Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Chris » Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:56 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:43 pm
by BDFD » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:47 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:48 pm
by ilasch » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:06 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:06 pm
BDFD wrote:I see it differently. Everyone knew he was never going to play again and he was going to retire. Isn't the first step toward retirement is to be released? Is there another official contractual way to graciously retire? Maybe he asked to be released so it helps the team. The glass is half full today.
by Triple-S » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:What a numb nuts move. The guy wanted to play here, despite the problems with Staph. The guy has balls and heart, two things the Browns are very very short on.
Shouldn't we keep guys who WANT to play here?
Another clueless move by a moronic franchise.


Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by davemanddd » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:12 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:15 pm
by ilasch » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:26 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:37 pm
ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:18 pm
ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
by OSU819903 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:20 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
Ok, but why is it expected of Joe to restructure his contract? Why not one of the under performing slugs? Stallworthless? Joe might not play again, I get that, but it's not his fault. Why should he pay when he already endured a horrid infection? He worked hard for this team, on and off the field. Pay the man and if he can play let him, god knows he can catch and be dangerous in the red zone.
Joe doesn't owe this team a goddamn thing, it's the other way around, they owe him.
IOU 1 knee.
by 4thQtrGlory » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:20 pm

by TouchEmAllTime » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:23 pm
Peeker643 wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
ilasch- do you have the link where the club announced his release?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:40 pm
OSU819903 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
Ok, but why is it expected of Joe to restructure his contract? Why not one of the under performing slugs? Stallworthless? Joe might not play again, I get that, but it's not his fault. Why should he pay when he already endured a horrid infection? He worked hard for this team, on and off the field. Pay the man and if he can play let him, god knows he can catch and be dangerous in the red zone.
Joe doesn't owe this team a goddamn thing, it's the other way around, they owe him.
IOU 1 knee.
I love Joe and this is a bit tongue and cheek, but how much money did the team pay him last year when he couldn't do anything? Bottom line is that it's a business and for all we know Joe didn't restructure b/c he wanted to see if he could play for a winner one more time before he retires (if he can even play). And nothing that went on with this team last year is ManKok's problem. I mean they have to deal with the consequences but it is unreasonable to assume that they're going to bend over backwards for breaking down players that caught horrible breaks last year; no matter where there from.
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/article.php?id=9460
by DrPoove » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:44 pm
Peeker643 wrote:You knew he was never going to play again after you nearly killed him. Letting him dictate the terms of his retirement was too much to ask?

by Ziner » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:11 pm

by ilasch » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:48 pm
Peeker643 wrote:ilasch- do you have the link where the club announced his release? Terms of the restructure offer, cap hit, etc?
by Crash Davis » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:49 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
Ok, but why is it expected of Joe to restructure his contract? Why not one of the under performing slugs? Stallworthless? Joe might not play again.
by ilasch » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:56 pm
Crash Davis wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
Ok, but why is it expected of Joe to restructure his contract? Why not one of the under performing slugs? Stallworthless? Joe might not play again.
This is a valid point. Whoever heard of a team restructuring a contract that only had one year remaining on it and minimal cap effect? Maybe if that's happened its before I doubt its happen with a guy that was only due a $500K bonus what Joe was making. They knew they didn't want him for whatever reason and knew he wouldn't except a contract that was no longer guaranteed. This was witch hunt disguised which what I have problem with. Fine if Joe's not in your plans just say so and be upfront about it but don't go to him and dress it up as "we want to restructure that last year on your contract so you can remain a Brown" when you don't want him to start with.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:05 am
ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:ilasch- do you have the link where the club announced his release? Terms of the restructure offer, cap hit, etc?
AP Story regarding his release:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jBOvSIRmoo01FrZvh9gWSr10g3hgD96S6R0O0
"The Browns had approached Jurevicius and his agent, David Dunn, about restructuring his contract."
Here's where rotoworld is actually reporting that he was due $2.9M this year:
http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=Nfl&id=245
"Jurevicius was due $2.9M and the poor guy underwent seven known knee surgeries in less than a 12-month span ending in Dec. 2008."
The only place I can find a citation of the $0.5M bonus he was due is on OBR, and I'm not going to cite another message board as gospel. Incidentally, they also called that a roster bonus, so there's a chance the Browns saved all $2.9M.
Anyway, I'm just trying to look at both sides of the story. I'm as sorry to see Joe go as just about anyone here, but it's part of the business, and not just this organization. You can hate the system, but don't hate just one cog in the machine.
by ilasch » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:19 am
Peeker643 wrote:No arguing that ilasch. Just arguing the 'hows'. Believe me, I understand the business and the fact his story was written when he got hurt and cut 7 times. But you reap what you sow regarding how you go about things. You can alienate a lot of people and prospective players in how you handle things.
Another opportunity lost in building relationships with people, fans, players, alum, etc.
by Crash Davis » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:24 am
ilasch wrote:Crash Davis wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Just to be clear, I've said since last year that JJ would never play again. I have no problem with that. I just have an issue when a native who did and said all the right things gets yanked around.
I know it's a business and I know he's done, but there's a right and wrong way, IMO. to go about it.
Receivers that can't jog are not amongst you best players. Although I can understand the thought when Steptoe and Stallworth are still on the roster.
Look, I'm a big Joe Jurevicius fan, and always have been. But let's be honest. The team went to him, in the last year of his deal, and asked him to restructure so that they wouldn't have to pay him almost two and a half million. He decided that he didn't owe the team anything, as is his right. But in the NFL, if it would save a team money to cut you, they ask you restructure, and you decline, there is only ever one outcome. With all the surgeries he's had, you knew he wasn't going to play. That they even gave him the option to restructure is a small miracle.
You can't read the last chapter of a book and complain that the author sucks because he didn't pay enough attention to developing his characters...
Ok, but why is it expected of Joe to restructure his contract? Why not one of the under performing slugs? Stallworthless? Joe might not play again.
This is a valid point. Whoever heard of a team restructuring a contract that only had one year remaining on it and minimal cap effect? Maybe if that's happened its before I doubt its happen with a guy that was only due a $500K bonus what Joe was making. They knew they didn't want him for whatever reason and knew he wouldn't except a contract that was no longer guaranteed. This was witch hunt disguised which what I have problem with. Fine if Joe's not in your plans just say so and be upfront about it but don't go to him and dress it up as "we want to restructure that last year on your contract so you can remain a Brown" when you don't want him to start with.
What's your legitimate worst case scenario? That they offered him veteran minimum or they'd cut him? So he had the option of taking the vet minimum of $1.1M for a year he may very well not even play, or opting to stick with his nearly $3 million contract, knowing he might be cut anyway if he takes option #2? If he got the raw end of the deal, it's because he chose it.
by ilasch » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:33 am
Crash Davis wrote:My legitimate worse case scenario is they went to him asking him to restructure his contract that barely effected their cap this year knowing without guaranteed money in the new, restructured deal he wouldn't take it because they didn't want him back anyway. I only have a problem with the way it went down, they didn't want him so fine just say we're moving in a different direction.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:37 am
ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:No arguing that ilasch. Just arguing the 'hows'. Believe me, I understand the business and the fact his story was written when he got hurt and cut 7 times. But you reap what you sow regarding how you go about things. You can alienate a lot of people and prospective players in how you handle things.
Another opportunity lost in building relationships with people, fans, players, alum, etc.
I'm not saying that you're wrong just for having that idea occur to you. But the amazing thing to me, in this situation, is that they went to him in the last year of his deal and even asked to restructure. I've seen this same situation play out numerous times before, but you know how it starts every time? The team just cuts the guy, no warning given, then tries to re-sign him when he's staring down a year of making $0. In recent memory, the way the Jets played the Brandon Moore issue comes to mind.
It always seems sudden, particularly when the front office isn't giving daily updates. I haven't seen one quote yet from Joe J saying he was dissatisfied with how it all went down. Until I do, I'm reserving judgment.
by Crash Davis » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:42 am
ilasch wrote:Crash Davis wrote:My legitimate worse case scenario is they went to him asking him to restructure his contract that barely effected their cap this year knowing without guaranteed money in the new, restructured deal he wouldn't take it because they didn't want him back anyway. I only have a problem with the way it went down, they didn't want him so fine just say we're moving in a different direction.
Where have you heard that they didn't want him? Everything I've read sounded regretful that a deal couldn't be worked out.
They gave him a chance to earn at least a million dollars, if he could play. Their other options were to unceremoniously cut the guy or to pay him half a mil for nostalgia's sake. Neither of those are in any way smart.
by ilasch » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:46 am
Peeker643 wrote:That's fair enough. You won't hear Jurevicius say shit even if he has a mouthful though. Just my guess, because the guy ain't about that.
The org just no longer gets the benefit of doubt with me though. I've been wrong before, I hope I am again.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:08 am
ilasch wrote:Peeker643 wrote:That's fair enough. You won't hear Jurevicius say shit even if he has a mouthful though. Just my guess, because the guy ain't about that.
The org just no longer gets the benefit of doubt with me though. I've been wrong before, I hope I am again.
No, you're probably right about that. Joe won't say boo. But if the situation was mishandled at all, I'd put money on the CPD catching wind of it and airing it out just to say again how badly Mangini and Kokinis are mismanaging things.
I'm not trying to give anyone the benefit of the doubt, really. Just trying to wait until all the facts are in. If the new front office really tried to hose Joe J, shame on them. If all they did was try to refrain from throwing half a mil his way while not knowing if the guy will even see the field, it's a different story, at least in my eyes.
And Crash, you're right, it's not a huge cap figure. But giving a guy who can't play half a mil guaranteed when you just took heat for laying off some staff wouldn't endear them to the fans, either.
Anyway, I'm done. I'm sure I end up sounding like a shill, and that's not at all where I'm trying to go. I just don't see it as black and white as everyone else seems to. At least, not yet.
by 4thQtrGlory » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:53 am

by OrangeElf » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:00 am
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:01 am
4thQtrGlory wrote:so who do you guys think is next on list cuts/trades? Im thinking Kevin Schaffer or Donte Stallworth. Im pretty sure we might be stuck with Donte's contract, but at this point id trade him for a bag of footballs if it meant dumping his salary.
by jb » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:10 am
Chris wrote:Per Tony Rizzo on Fox 8.
....er.....wow.
by Lubber » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:13 am
OrangeElf wrote:The Cleveland Browns think they can do whatever they want because they have an iron-clad grip on the Fans. But I think that the losing seasons, poorly-run organization, and total lack of class will begin to wear on the fans and we may begin to see the Browns slip in popularity. This move may be the start of that revolt. This organization is sorely in need of some good PR along with the obvious a good product on the field. If Mangini can deliver the later the PR situation will take care of itself but he does not deliver I am not sure these fans will take to kindly to another restructuring of the organization. My prediction is that Mangini will have three or four average years here and will have alienated the media and fans to the point that Randy has no choice but fire him.
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:13 am
OrangeElf wrote:The Cleveland Browns think they can do whatever they want because they have an iron-clad grip on the Fans. But I think that the losing seasons, poorly-run organization, and total lack of class will begin to wear on the fans and we may begin to see the Browns slip in popularity. This move may be the start of that revolt. This organization is sorely in need of some good PR along with the obvious a good product on the field. If Mangini can deliver the later the PR situation will take care of itself but he does not deliver I am not sure these fans will take to kindly to another restructuring of the organization. My prediction is that Mangini will have three or four average years here and will have alienated the media and fans to the point that Randy has no choice but fire him.
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:15 am
JCoz wrote:OrangeElf wrote:The Cleveland Browns think they can do whatever they want because they have an iron-clad grip on the Fans. But I think that the losing seasons, poorly-run organization, and total lack of class will begin to wear on the fans and we may begin to see the Browns slip in popularity. This move may be the start of that revolt. This organization is sorely in need of some good PR along with the obvious a good product on the field. If Mangini can deliver the later the PR situation will take care of itself but he does not deliver I am not sure these fans will take to kindly to another restructuring of the organization. My prediction is that Mangini will have three or four average years here and will have alienated the media and fans to the point that Randy has no choice but fire him.
Do you really think that this is their mind-set? DO you actually think they act with the thought that they can do anything they want because the have fans' balls in a vice?
Come on. Mangini and Kokonis have a job and someone to answer to. They can't make decisions based on the fact that they have a captive audience in C-town fans, they have to make decisions based on what they think is best for the team, and to clarify that, I mean they have to make whatever decisions they beilieve will help the Browns win games, because that's how they will keep thier jobs.
by jb » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:17 am
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:47 am
JB wrote:Comes around, goes around Lake County-ites.
Now you know why I was all bent over Bently last year.
I hear Roger's gravvelly voice and Pete's guitar. New boss. Old boss.
The common denominator lies where?
Oh well, at least Butch Davis is hooked up still.
I can't wait for the inevitable SD post telling everyone to pull up their lacey thongs and adjust their garter belts. 3...2...1...
by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:22 am
JCoz wrote:JB wrote:Comes around, goes around Lake County-ites.
Now you know why I was all bent over Bently last year.
I hear Roger's gravvelly voice and Pete's guitar. New boss. Old boss.
The common denominator lies where?
Oh well, at least Butch Davis is hooked up still.
I can't wait for the inevitable SD post telling everyone to pull up their lacey thongs and adjust their garter belts. 3...2...1...
What did Bentley end up doing last season?
by JCoz » Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:28 am
Pup wrote:JCoz wrote:JB wrote:Comes around, goes around Lake County-ites.
Now you know why I was all bent over Bently last year.
I hear Roger's gravvelly voice and Pete's guitar. New boss. Old boss.
The common denominator lies where?
Oh well, at least Butch Davis is hooked up still.
I can't wait for the inevitable SD post telling everyone to pull up their lacey thongs and adjust their garter belts. 3...2...1...
What did Bentley end up doing last season?
The same thing Joe is going to do this year.
Your one season was magic Joe.
by DrPoove » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:10 pm
by pup » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:19 pm
by idoctribefan » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:21 pm
JCoz wrote:4thQtrGlory wrote:so who do you guys think is next on list cuts/trades? Im thinking Kevin Schaffer or Donte Stallworth. Im pretty sure we might be stuck with Donte's contract, but at this point id trade him for a bag of footballs if it meant dumping his salary.
Even if they "dumped" his salary in a trade, they would get hammered with the accelerated cap hit if I understand it correctly.
We seem to be completely stuck with him right now. Can't cut him or trade him and end up in a better position than we're in right now. Perhaps next year we can do something with him.

by peeker643 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:49 pm
Pup wrote:What are they supposed to do? Have a presser and give him a key to the city?
by justmebd » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:18 pm
by Guest » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:25 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:What are they supposed to do? Have a presser and give him a key to the city?
Well, a team that has any sense and class at all would read the tea leaves (or any fucking message board in town, radio show, etc) and see they have an image problem right now.
Then they would hold a press conference, potentially have Jurevicius in the room, advise they're discussing a position within the organization, you know, the right thing.
Even if they're not. Even if JJ wanted no part of it. Get up there without him amd put your best spin on the situation. Take the high ground and position yourself going forward.
Why? because people are stupid, 90% of Browns fans are stupid and 90% of the morons would suck it up, believe and assume this org cares about things like kids who grew up here, came back here and were nearly maimed here.
April 1st deadline for making a choice on renewing tickets (the irony of the date is thick).
So yeah, anything other than the standard "we appreciate insert name here and his contributions" press release would have been appropriate.
Not so much because they were sincere, though that would have been nice to see, but because it would have shown they were at least thinking beyond the move they made.
They don't have the talent to play any game right now. Not on the field and not in the board room.
by leadpipe » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:34 pm
Hiko wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:What are they supposed to do? Have a presser and give him a key to the city?
Well, a team that has any sense and class at all would read the tea leaves (or any fucking message board in town, radio show, etc) and see they have an image problem right now.
Then they would hold a press conference, potentially have Jurevicius in the room, advise they're discussing a position within the organization, you know, the right thing.
Even if they're not. Even if JJ wanted no part of it. Get up there without him amd put your best spin on the situation. Take the high ground and position yourself going forward.
Why? because people are stupid, 90% of Browns fans are stupid and 90% of the morons would suck it up, believe and assume this org cares about things like kids who grew up here, came back here and were nearly maimed here.
April 1st deadline for making a choice on renewing tickets (the irony of the date is thick).
So yeah, anything other than the standard "we appreciate insert name here and his contributions" press release would have been appropriate.
Not so much because they were sincere, though that would have been nice to see, but because it would have shown they were at least thinking beyond the move they made.
They don't have the talent to play any game right now. Not on the field and not in the board room.
I too am disheartened by JJ getting cut. But, uh, you might be going off the deep end a bit on this post.
Mangini & Kokinis don't owe JJ a goddam thing. Lerner, however, does. Maybe Lerner will give him that Chris Palmer guy-don't-go-away-mad-just-go-away payment.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:51 pm
Hiko wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:What are they supposed to do? Have a presser and give him a key to the city?
Well, a team that has any sense and class at all would read the tea leaves (or any fucking message board in town, radio show, etc) and see they have an image problem right now.
Then they would hold a press conference, potentially have Jurevicius in the room, advise they're discussing a position within the organization, you know, the right thing.
Even if they're not. Even if JJ wanted no part of it. Get up there without him amd put your best spin on the situation. Take the high ground and position yourself going forward.
Why? because people are stupid, 90% of Browns fans are stupid and 90% of the morons would suck it up, believe and assume this org cares about things like kids who grew up here, came back here and were nearly maimed here.
April 1st deadline for making a choice on renewing tickets (the irony of the date is thick).
So yeah, anything other than the standard "we appreciate insert name here and his contributions" press release would have been appropriate.
Not so much because they were sincere, though that would have been nice to see, but because it would have shown they were at least thinking beyond the move they made.
They don't have the talent to play any game right now. Not on the field and not in the board room.
I too am disheartened by JJ getting cut. But, uh, you might be going off the deep end a bit on this post.
Mangini & Kokinis don't owe JJ a goddam thing. Lerner, however, does. Maybe Lerner will give him that Chris Palmer guy-don't-go-away-mad-just-go-away payment.
by Guest » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:57 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:Hiko wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:What are they supposed to do? Have a presser and give him a key to the city?
Well, a team that has any sense and class at all would read the tea leaves (or any fucking message board in town, radio show, etc) and see they have an image problem right now.
Then they would hold a press conference, potentially have Jurevicius in the room, advise they're discussing a position within the organization, you know, the right thing.
Even if they're not. Even if JJ wanted no part of it. Get up there without him amd put your best spin on the situation. Take the high ground and position yourself going forward.
Why? because people are stupid, 90% of Browns fans are stupid and 90% of the morons would suck it up, believe and assume this org cares about things like kids who grew up here, came back here and were nearly maimed here.
April 1st deadline for making a choice on renewing tickets (the irony of the date is thick).
So yeah, anything other than the standard "we appreciate insert name here and his contributions" press release would have been appropriate.
Not so much because they were sincere, though that would have been nice to see, but because it would have shown they were at least thinking beyond the move they made.
They don't have the talent to play any game right now. Not on the field and not in the board room.
I too am disheartened by JJ getting cut. But, uh, you might be going off the deep end a bit on this post.
Mangini & Kokinis don't owe JJ a goddam thing. Lerner, however, does. Maybe Lerner will give him that Chris Palmer guy-don't-go-away-mad-just-go-away payment.
But by saying Lerner does, isn't taht agreeing with Peeker?
Look, this situation, with a local product, given the current public perceptions of the organization, could have been handled better.
That's all.
It's not a huge deal, but you could look at it as an opportunity lost ILO.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:57 pm
Peeker643 wrote:
Why? because people are stupid, 90% of Browns fans are stupid and 90% of the morons would suck it up, believe and assume this org cares about things like kids who grew up here, came back here and were nearly maimed here.


Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests