Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by pup » Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:48 am
by consigliere » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:14 pm

by pup » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:31 pm
How about we fire the head coach first?
If they come back with both Savage and Crennel it is pure idiocy. Another season down the drains next year....and my worst nightmare is Crennel returns and we play a little above our heads and go like 7-9 or 8-8 and then he returns another year! We are not winning anything with this guy as the head coach. Cut bait now!
by consigliere » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:39 pm

by Dozen » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:41 pm
by pup » Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:26 pm
Maybe Pup is right
by comish » Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:55 pm

by consigliere » Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:14 pm

by furls » Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:50 pm
by Dozen » Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:12 pm
by dpdad » Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:32 pm
by Dozen » Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:57 pm
POSTED 9:42 a.m. EST; LAST UPDATED 11:08 a.m. EST, January 6, 2007
CRENNEL HAS NO CONTROL OVER HIS STAFF
Multiple league sources have advised us that the current exodus of assistants from the Browns organization is occurring regardless of the opinions of the head coach.
The problem is that Crennel's contract doesn't reserve to him the ability to hire and fire assistant coaches. It's believed that the current decisions regarding who'll stay and who'll go are being made not by Crennel, but by G.M. Phil Savage.
Per one source, Crennel's contract says that he serves at the pleasure of the President of the Club and also will perform "other duties that may be reasonably assigned to him by the President of the Club." Nothing in the contract says that he has the exclusive ability to build and change his staff.
Gone in the past two days are receivers coach Terry Robiskie, offensive quality control coach Carl Crennel (Romeo's nephew), tight ends coach Ben Coates, and strength and conditioning coach John Lott.
Running backs coach Dave Atkins also is reportedly in danger of being fired.
So while we reported earlier in the week that Crennel might have to overhaul his staff in order to remain employed, it now appears that Crennel had no power to prevent the moves that already have occurred.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
by consigliere » Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:17 pm

by consigliere » Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:11 pm
Bill Henry wrote:While it may be painful right now, it's better than not having a team. :safe:

by pup » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:27 pm
by consigliere » Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:53 pm

by pup » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:11 pm
Right now, new coach or not, 2007 is a dead season. But, by bringing Romeo back, you possibly have set yourself back in 2008.....or even 2009...since we will be looking for a new coach next year.
by consigliere » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:14 pm

by pup » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:32 pm
So just keep a lame duck coach around? And, what happens if the team over-achieves some next year and they go 7-9 or 8-8? Then we get ANOTHER year of Crennel. Yippee!
Let's get a new guy in here, draft a QB with the 1st pick, establish our team in 2007, and gun for 2008.
by consigliere » Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:05 pm

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest