Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by pup » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:26 pm
by Lubber » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:41 pm
Pup wrote:BroncoFan - your choice of Anderson or Quinn plus Shaun Rogers for Cutler and #12. You buying?
by Jennifer » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:09 pm
by Ziner » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:12 pm
Jennifer wrote:Cutler says he doesn't really want to go and ESPN radio mentioned this afternoon that when the Bears called Denver yesterday Denver told them they were not yet ready to talk trade.
Kissing and making up doesn't seem all that impossible.
by jb » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:15 pm
Jennifer wrote:Cutler says he doesn't really want to go and ESPN radio mentioned this afternoon that when the Bears called Denver yesterday Denver told them they were not yet ready to talk trade.
Kissing and making up doesn't seem all that impossible.
by Bob Fergus » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:38 pm
Source: Cutler trade imminent
By John Keim
Examiner Staff Writer 4/3/09
According to an Examiner source, the Redskins are nearing completion of a trade that would bring Broncos QB Jay Cutler to Washington. Paul Spinelli/Getty Images The Redskins are close to completing a deal for Denver quarterback Jay Cutler, according to an NFL source.
The source, who told The Examiner of the Redskins’ interest in Cutler two weeks ago, was uncertain what Washington had to surrender in the deal and said it’s “going down as we speak.” The Redskins have shopped current starter quarterback Jason Campbell.
The source had said in a separate conversation about five minutes earlier that Washington appeared to be bumped from the favorite position in favor of another team, possibly Cleveland. However, after hanging up he quickly called back to say, “It changed.”
by BroncoFan » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:56 pm
Pup wrote:BroncoFan - your choice of Anderson or Quinn plus Shaun Rogers for Cutler and #12. You buying?
by BroncoFan » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:59 pm
Lubber wrote:Pup wrote:BroncoFan - your choice of Anderson or Quinn plus Shaun Rogers for Cutler and #12. You buying?
After reading their message boards, I would say they are almost divided 50-50. There is the faction that can't stand Cutler and his tissue crying ways, so they would love BQ/DA and Rogers. Then there is the faction that hates McD for lieing, so they want him ousted and JCut to be the man.
by BroncoFan » Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:02 pm
Ziner wrote:Jennifer wrote:Cutler says he doesn't really want to go and ESPN radio mentioned this afternoon that when the Bears called Denver yesterday Denver told them they were not yet ready to talk trade.
Kissing and making up doesn't seem all that impossible.
I think Cutler got his bluff called. Wouldn't suprise me if he was just angling for a new contract and used this as an excuse to pout so they would then try to make him happy. Why the hell would he want to leave Denver when he could be sent to a place like Detroit or Cleveland. He is going to continue to backpedal, I think he doesnt want out and all he wanted is a contract. Now he looks like a bitch and may end up playing for an 0-16 team.
by ProgRocker » Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:19 pm
BroncoFan wrote:Ziner wrote:Jennifer wrote:Cutler says he doesn't really want to go and ESPN radio mentioned this afternoon that when the Bears called Denver yesterday Denver told them they were not yet ready to talk trade.
Kissing and making up doesn't seem all that impossible.
I think Cutler got his bluff called. Wouldn't suprise me if he was just angling for a new contract and used this as an excuse to pout so they would then try to make him happy. Why the hell would he want to leave Denver when he could be sent to a place like Detroit or Cleveland. He is going to continue to backpedal, I think he doesnt want out and all he wanted is a contract. Now he looks like a bitch and may end up playing for an 0-16 team.
Don't discount Bus Cook's role in this.
by BroncoFan » Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:27 pm
ProgRocker wrote:BroncoFan wrote:Ziner wrote:Jennifer wrote:Cutler says he doesn't really want to go and ESPN radio mentioned this afternoon that when the Bears called Denver yesterday Denver told them they were not yet ready to talk trade.
Kissing and making up doesn't seem all that impossible.
I think Cutler got his bluff called. Wouldn't suprise me if he was just angling for a new contract and used this as an excuse to pout so they would then try to make him happy. Why the hell would he want to leave Denver when he could be sent to a place like Detroit or Cleveland. He is going to continue to backpedal, I think he doesnt want out and all he wanted is a contract. Now he looks like a bitch and may end up playing for an 0-16 team.
Don't discount Bus Cook's role in this.
And supposedly Bus Cook has told Mangini that Cutler doesn't like Mangini and won't play for the Browns, either. (That's a radio report out of Chicago, by the way).
by Jennifer » Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:08 pm
The Broncos announced Thursday that they had agreed to trade their disgruntled Pro Bowl passer to the Bears, who’ve gone through a bevy of quarterbacks without much success ever since Jim McMahon was calling plays in the 1980s.
The Broncos will get quarterback Kyle Orton in return, along with two first-round draft picks and a third-rounder.
The Broncos get the Bears’ top pick in this year’s draft, which is No. 18 overall, and Chicago’s first-round draft pick in 2010 along with a third-round selection this year (No. 84 overall). Denver also gave up a fifth-rounder this year.
by Bob Fergus » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:54 pm
BroncoFan wrote:Ok a couple of things here,
1. Jay has not been a head case on the field, he only became a head case through the media and 90% of the dolts writing are making up their stories as they go along. I don't think other than Jay, McD, Jay's apparently idiot agent Bus Cook, and Bowlen anyone really knows what has transpired. Heck with Bowlen's apparent memory loss I'm not sure even he knows. Remember Bus is the genius that managed Farve to the Jets last year and we saw how well that was handled in the press. Worked out fine for Bus $$$ but I don't think Brett ever wanted to be there. There is no doubt in my mind, however, that McD should have been on a plane to find Jay and talk to him in person. He is trying to bring a Patriots system and a Belichick mentality to Denver. The system may work, but he hasn't come close to earning Belichick respect yet so he should be doing more, IMHO, to fix this.
2. Denver is far from enamored with Quinn and I don't know why anyone would think Quinn is such a perfect fit for McDaniels system.
... The source said Denver's preferences for a quarterback were Quinn and then Chicago's Kyle Orton ...
3. There is still a chance, although small, that all of this will amount to nothing. Players and teams have a way of making up if the right circumstances occur. Players with lousy character get recycled through the league all the time against all odds. True it often ends up imploding sooner or later but Jay had no management issues prior to this. The next two weeks will be interesting.
by BroncoFan » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:49 pm
by yogi » Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:15 am
I can only shudder to think what Denver would have gotten if they had been in the "driver's seat."
Denver ain't demanding shit. They are NOT in the driver's seat.
But they can let the demand for Cutler drive up his price. Enter Washington. Snyder will want him. They do have a better than ok young QB they could trade along with a D player and picks. Thats where I see Cutler going. To an NFC team.
One thing has changed in the last couple of days...
.
by JCoz » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:38 am
Jennifer wrote:The Broncos announced Thursday that they had agreed to trade their disgruntled Pro Bowl passer to the Bears, who’ve gone through a bevy of quarterbacks without much success ever since Jim McMahon was calling plays in the 1980s.
The Broncos will get quarterback Kyle Orton in return, along with two first-round draft picks and a third-rounder.
The Broncos get the Bears’ top pick in this year’s draft, which is No. 18 overall, and Chicago’s first-round draft pick in 2010 along with a third-round selection this year (No. 84 overall). Denver also gave up a fifth-rounder this year.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=a ... &type=lgns
I can only shudder to think what Denver would have gotten if they had been in the "driver's seat."
by stonepm » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:41 am
by jb » Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:11 pm
BroncoFan wrote:This is going to play out very badly for Denver and very well for Chicago. Denver, i.e, BOWLEN, fucked up bigtime.
by bw » Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:51 pm
JB wrote:BroncoFan wrote:This is going to play out very badly for Denver and very well for Chicago. Denver, i.e, BOWLEN, fucked up bigtime.
Maybe maybe not. We won't know until the season starts.
Bowlen f'd up when he drank the BB soopergenius kool aid and hired the unqualified 10 year old never played football on a meaningful level wannabe HC .
This is a resulting detail.
by Jennifer » Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:50 pm
JCoz wrote:Jennifer wrote:The Broncos announced Thursday that they had agreed to trade their disgruntled Pro Bowl passer to the Bears, who’ve gone through a bevy of quarterbacks without much success ever since Jim McMahon was calling plays in the 1980s.
The Broncos will get quarterback Kyle Orton in return, along with two first-round draft picks and a third-rounder.
The Broncos get the Bears’ top pick in this year’s draft, which is No. 18 overall, and Chicago’s first-round draft pick in 2010 along with a third-round selection this year (No. 84 overall). Denver also gave up a fifth-rounder this year.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=a ... &type=lgns
I can only shudder to think what Denver would have gotten if they had been in the "driver's seat."
I think Yogi was absolutely right, without washington driving the price up, they don't get what they recieved yesterday.
I think you are clearly underestimating the Snyder factor, which is, IMO what drove the price up.
by yogi » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:17 am
No, I think both you and Yogi misunderstood my sarcasm. My point was that they obviously were in the driver's seat.
Did they get more than they might otherwise have gotten if Snyder wasn't interested? Quite possibly but what relevance does that have to my original point that Denever was indeed in the driver's seat.
Denever when it announced it was going to trade Cutler knew multiple teams (including Washington) would be in the picture. They offered an opening minimum bid one that if that is all they had gotten was a pretty good deal for him.
I really just don't get why you and Yogi don't understand that when multiple bidders have a serious interest in a player the player's team is going to receive reasonable value and not a "fire sale" price.
I further don't understand why after I outlined why Denver would receive value, even suggesting it was possible they might get excessive value, and it actually happened as I said it would you guys still want to argue about.
Really all I offered was Negotiation 101 principles; simple basically understand negotiation principles not some outlandish radical theory.
by Jennifer » Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:06 am
The old condecending ploy to avoid admitting you were clueless.yogi wrote:No, I think both you and Yogi misunderstood my sarcasm. My point was that they obviously were in the driver's seat.
Did they get more than they might otherwise have gotten if Snyder wasn't interested? Quite possibly but what relevance does that have to my original point that Denever was indeed in the driver's seat.
Denever when it announced it was going to trade Cutler knew multiple teams (including Washington) would be in the picture. They offered an opening minimum bid one that if that is all they had gotten was a pretty good deal for him.
I really just don't get why you and Yogi don't understand that when multiple bidders have a serious interest in a player the player's team is going to receive reasonable value and not a "fire sale" price.
I further don't understand why after I outlined why Denver would receive value, even suggesting it was possible they might get excessive value, and it actually happened as I said it would you guys still want to argue about.
Really all I offered was Negotiation 101 principles; simple basically understand negotiation principles not some outlandish radical theory.
oye. Let's just drop this.
We can't get to Negotiation 101 principles until english is fully understood and comprehended.
by yogi » Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:07 am
The old condecending ploy to avoid admitting you were clueless.
K, I'll play. We can continue this discussion this summer after you've finished the 10th grade.
by Bob Fergus » Sat Apr 04, 2009 4:21 pm
bw wrote:JB wrote:BroncoFan wrote:This is going to play out very badly for Denver and very well for Chicago. Denver, i.e, BOWLEN, fucked up bigtime.
Maybe maybe not. We won't know until the season starts.Bowlen f'd up when he drank the BB soopergenius kool aid and hired the unqualified 10 year old never played football on a meaningful level wannabe HC .
This is a resulting detail.
If I'm reading this correctly (I usually do), Bowlen got tired of Shanahan's irrational avoidance of the defensive side of the football while loading up in the offensive side. The fans got tired of conversations like, "Gee wasn't that an exciting game?" Response, "No, we lost. We lost four in a row to miss the playoffs because our defense just simply sucks. We couldn't beat anybody except for the hapless Browns who couldn't stop our fourth-string backup fullback."
... A famous former Bronco sided with Cutler and against McDaniels and the team.
"This is sad. This was handled wrong all the way around. Jay, maybe he overreacted, maybe he did overreact, but in order for you to come in and when your team, your team is the 30th ranked defense in football, the 30th ranked defense, you have the number two ranked offense in football, and the first thing you do is say, 'You know what, I want to make my football team better, I want to get rid of the quarterback," former Broncos tight end Shannon Sharpe said on 850 KOA on Thursday afternoon. "I love Mr. Bowlen because he's always been fair to me, but they lied to the kid."
"Would you in the possibility of thinking about trading a franchise player, you automatically talk to the owner. I don't care how much power you have as a head coach or general manager, when you're dealing with a franchise player, and this is what this kid is, a franchise player, you must run it by the owner first. And so for them to say Pat had no knowledge of this, we were just in the early stages, is a flat out lie," Sharpe said.
Once Shanahan was fired, it became clear the Offense was no longer going to be featured at the expense of the defense. I'm not really all that sure that McDaniels didn't outsmart everybody. I don't believe he wanted a 'me-first' QB who wanted to be in the limelight and on the ESPN high-light reels at the expense of the team winning football games. I'm not sure that Mickey-D didn't actually WANT Cutler gone.
Look what he got in return? Highway robbery if you ask me.
I think Mac, et al, are going to do what we've failed to do since "The Return." Build the team from the inside out, Belichick style. I don't see them trading away draft picks in a panic move to acquire a 'franchise' QB. Mac & Bowlen understand they're two years away from fielding a team capable of winning the Soopie Bowl. And that's Bowlen's goal. He doesn't want to field a competitive team, he wants to win the Souper Bowl. Every year.
I think the Donks are willing to take a step back in order to take two steps forward. A good draft this year on defense, a good draft next year (they got Chi's firstie next year, too) and they're ready to rock & roll.
Meanwhile, I understand there's a kick ass Rugby player in New Zealand that we might be able to convert to a 3-4 OLB. The Browns might take him at 5.
by Triple-S » Sat Apr 04, 2009 4:40 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Jennifer » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:02 pm
yogi wrote:The old condecending ploy to avoid admitting you were clueless.
K, I'll play. We can continue this discussion this summer after you've finished the 10th grade.
I'll ignore the 2nd set of insults you've sent my way.
driver's seat
–noun 1. the seat from which a vehicle is operated.
2. a position of power, dominance, control, or superiority: After the election the Democrats were back in the driver's seat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Origin:
1920–25 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/driver's%20seat
Once the Broncos declared things could not be worked out with Cutler and they were fielding offers to trade him, they no longer had power, dominance, control or superiority of the situation. They no longer had the option of pulling away from the trade table and say they will not trade Cutler. They had to take the best offer out there.
Thats's it. Definition of the term and applied to the situation the Broncs put themselves in.
Was Cutler a hot commodity? Evidently yes. And they were lucky Snyder was involved to inflate the price. But my point is that had the best offer been much, much less, they still would have had to accept.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
