Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by el67ko » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:36 pm
by dpdad » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:51 pm
by noles1 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:06 pm

by waborat » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:10 pm
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:25 pm


by Crash Davis » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:27 pm
by el67ko » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:39 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
by noles1 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?

by jfiling » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:09 pm
LT Kevin Shaffer's contract is worth $36 million over seven years, including $12.5 million in guarantees.
It's similar to Jonas Jennings' contract last year with the 49ers. The value of the first three years of Shaffer's deal is $17.5 million. That's pretty much the going rate for an average left tackle.
by Guest » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:11 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
by jfiling » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:14 pm
It may not be over. Shaffer, who was due a $1 million roster bonus on Friday, is contemplating accepting a restructured offer from the Browns.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:33 pm
Hiko wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
Ryan Tucker? A draft pick? A Free Agent?
Maybe you should let the process play out? Just a suggestion.


by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:45 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Hiko wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
Ryan Tucker? A draft pick? A Free Agent?
Maybe you should let the process play out? Just a suggestion.
Or maybe the fire sale is an awful idea. There were too many holes on this team before they started to move starters. We all know how this story ends, it doesn't need to play out.
by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:17 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Hiko wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
Ryan Tucker? A draft pick? A Free Agent?
Maybe you should let the process play out? Just a suggestion.
Or maybe the fire sale is an awful idea. There were too many holes on this team before they started to move starters. We all know how this story ends, it doesn't need to play out.
by ilasch » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:18 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Hiko wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
Ryan Tucker? A draft pick? A Free Agent?
Maybe you should let the process play out? Just a suggestion.
Or maybe the fire sale is an awful idea. There were too many holes on this team before they started to move starters. We all know how this story ends, it doesn't need to play out.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:21 pm


by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:25 pm
ilasch wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Hiko wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Fine.... I'll ask it. Even if Shaffer is less than good, with whom will he be replaced? A rookie? A scrap heap Jet?
Ryan Tucker? A draft pick? A Free Agent?
Maybe you should let the process play out? Just a suggestion.
Or maybe the fire sale is an awful idea. There were too many holes on this team before they started to move starters. We all know how this story ends, it doesn't need to play out.
How does cutting the only living wide receiver without knees and a grossly overpaid RT, along with trading a malcontent tight end for valuable draft picks constitute a fire sale? If there's a fire analogy to be found, isn't this more like a controlled burn?
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:27 pm
Pup wrote:
Dude. Cat sucked. I can probably check the archives and find a post with you begging for this cat to be sent packing.
Shitty starters are not irreplaceable. Ever.


by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:31 pm
by 4thQtrGlory » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:37 pm
Pup wrote:First of all. This draft is rated very highly. Just not at the top. The depth, especially for offensive line, is outstanding.
Second. Who have they lost? A bunch of guys who have contributed to shit. Replacement? For Kevin Fucking Shafer? How about me? JB? SD? The guy was a turnstile. Not to mention a big ole pussy. You can find a Kevin Shafer in ANY round of this draft.
I ain't trying to tell you I know these guys are right. But I sure as fuck ain't going to agree they are wrong. They have lost one decent player through this "purge". Maybe 2 if you count Sean Jones. It ain't like they have to replace All-Pro because they want to win with other guys. They are replacing STIFFS. MUD. CRAP.
Please tell me all of the draft picks Eric Mangini and George Kokinis have missed on. Please tell me ho you know they cannot possibly build this team the way EVERY good team in the NFL builds, through the draft. We crow about how well the Steelers draft. How nice it is for them to have replacement players in the pipeline. How nice it is to not HAVE to overspend in FA. Now you have people in place that want to do that, and you know they are wrong. Good for you. But why? Because Randy Lerner hired them? Fuck that.

by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:38 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Pup wrote:
Dude. Cat sucked. I can probably check the archives and find a post with you begging for this cat to be sent packing.
Shitty starters are not irreplaceable. Ever.
I know. That's my point. He was average to below average, and he started. So who's his replacement. Obviously they can't promote from within, which leaves FA or the draft. They probably won't spend big money, so we are talking rookie. For every JT, there is a Robert Gallery. So who do the Browns pick? Do they take several and play the law of averages? Valuable draft picks? They only have value if the players chosen turn into what they are projected to. Buff said abundance is good only if it is goodness that is abundant. 2nd round draft picks do not abound with goodness.
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:40 pm
Pup wrote:First of all. This draft is rated very highly. Just not at the top. The depth, especially for offensive line, is outstanding.
Second. Who have they lost? A bunch of guys who have contributed to shit. Replacement? For Kevin Fucking Shafer? How about me? JB? SD? The guy was a turnstile. Not to mention a big ole pussy. You can find a Kevin Shafer in ANY round of this draft.
I ain't trying to tell you I know these guys are right. But I sure as fuck ain't going to agree they are wrong. They have lost one decent player through this "purge". Maybe 2 if you count Sean Jones. It ain't like they have to replace All-Pro because they want to win with other guys. They are replacing STIFFS. MUD. CRAP.
Please tell me all of the draft picks Eric Mangini and George Kokinis have missed on. Please tell me ho you know they cannot possibly build this team the way EVERY good team in the NFL builds, through the draft. We crow about how well the Steelers draft. How nice it is for them to have replacement players in the pipeline. How nice it is to not HAVE to overspend in FA. Now you have people in place that want to do that, and you know they are wrong. Good for you. But why? Because Randy Lerner hired them? Fuck that.
by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:43 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Pup wrote:
Dude. Cat sucked. I can probably check the archives and find a post with you begging for this cat to be sent packing.
Shitty starters are not irreplaceable. Ever.
I know. That's my point. He was average to below average, and he started. So who's his replacement. Obviously they can't promote from within, which leaves FA or the draft. They probably won't spend big money, so we are talking rookie. For every JT, there is a Robert Gallery. So who do the Browns pick? Do they take several and play the law of averages? Valuable draft picks? They only have value if the players chosen turn into what they are projected to. Buff said abundance is good only if it is goodness that is abundant. 2nd round draft picks do not abound with goodness.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:57 pm
Pup wrote:OK. Lets jump on the crazy train for a few minutes.
K2 - Replaced by Heiden and Royal. Better blocking combo. Lose a little in pass catching.
Andrea Davis - Replaced by anybody is an upgrade. Let's say they get Curry and play him inside.
Sean Jones - Replaced by Elam. Don't know much about the guy, but replacing Jones is not replacing Steve Atwater. And I like Sean Jones.
Joe J - Replaced by doesn't matter, cuz he wasn't playing.
Shafer - Let's say they replace him with O-Pace. Just for shits and giggles
Jamall - Harrison plus a draft pick.
So, we steal Curry at #5. And O-Pace want to play at home. I say we are about even talent wise. Not the goal, I agree, but hardly a fire sale. Now, with #37, we take Alex Mack at Center. Improved o-line. And at #50, we get Lesean McCoy.


by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:05 pm
by Guest » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:35 pm
by DrPoove » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:48 pm
by DrPoove » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:50 pm
Hiko wrote:I now see the light. Kevin Shaffer was the last straw. Mangini & Kokinis are trying to lose ON PURPOSE. Bastards!
Damn, was I hoodwinked.
by Guest » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:25 am
DrPoove wrote:Hiko wrote:I now see the light. Kevin Shaffer was the last straw. Mangini & Kokinis are trying to lose ON PURPOSE. Bastards!
Damn, was I hoodwinked.
Where did "Hiko, Voice of Reason" go?
PS I want royalties if that tagline ever catches fire.
by JuanBond68 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:35 am
by noles1 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:57 am

by Hydra Melee » Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:14 am
by pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:26 am
Hydra Melee wrote:I just want to ask why we released Mr. Shaffer?
Yes, I will concede that he's not very good. But what does the move accomplish? The guy has not been causing any problems (publicly, at least) and while he may save us some money it's not exactly like we're spending enough to need it.
So... why did we get rid of a starter?
by noles1 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:57 am

by Stu » Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:58 am
Pup wrote:If you don't want to give them 1 off season to improve depth and a second to improve the starters, then i don't know what to tell ya.
by js2310 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:04 am
Pup wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Pup wrote:
Dude. Cat sucked. I can probably check the archives and find a post with you begging for this cat to be sent packing.
Shitty starters are not irreplaceable. Ever.
I know. That's my point. He was average to below average, and he started. So who's his replacement. Obviously they can't promote from within, which leaves FA or the draft. They probably won't spend big money, so we are talking rookie. For every JT, there is a Robert Gallery. So who do the Browns pick? Do they take several and play the law of averages? Valuable draft picks? They only have value if the players chosen turn into what they are projected to. Buff said abundance is good only if it is goodness that is abundant. 2nd round draft picks do not abound with goodness.
OK. Lets jump on the crazy train for a few minutes.
K2 - Replaced by Heiden and Royal. Better blocking combo. Lose a little in pass catching.
Andrea Davis - Replaced by anybody is an upgrade. Let's say they get Curry and play him inside.
Sean Jones - Replaced by Elam. Don't know much about the guy, but replacing Jones is not replacing Steve Atwater. And I like Sean Jones.
Joe J - Replaced by doesn't matter, cuz he wasn't playing.
Shafer - Let's say they replace him with O-Pace. Just for shits and giggles
Jamall - Harrison plus a draft pick.
So, we steal Curry at #5. And O-Pace want to play at home. I say we are about even talent wise. Not the goal, I agree, but hardly a fire sale. Now, with #37, we take Alex Mack at Center. Improved o-line. And at #50, we get Lesean McCoy.
The signings of Bowens, Barton and such improve the depth of the football team. So, now we are even at "replacing" the released players. We have upgraded the depth. We have improved the offensive line and running game. With additional picks to improve depth more.
Call me an optimist. Mention my Brown colored glasses. Don't care. When you are 4-12, 10-6, 4-12 there are no sacred cows. When you cut bad players, they are easily replaceable. And improved upon.
by 4thQtrGlory » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:52 am
js2310 wrote:If we could go
1. Orakpo- Pure OLB, will not start but would come in on passing down to add pressure. He'll need a year to learn coverages.
2a. Alex Mack- Starting Center
2b. Hakeem Nicks or Percy Harvin- #2 wide out. Stallworth is a slot guy.
4. Mike Mickens- Nickle or Dime Corner.Should beat out Poteat if healthy.
6. Glen Coffee- Another guy who can take the load off of Lewis.

by Erie Warrior » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:23 am


by pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:52 am
by js2310 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:22 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:js2310 wrote:If we could go
1. Orakpo- Pure OLB, will not start but would come in on passing down to add pressure. He'll need a year to learn coverages.
2a. Alex Mack- Starting Center
2b. Hakeem Nicks or Percy Harvin- #2 wide out. Stallworth is a slot guy.
4. Mike Mickens- Nickle or Dime Corner.Should beat out Poteat if healthy.
6. Glen Coffee- Another guy who can take the load off of Lewis.
1. Ok, i could live with that if Curry is gone.
2a. wont be around (late first, early second)
2b. definitely wont be around (1st, possibly to Ravens)
4. wont be around (2nd or 3rd rounder)
6. would not make an impact, rather take a RB in the 2nd, and use late picks for the lines
by The Voice of Disreason » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Stu wrote:Pup wrote:If you don't want to give them 1 off season to improve depth and a second to improve the starters, then i don't know what to tell ya.
we've given them nearly 10 off seasons to do that. thats the problem. people are just fed up with it.
by waborat » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:58 pm
The Voice of Disreason wrote:Stu wrote:Pup wrote:If you don't want to give them 1 off season to improve depth and a second to improve the starters, then i don't know what to tell ya.
we've given them nearly 10 off seasons to do that. thats the problem. people are just fed up with it.
Exactly. Everyone is counting on these stupid draft picks. What makes any of you think they can draft good when the Browns haven't drafted good for the last 10 years? I don't care if ManCock didn't make those drafts, they should know what they were getting into, if they didn't want to they shouldn't have signed the contract.
They sucked to begin with and now they got rid of all their good players and they replaced them with a bunch of Jets who suck.
I'm just sick of these stupid people.
by El Heffe » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:09 pm
by Erie Warrior » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:13 pm
Pup wrote:I am not sure where this whole idea of the should be telling us the plan comes into play? Would you really feel better if they came out today and said, this is the plan. These are the guys we are targeting? What kind of sense does that make? Who would do that? Even if they said, we need a quick intelligent linebacker in the middle, without naming Curry, you don't think it would be pretty easy to determine? If they said we really want an edge rusher, that wouldn't compromise their ability to get an edge rusher? We really hope a center falls in our lap at #37. Don't you think someone else hoping that center is there at #40 would try to move ahead of us?


by DrPoove » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:52 pm

by pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:13 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Pup wrote:I am not sure where this whole idea of the should be telling us the plan comes into play? Would you really feel better if they came out today and said, this is the plan. These are the guys we are targeting? What kind of sense does that make? Who would do that? Even if they said, we need a quick intelligent linebacker in the middle, without naming Curry, you don't think it would be pretty easy to determine? If they said we really want an edge rusher, that wouldn't compromise their ability to get an edge rusher? We really hope a center falls in our lap at #37. Don't you think someone else hoping that center is there at #40 would try to move ahead of us?
Because I'm a rube, and I want something to get behind. I want to see some kind of method to the madness. It's much more interesting, as a fan, to understand the what the team is trying to do, so I can read and research and watch for players to fit the system (I can't answer why, I just like it). It makes college football more fun, it makes the combine and draft bearable. It makes me want to drive to cleveland, pay for a hotel room, spend money at the local bars, spend $8 for a beer at the stadium, and cheer for a team I'm trying to identify with. I'm the customer, and I need some kind of buy-in. Right now, I don't have that. I moved away 4 years ago, and have been to at least one game every year since. They need to make me want to come back next year.
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:18 pm
Pup wrote:Again. Simply my opinion.
You get behind the colors. Behind the jerseys. Simple as that. If you are in this for the rewards, you might be in trouble.
After this draft/season, the picture becomes more clear. We will be able to see where they are headed. At least if things go right. Which I hope. Because I have to.
by pup » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:48 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:Again. Simply my opinion.
You get behind the colors. Behind the jerseys. Simple as that. If you are in this for the rewards, you might be in trouble.
After this draft/season, the picture becomes more clear. We will be able to see where they are headed. At least if things go right. Which I hope. Because I have to.
Cue the Patton clip and the national anthem in the background........![]()
BTW, I now use your sweatshirt that came with the Fantasy League title as an extra towel when I hit the Y. You playing tomorrow or not? I can get it to you or hand it over to one of your drunken, irresponsible friends.
by Wolfy7 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:35 pm

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
