number of picks. That's the one thing Quinn did well in that PIT game - when he badly missed his receivers, he missed them in spots where defenders weren't.
Disagree brother.
It gets no more raw than 'first ever NFL snap'. Say what you want about Quinn but he had games under his belt. Really shitty games but he wasn't this raw.
Not to mention McCoy doesn't get the chance to play the Steelers while their very best defensive player is out of the lineup.
by peeker643 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:35 pm
JCoz wrote:Plus it's clear that Quinn imbibed a decided schematic advantage as a QB over Colt McCoy via Charlie Weis.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:09 pm
peeker643 wrote:No worries. Paper says Daboll spent a lot of one-on-one time with McCoy this week.
All systems go.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:09 pm
jb wrote:I predict that this Sunday will be much like Kyle Reece describes time travel in The Terminator.
by leadpipe » Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:18 pm
by mistero » Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:07 am
by British_Pharaoh » Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:05 am

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: gbot and 3 guests
