Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:42 pm
by Triple-S » Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:58 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:27 pm
Triple-S wrote:Jesus christ..another thread of this shit?
by JCoz » Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:30 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Triple-S wrote:Jesus christ..another thread of this shit?
Its Sunday so don't be using the Lords name in vain Fuckwad
by yogi » Sun Oct 03, 2010 5:52 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:29 pm
yogi wrote:AND he's down and out....
Can you say, Karma?
by FUDU » Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:38 pm
by Rat_Tail » Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:28 pm
by Loo » Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:25 pm
by jb » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:58 am
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:57 pm
jb wrote:And thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat's why you don't play QB like as if yer Marcus Allen. Let alone his constant living on the legal edge of society.
Only a fool builds a team ariound a man like this. And why is a man named Soul DAWG such a Vick fan anyway?
by Ziner » Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:18 pm
by yogi » Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:12 pm
Ziner wrote:SD, I love how you continually harp on us passing on Vick for nothing. However, I believe you are greatly underestimating the year of tutelage under Ried and McNabb that Vick got last year. Vick said so himself that he learned how to put the work in while watching McNabb. What makes you think he wouldnt have been the disaster many were expecting when he came back and starting taking snaps under center. You think he would have learned shit from Daboll, DA or Quinn? I believe you are completely glossing over this very important aspect of the Vick revival. Everything isnt 1+1=2. Vick is good in Philly does not equal Vick is good in Cleveland, just as Mark Sanchez in New York does not equal Mark Sanchez is good in Cleveland. You seem to always gloss over this aspect.
by Ziner » Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:19 pm
yogi wrote:Ziner wrote:SD, I love how you continually harp on us passing on Vick for nothing. However, I believe you are greatly underestimating the year of tutelage under Ried and McNabb that Vick got last year. Vick said so himself that he learned how to put the work in while watching McNabb. What makes you think he wouldnt have been the disaster many were expecting when he came back and starting taking snaps under center. You think he would have learned shit from Daboll, DA or Quinn? I believe you are completely glossing over this very important aspect of the Vick revival. Everything isnt 1+1=2. Vick is good in Philly does not equal Vick is good in Cleveland, just as Mark Sanchez in New York does not equal Mark Sanchez is good in Cleveland. You seem to always gloss over this aspect.
SD is probably refering to our not attempting to get Vick from the Eagles when we were asking them for Kolb this past offseason. So Vick would have had the year under Reid and McNabb you refer to.
He also would then have had sessions with MH on quarterbacking.
SD raised a real question on why this regime didnt even inquire about Vick and instead paid millions to Delhomme and secured Wallace.
I would love to hear from Heckert and Holgrem if Vick was even considered.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:00 pm
yogi wrote:Ziner wrote:SD, I love how you continually harp on us passing on Vick for nothing. However, I believe you are greatly underestimating the year of tutelage under Ried and McNabb that Vick got last year. Vick said so himself that he learned how to put the work in while watching McNabb. What makes you think he wouldnt have been the disaster many were expecting when he came back and starting taking snaps under center. You think he would have learned shit from Daboll, DA or Quinn? I believe you are completely glossing over this very important aspect of the Vick revival. Everything isnt 1+1=2. Vick is good in Philly does not equal Vick is good in Cleveland, just as Mark Sanchez in New York does not equal Mark Sanchez is good in Cleveland. You seem to always gloss over this aspect.
SD is probably refering to our not attempting to get Vick from the Eagles when we were asking them for Kolb this past offseason. So Vick would have had the year under Reid and McNabb you refer to.
He also would then have had sessions with MH on quarterbacking.
SD raised a real question on why this regime didnt even inquire about Vick and instead paid millions to Delhomme and secured Wallace.
I would love to hear from Heckert and Holgrem if Vick was even considered.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:24 pm
Ziner wrote:yogi wrote:Ziner wrote:SD, I love how you continually harp on us passing on Vick for nothing. However, I believe you are greatly underestimating the year of tutelage under Ried and McNabb that Vick got last year. Vick said so himself that he learned how to put the work in while watching McNabb. What makes you think he wouldnt have been the disaster many were expecting when he came back and starting taking snaps under center. You think he would have learned shit from Daboll, DA or Quinn? I believe you are completely glossing over this very important aspect of the Vick revival. Everything isnt 1+1=2. Vick is good in Philly does not equal Vick is good in Cleveland, just as Mark Sanchez in New York does not equal Mark Sanchez is good in Cleveland. You seem to always gloss over this aspect.
SD is probably refering to our not attempting to get Vick from the Eagles when we were asking them for Kolb this past offseason. So Vick would have had the year under Reid and McNabb you refer to.
He also would then have had sessions with MH on quarterbacking.
SD raised a real question on why this regime didnt even inquire about Vick and instead paid millions to Delhomme and secured Wallace.
I would love to hear from Heckert and Holgrem if Vick was even considered.
I dont think so, the post above he says how we could have had him for no draft picks and no cash. He would have absolutely costed us draft picks last year. But you never know with SD, he lives in his own reality.
by aoxo1 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:46 pm
by FUDU » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:48 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:06 pm
FUDU wrote:JB Vick was playing better this year, much more like a real QB, then he had in the past. Was he over the hump, surely not completely but he was heading in the right direction.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:33 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Nothing? We still had the opportunity to bring in Bartel.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
