JCoz wrote:Peek I guess my counter would be that 6-6" without those weaknesses should work too right?
Sure. Who we talking about?
Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by peeker643 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:19 pm
JCoz wrote:Peek I guess my counter would be that 6-6" without those weaknesses should work too right?
by JCoz » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:28 pm
peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:Peek I guess my counter would be that 6-6" without those weaknesses should work too right?
Sure. Who we talking about?
by peeker643 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:35 pm
JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:Peek I guess my counter would be that 6-6" without those weaknesses should work too right?
Sure. Who we talking about?
No one I know, lol.

by Erie Warrior » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:39 pm
aoxo1 wrote:It doesn't matter how good the DE is that you draft, if your QB sucks, even Reggie White can't help you that much.


by SoulDawg74 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:12 pm
wiz1001 wrote:I am all in favor of SD's suggestion of bringing in Nate Davis, for the short term at least, if's it's workable...if only to put a dynamic athlete onto a roster that has so few of them.
by aoxo1 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:49 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:It doesn't matter how good the DE is that you draft, if your QB sucks, even Reggie White can't help you that much.
In a vacuum, this is correct. But, Reggie White won't hurt you. Dan Mcgwire will. Are they going to the Super Bowl without a quality QB, no. But we're talking about not sucking. Baby steps. I'd rather take a 3rd round flier on a project, then burn a #1 on "makes all the throws".
Go ugly early, until you have enough uglys to win a street fight.
by motherscratcher » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:18 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:It doesn't matter how good the DE is that you draft, if your QB sucks, even Reggie White can't help you that much.
In a vacuum, this is correct. But, Reggie White won't hurt you. Dan Mcgwire will. Are they going to the Super Bowl without a quality QB, no. But we're talking about not sucking. Baby steps. I'd rather take a 3rd round flier on a project, then burn a #1 on "makes all the throws".
Go ugly early, until you have enough uglys to win a street fight.
Well for pete's sake, of course drafting a bust is going to be a waste. Is anyone here advocating they draft a QB just for the sake of drafting a QB?
Courtney Brown doesn't do you any favors either, FTR.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:It doesn't matter how good the DE is that you draft, if your QB sucks, even Reggie White can't help you that much.
In a vacuum, this is correct. But, Reggie White won't hurt you. Dan Mcgwire will. Are they going to the Super Bowl without a quality QB, no. But we're talking about not sucking. Baby steps. I'd rather take a 3rd round flier on a project, then burn a #1 on "makes all the throws".
Go ugly early, until you have enough uglys to win a street fight.
Well for pete's sake, of course drafting a bust is going to be a waste. Is anyone here advocating they draft a QB just for the sake of drafting a QB?
Courtney Brown doesn't do you any favors either, FTR.
Wait a second. With the Browns drafting record maybe they SHOULD try to draft a QB bust. You're a genius.
by smalls1129 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:45 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:51 pm
smalls1129 wrote:After Saturday, Luck has my vote by far. Athletic, with a good arm, running a pro offense. Only negative, same can be said of all the QB's at USC under Carrol and not all have panned out.
by smalls1129 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:01 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:smalls1129 wrote:After Saturday, Luck has my vote by far. Athletic, with a good arm, running a pro offense. Only negative, same can be said of all the QB's at USC under Carrol and not all have panned out.
SD:
Luck plays for Stanford and is coached by Harbaugh , although USC has a very good true Soph ,worthy of this discussion but alas ineligible for next years draft.
SoulDawg
by noles1 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:09 pm

by Hikohadon » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:19 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:It doesn't matter how good the DE is that you draft, if your QB sucks, even Reggie White can't help you that much.
In a vacuum, this is correct. But, Reggie White won't hurt you. Dan Mcgwire will. Are they going to the Super Bowl without a quality QB, no. But we're talking about not sucking. Baby steps. I'd rather take a 3rd round flier on a project, then burn a #1 on "makes all the throws".
Go ugly early, until you have enough uglys to win a street fight.
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:33 pm
smalls1129 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:smalls1129 wrote:After Saturday, Luck has my vote by far. Athletic, with a good arm, running a pro offense. Only negative, same can be said of all the QB's at USC under Carrol and not all have panned out.
SD:
Luck plays for Stanford and is coached by Harbaugh , although USC has a very good true Soph ,worthy of this discussion but alas ineligible for next years draft.
SoulDawg
Was more referring to the NFL success of Carrol's QB's. Because there really weren't any on Saturday, what are Luck's weaknesses?
by OldDawg » Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:54 pm
jfiling wrote:bac5665 wrote:I'll take Luck. Not sure why, mostly no confidence in the other two.
But does it matter? Does anyone actually think that the Browns can draft a first round QB and not be a bust? When was the last QB we drafted to have a winning record in starts for the Browns? (I'm actually asking, cause I have no freaking clue.)
1985 Supplemental Draft, we took the QB from the University of Miami.

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:41 am

by hermanfontenot » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:01 am
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Michael Vick

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:53 am
hermanfontenot wrote:Not the worst idea ever put forth by any means.

by jb » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:05 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:wiz1001 wrote:I am all in favor of SD's suggestion of bringing in Nate Davis, for the short term at least, if's it's workable...if only to put a dynamic athlete onto a roster that has so few of them.
SD:
Football is the same now as when Vince Lombardi succinctly coined the phrase .
""YOU WIN WITH PEOPLE ""
He wasn't thinking of jake Delhomme Barton Viekune and Chansi Stuckey
let alone weak sisters of the poor like Colt Mccoy when he was immortalizing the grail.
by bucknutz94 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:42 am
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:50 pm
jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:wiz1001 wrote:I am all in favor of SD's suggestion of bringing in Nate Davis, for the short term at least, if's it's workable...if only to put a dynamic athlete onto a roster that has so few of them.
SD:
Football is the same now as when Vince Lombardi succinctly coined the phrase .
""YOU WIN WITH PEOPLE ""
He wasn't thinking of jake Delhomme Barton Viekune and Chansi Stuckey
let alone weak sisters of the poor like Colt Mccoy when he was immortalizing the grail.
heyzeus man, I can deal with your rantings, but not when you mix up immortal quotes.
"You win with people" is from Woody fuckin' Hayes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Hayes#Notable_quotes
http://www.amazon.com/You-win-people-Woody-Hayes/dp/B0006CC1DG
And BTW, Vince Lombardi built a dynasty on alike a 17th round draft pick he found sitting on the bench at QB. Woody played a 4th RB at QB for almost all of his career. Kern converted to S in the NFL.
Where is my head shaking icon, dammit?
Now I agree that if mangini is still here the franchise will undervalue QB's and as of now bama's marcell dareus looks the part of a mangini pick and I owuldn't cry about him, but stop disrepescting Woody you senile old coot.
Now business: This is still Sunday football. I don't care about Phipps, Couch or all the busts in the world. You give Mike Holmgren and John Gruden a shot at the helm, you gota go franchise QB prospect. Else pick another brain trust.
by motherscratcher » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:30 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:
Holmgren has a built in scapegoat and fall guy to blame for this soon to be epic losing season , and the horse is already stabled and saddled for him to come in on his shinny white Armor and save the day.
SoulDawg
by Hikohadon » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:33 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:
Holmgren has a built in scapegoat and fall guy to blame for this soon to be epic losing season , and the horse is already stabled and saddled for him to come in on his shinny white Armor and save the day.
SoulDawg
I think that may be the case here. Holmgren kept Mangini around so that he could have 2 offseasons instead of one to rebuild for either Chucky or himself. I'm just not quite as convinced yet as you are that he wants to step back in.
The only problem with the plan would be...what if the Browns win 7-8 games?
by jb » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:47 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:wiz1001 wrote:I am all in favor of SD's suggestion of bringing in Nate Davis, for the short term at least, if's it's workable...if only to put a dynamic athlete onto a roster that has so few of them.
SD:
Football is the same now as when Vince Lombardi succinctly coined the phrase .
""YOU WIN WITH PEOPLE ""
He wasn't thinking of jake Delhomme Barton Viekune and Chansi Stuckey
let alone weak sisters of the poor like Colt Mccoy when he was immortalizing the grail.
heyzeus man, I can deal with your rantings, but not when you mix up immortal quotes.
"You win with people" is from Woody fuckin' Hayes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Hayes#Notable_quotes
http://www.amazon.com/You-win-people-Woody-Hayes/dp/B0006CC1DG
And BTW, Vince Lombardi built a dynasty on alike a 17th round draft pick he found sitting on the bench at QB. Woody played a 4th RB at QB for almost all of his career. Kern converted to S in the NFL.
Where is my head shaking icon, dammit?
Now I agree that if mangini is still here the franchise will undervalue QB's and as of now bama's marcell dareus looks the part of a mangini pick and I owuldn't cry about him, but stop disrepescting Woody you senile old coot.
Now business: This is still Sunday football. I don't care about Phipps, Couch or all the busts in the world. You give Mike Holmgren and John Gruden a shot at the helm, you gota go franchise QB prospect. Else pick another brain trust.
SD:
JB make me the case where it makes sense for Gruden to come in here as the third banana .
The only reason Holmgren hasn't taken over is because of the fact we don't have a QB,
The only way we can get a franchise pick now after passing on both Freeman and the Sanchise is thru continuos suck .
Holmgren has a built in scapegoat and fall guy to blame for this soon to be epic losing season , and the horse is already stabled and saddled for him to come in on his shinny white Armor and save the day.
SoulDawg
by jb » Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:34 am
by JCoz » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:09 pm
jb wrote:Both Luck and Mallett are on national TV this saturday at 3:30 pm.
DVR and strat taking notes...
by jb » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:59 pm
JCoz wrote:jb wrote:Both Luck and Mallett are on national TV this saturday at 3:30 pm.
DVR and strat taking notes...
Against Bama no less. We will learn alot about both Malett and the rebuilt Bama defense (9 new starters)
First offense with a pulse this season for Bama.
by JCoz » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:03 pm
by jb » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:08 pm
JCoz wrote:Yeah Darius (sp) is a beast.
Might be the heaviest notable college DE I've seen in some time, listed at 306lbs right now.
by JCoz » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:10 pm
jb wrote:JCoz wrote:Yeah Darius (sp) is a beast.
Might be the heaviest notable college DE I've seen in some time, listed at 306lbs right now.
Be the most perfect 3 - 4 DE pospect since Wilfork IMhO.
I [promise you he's a patriot next season and not a Brown. :-(
by jb » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:14 pm
JCoz wrote:jb wrote:JCoz wrote:Yeah Darius (sp) is a beast.
Might be the heaviest notable college DE I've seen in some time, listed at 306lbs right now.
Be the most perfect 3 - 4 DE pospect since Wilfork IMhO.
I [promise you he's a patriot next season and not a Brown. :-(
The most perfect? Depends on what type of 3-4 I guess, but Clayborn and Heyward wouldn't be such bad consolation prizes for whoever gets them...
by JCoz » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:23 pm
jb wrote:JCoz wrote:jb wrote:JCoz wrote:Yeah Darius (sp) is a beast.
Might be the heaviest notable college DE I've seen in some time, listed at 306lbs right now.
Be the most perfect 3 - 4 DE pospect since Wilfork IMhO.
I [promise you he's a patriot next season and not a Brown. :-(
The most perfect? Depends on what type of 3-4 I guess, but Clayborn and Heyward wouldn't be such bad consolation prizes for whoever gets them...
Wouldn't want Claybourn anywhere near a 3 - 4. Heyward can probably swing, but for a 3 - 4 give me the zuper fat assed athlete size.
by jb » Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:34 pm
JCoz wrote:jb wrote:JCoz wrote:jb wrote:JCoz wrote:Yeah Darius (sp) is a beast.
Might be the heaviest notable college DE I've seen in some time, listed at 306lbs right now.
Be the most perfect 3 - 4 DE pospect since Wilfork IMhO.
I [promise you he's a patriot next season and not a Brown. :-(
The most perfect? Depends on what type of 3-4 I guess, but Clayborn and Heyward wouldn't be such bad consolation prizes for whoever gets them...
Wouldn't want Claybourn anywhere near a 3 - 4. Heyward can probably swing, but for a 3 - 4 give me the zuper fat assed athlete size.
I can't pretend to have a deep knowledge of different 3-4 styles in the NFL, a cursory look at 3-4 rosters in the NFL would seem to indicate that the Cowboys, Pats, Jets, and baltimore agree with you, with maybe the Chargers and Steelers being possibly a little less rigid regarding the sheer mass of their 3-4 ends.
by Erie Warrior » Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:51 pm


by noles1 » Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:22 pm

by Erie Warrior » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:01 pm
noles1 wrote:Will be flipping over to Bama-Arkansas to get a look at Mallet now.



by hermanfontenot » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:33 pm

by leadpipe » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:35 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:Some horrible decision-making from Mallet in the last few minutes of that game.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:57 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:Some horrible decision-making from Mallet in the last few minutes of that game.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:23 am
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:02 am
peeker643 wrote:There's one choice.
Your eyes and common sense ain't lying.
One choice no matter what the spin doctors say between now and April.
by motherscratcher » Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:05 am
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:21 am
Motherscratcher wrote:I'm not convinced that Pryor is going to come out yet. I guess we'll have to see how the season plays out. Luck seems like far and away the best bet out of those 3 SD. Although Pryor probably has the most upside, he has great potential to crash and burn.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:39 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:But we know all too well after seeing the Lebron failure its still about the intangibles.
An undefeated season and National Championship would cover a multitude of sins.
SoulDawg
SoulDawg
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:11 pm
peeker643 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:But we know all too well after seeing the Lebron failure its still about the intangibles.
An undefeated season and National Championship would cover a multitude of sins.
SoulDawg
SoulDawg
Why would an undefeated season and a NC make Pryor a better pro? Is it similar to how it made Dorsey, Krenzel and Tebow better NFL QBs?
Not agreeing with that thought SD.
As to Locker/DA comparisons, if DA was half the athlete Locker is DA would be, well, much more athletic. Unfortunately I think DA may be a more accurate passer than Locker.Unless Locker is compensating for a really, really shitty supporting cast this season.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:24 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
INTANGIBLES , that extra something something which can't be defined .
Found in Champions guys who get it done in the Clutch when the pressure is greatest , by any means necessary .
You can debate the differences between locker and Da and the rest , not interested .
Luck and Pryor are the premiere top two Pro talents .
Different skill sets different levels of refinement but both with Championship type intangibles.
I could see either one leading the Browns to Championships properly supported with the
players and offensive scheme which compliments their abilities.
Not looking for good , I want a Great talent and both of those guys fit the bill.
SoulDawg
SoulDawg
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
peeker643 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
INTANGIBLES , that extra something something which can't be defined .
Found in Champions guys who get it done in the Clutch when the pressure is greatest , by any means necessary .
You can debate the differences between locker and Da and the rest , not interested .
Luck and Pryor are the premiere top two Pro talents .
Different skill sets different levels of refinement but both with Championship type intangibles.
I could see either one leading the Browns to Championships properly supported with the
players and offensive scheme which compliments their abilities.
Not looking for good , I want a Great talent and both of those guys fit the bill.
SoulDawg
SoulDawg
Again, I understand the intangibles part. But I don't see Pryor in the same league with Luck right now from a TANGIBLE standpoint. His motion needs work, his drops need work. He's still too long and loopy to the release.
NC ain't gonna change that any more than it did for Tebow and any more than intangibles made Krenzel and Dorsey's tangibles any better.
Physically Pryor has it all over those guys, no doubt. But throwing the football accurately and efficiently? Man, I'd put him behind all three of the guys we're talking about if you're looking at just that. Again, he's got time to grow and improve if he stays. But he's not close enough to a finished product to choose over Luck, Locker or Mallett in 2011 draft. And those guys being there this year is one more reason I think he stays for his senior year. Get rid of draft competiton and let the NFL CBA issue resolve.
YMMV
by JCoz » Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:02 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 3 guests
