by HoodooMan » Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:30 pm
At the very, very, very least give Seattle the TD they scored that was wrongly taken away from them (+4, since they converted the FG), take away the TD Ben Roethlisberger didn't get and assume the Steelers convert the short FG (-4), and go ahead and assume Seattle would just shoot themselves in the foot at 1st & Goal from the 2 in the 4th quarter (the one that was wrongly ripped from them) and have to settle for the chip shot 3.
That's a tie game.
Maybe Neil O'Roethlisberger gets all clutch on us and marchs the Steelers down the field for the game winning score, who knows. But, all things considered, that was at least an evenly played game, and we should have gotten to see the tie-breaker.
BTW, for all the focus on Seattle's imperfect game, how 'bout them Stillers?
Big Ben 22.6 QB Rating!
Take away Parker's breakaway run, a 3.3 YPC rushing game the rest of the night!
Ah, but Jeramy Stevens dropped some passes and they failed to score in the 2-minute drill, so fair's fair, right? What a bunch of BS. All I've heard all day is how teams should be able to overcome bad calls, as it's just a part of the game, and they shouldn't whine about the Refs costing them the game. 99% of the time I agree with this, because it's generally the response given to fans bitching about ONE (note the loneliness of that number) bad call at the end of a close game, but when as here you have several, several really bad calls from start to finish and they're all going against one team, you've got yourself a serious problem. Seattle overcame bad calls several times in that game by repeatedly putting themselves in position to take control of the game, but that was then repeatedly ripped right back from them. If there's ever been a game of 15 on 11, that was it.