Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by swerb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:19 am
by Chris » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:43 am
by Guest » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:45 am
by Ziner » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:50 am
by Triple-S » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:52 am
Hiko wrote:All I know is that suddenly Bruce Arians is supposedly a genius in PIT.
With the right leadership, even blind hacks can somewhat succeed.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:55 am
by OrangeElf » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:59 am
BooyaCS wrote:Typical Browns fans are never happy. Sure have someone fail before he is even A.) Hired B.) Given a chance.
Also I think Mangini brings his assistants from NY with him so
Brian Shottenhiemer - OC/AHC
Callahan - OL Coach
Sutton - DC
Romeo - DL or Special Assistant
The rumors of Romeo staying on where if McDaniels was HC then Romeo would probably stay on as DC.
And finally Swerb Thomas Dimitroff up until this past year was the director of college scouting for the NE Patriots. The GM is really only supposed to get the players then disappear until the draft comes around.
Again if you can evaluate talent you are going to be a decent GM just as long as you don't have full control (this is where Phil went wrong).
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:01 am
by swerb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:04 am
BooyaCS wrote:Typical Browns fans are never happy. Sure have someone fail before he is even A.) Hired B.) Given a chance.
Also I think Mangini brings his assistants from NY with him so
Brian Shottenhiemer - OC/AHC
Callahan - OL Coach
Sutton - DC
Romeo - DL or Special Assistant
The rumors of Romeo staying on where if McDaniels was HC then Romeo would probably stay on as DC.
And finally Swerb Thomas Dimitroff up until this past year was the director of college scouting for the NE Patriots. The GM is really only supposed to get the players then disappear until the draft comes around.
Again if you can evaluate talent you are going to be a decent GM just as long as you don't have full control (this is where Phil went wrong).
by OrangeElf » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:05 am
BooyaCS wrote:Callahan is the Assistant HC in NY. Wouldn't tagging Shottenhiemer as the AHC technically be a promotion?
by papacass » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:07 am
by StewieG » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:11 am
Papa Cass wrote:Why the flippity-flip is Randy not hiring a guy to hire these guys? What on Earth does hiring a GM and coach independent of each other accomplish? Hire Parcells, McKay, ANYONE qualified to oversee the football operations and let him hire the GM, who then hires the coach. It's called creating a chain of accountability.
Instead it's going to be another grand oil/water experiment in which Lerner mashes a HC and GM togther and assumes it will all work out because their careers were simultaneously spawned from the loins of the Bill Belichick regime here in the early '90s.
I agree with what Grossi wrote this evening: Jammies is utterly convinced that if he keeps trying to build bridges between the present and the Belichick teams of the early '90s, he'll somehow tap the mojo of the Pats by extension.
Get over it, Randy. You haven't had an original idea since becoming owner of this team. You don't know football, you only know what others tell you about football. And apparently you're listening to the wrong people. Mangini/Kokinis will be Savage/Crennel Part 2, except the dominant personality will be on the sideline instead of in the front office. Same shit, different day, and it will all end with another 4-12 season in 2012.
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:14 am
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:15 am
by Ziner » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:16 am
BooyaCS wrote:Here is the bio on Kokinis and yes he has scouted players before.
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/People/Staff/Player_Personnel/George_Kokinis.aspx
by swerb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:19 am
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:20 am
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:26 am
by Ziner » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:26 am
BooyaCS wrote:So then if you think you can do a better job then why not contact Lerner for an interview? I mean what 3/4 of this board think they can do this so much easier and better than Lerner right?
by swerb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:26 am
BooyaCS wrote:So then if you think you can do a better job then why not contact Lerner for an interview? I mean what 3/4 of this board think they can do this so much easier and better than Lerner right?
by OrangeElf » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:30 am
Swerb wrote:BooyaCS wrote:So then if you think you can do a better job then why not contact Lerner for an interview? I mean what 3/4 of this board think they can do this so much easier and better than Lerner right?
I think a chimpanzee could have done better than what Randy has done since taking the team over for Al.
Let's review ...
1. Gives Butch Davis ultimate power, Pete Garcia becomes the most in over his head GM in NFL history.
2. Hires John Collins as team President 3 months after he takes credit for Janet Jackson showing her titty at the Super Bowl, fires him a year later.
3. Hires Romeo, says "we knew right away we had our guy, we were all really impressed by him". Romeo goes on to become quite possibly the worst head coach in the history of professional sports.
4. Hires Phil.
Kenneth Lay and Dave Daberko exhibited better decision making.
I'd contact Lerner for an interview, but he may actually be dumb enough to take me up on it.
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:39 am
by BadBecks » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:47 am
by buckeye319 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:13 am
Ziner wrote:The only thing I dont get is why Randy doesnt just sell. The Browns seems to be a burden for him. He doesnt go to games, doesnt live here, doesnt participate in the day to day operations he doesnt need the money etc. Just sell the team. All I can think of is he thinks his dad would want him to keep the team, and while he may have, if his heart isnt in it, that just isnt fair.
by Chris » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:35 am
by jb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:10 am
Swerb wrote:BooyaCS wrote:So then if you think you can do a better job then why not contact Lerner for an interview? I mean what 3/4 of this board think they can do this so much easier and better than Lerner right?
I think a chimpanzee could have done better than what Randy has done since taking the team over for Al.
Let's review ...
1. Gives Butch Davis ultimate power, Pete Garcia becomes the most in over his head GM in NFL history.
2. Hires John Collins as team President 3 months after he takes credit for Janet Jackson showing her titty at the Super Bowl, fires him a year later.
3. Hires Romeo, says "we knew right away we had our guy, we were all really impressed by him". Romeo goes on to become quite possibly the worst head coach in the history of professional sports.
4. Hires Phil.
Kenneth Lay and Dave Daberko exhibited better decision making.
I'd contact Lerner for an interview, but he may actually be dumb enough to take me up on it.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:34 am

by xdawg80 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:02 am
by Ziner » Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:04 pm
Chris wrote:Randy is at every Browns game. Can people please stop saying he doesn't go to the games simply because it makes your argument look better?
by leadpipe » Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:19 pm
Ziner wrote:Chris wrote:Randy is at every Browns game. Can people please stop saying he doesn't go to the games simply because it makes your argument look better?
He is? never seen him on the tube with the exception of a few times. Does he go to road games? Anyone care to back this up?
by DrPoove » Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:45 pm
Ziner wrote:Chris wrote:Randy is at every Browns game. Can people please stop saying he doesn't go to the games simply because it makes your argument look better?
He is? never seen him on the tube with the exception of a few times. Does he go to road games? Anyone care to back this up?
by DrPoove » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:02 pm
BooyaCS wrote:Lets review give a first time HC full control (Butch and Garcia) which at the time no one had issues with it. Lets not forget that was the only playoff team in the 10 years since we have been back.
Hires Collins and fires him because Collins saw through Savage and noticed Savage was a fake. The fans went to bat for Savage and Randy Listened.
Ok so you weren't on board with the Phil or Romeo hires at the time (not looking back on them now)? A vast majority of the fans wanted those 2 and even during the Collins power struggle thought Phil was doing a great job. Only this season did we find out that Collins was right.
Again Lerner is doing what he can. He is also better than Ford, Al Davis and a few other owners out there.
So your saying Randy Listens to the fans too much? Then I take it we should rehire Savage and RAC then huh? Also the insanity quotes only apply when you hire 2 FIRST TIMERS IN THEIR POSITIONS. If I remember correctly wasn't Mangini a HC before? Or Doesn't that count because he didn't win a SB so obviously he must suck.
by CP » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:31 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:09 pm
by jamesownsdet » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:33 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Alarmed, not alarmed. Pioli or Mangini. He's moving too fast, he's fucking moving too slow. Don't want the Belichik tree, don't want the Ravens tree (Is there a Chiefs tree you humps can agree on?).
Cowher was buying a house, Winslow banged a whore and had an STD.
The track record on these board predictions is piss poor and valid information seems scarce.
I understand this is what we do and we're not going to dissect the counter trey during the offseason, but for everyone who believes their insight and opinions (and theirs alone) are the only valid insights and opinions, you might wanna check yourselves.
Rumor and innuendo is exactly that. Getting pissy with each other over it makes little sense.
Go take your kid to a movie and enjoy your day,
Pastor Peeker.
by ProgRocker » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:59 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:00 pm
ProgRocker wrote:And I remember that when the Patriots paid a draft pick to get Belichick from the Jets that everyone thought the Pats were psychotic. Ditto the Buccaneers when they did the same thing to get Chucky from the Raidahs. While everyone -- and I mean EVERYONE -- in the NFL and Brownsdom did backflips when Butch Davis took the job. Frankly, most of us were thrilled when Savage took the job four years ago.
In other words ... all of this is, in part, a crapshoot.
All we can agree on is that Savage and Romeo had to go, and they have gone, and while there are no guarantees that what happens next will be better, we know for a fact that what has happened hasn't worked and needed to change.
I'm amused and a bit exasperated by the hyperventilating that continues to occur, and it really, REALLY needs to stop for something more constructive. Like rooting against the Rats.
Which I'm about to do now, so if you'll excuse me ...

by Dozen » Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:43 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Alarmed, not alarmed. Pioli or Mangini. He's moving too fast, he's fucking moving too slow. Don't want the Belichik tree, don't want the Ravens tree (Is there a Chiefs tree you humps can agree on?).
Cowher was buying a house, Winslow banged a whore and had an STD.
The track record on these board predictions is piss poor and valid information seems scarce.
I understand this is what we do and we're not going to dissect the counter trey during the offseason, but for everyone who believes their insight and opinions (and theirs alone) are the only valid insights and opinions, you might wanna check yourselves.
Rumor and innuendo is exactly that. Getting pissy with each other over it makes little sense.
Go take your kid to a movie and enjoy your day,
Pastor Peeker.
by DrPoove » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:17 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:19 pm
DrPoove wrote:LOL.
Can we all agree that Donte' Stallworth must go as well?
by DrPoove » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:26 pm
Peeker643 wrote:DrPoove wrote:LOL.
Can we all agree that Donte' Stallworth must go as well?
Who the hell is that?
by Chris » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:41 pm
DrPoove wrote:Peeker643 wrote:DrPoove wrote:LOL.
Can we all agree that Donte' Stallworth must go as well?
Who the hell is that?
+1

by jb » Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:48 pm
Chris wrote:DrPoove wrote:Peeker643 wrote:DrPoove wrote:LOL.
Can we all agree that Donte' Stallworth must go as well?
Who the hell is that?
+1
How many of your posts consist of just "+1"![]()
by DrPoove » Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:34 pm
Chris wrote:How many of your posts consist of just "+1"![]()
by Chris » Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:41 pm
DrPoove wrote:Chris wrote:How many of your posts consist of just "+1"![]()
Actually this was my first one. Stole it from someone else. But I did it on another thread just to appease your easily amused a$$.
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:48 pm
by Dozen » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:00 pm
BooyaCS wrote:You take a 7M cap hit or thereabouts for the next 3 years if you cut Stallworth. He had what 15M guarenteed and only 4 of that was paid out last season? So add his guarenteed money plus the base to come up with the cap hit. You cut Stallworth and we are in cap hell. (DA is already going to cost us at least 5M if we cut him).
by 4thQtrGlory » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:08 pm
Dozen wrote:BooyaCS wrote:You take a 7M cap hit or thereabouts for the next 3 years if you cut Stallworth. He had what 15M guarenteed and only 4 of that was paid out last season? So add his guarenteed money plus the base to come up with the cap hit. You cut Stallworth and we are in cap hell. (DA is already going to cost us at least 5M if we cut him).
It wouldnt be 7 mil x 3 yrs. If he was cut today they would owe him last years base + the 10 mil he was guaranteed.
He is due a roster bonus sometime in March for 4.75 mil, no chance he's here to collect it.
The year before he signed a 6 yr 33.1 million dollar contract with the Pats and to my knowledge they arent paying any cap hits from it. The only #'s that truly matter are a signing bonus, thats the ONLY thing guaranteed in NFL contracts.

by Lubber » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:38 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:Dozen wrote:BooyaCS wrote:You take a 7M cap hit or thereabouts for the next 3 years if you cut Stallworth. He had what 15M guarenteed and only 4 of that was paid out last season? So add his guarenteed money plus the base to come up with the cap hit. You cut Stallworth and we are in cap hell. (DA is already going to cost us at least 5M if we cut him).
It wouldnt be 7 mil x 3 yrs. If he was cut today they would owe him last years base + the 10 mil he was guaranteed.
He is due a roster bonus sometime in March for 4.75 mil, no chance he's here to collect it.
The year before he signed a 6 yr 33.1 million dollar contract with the Pats and to my knowledge they arent paying any cap hits from it. The only #'s that truly matter are a signing bonus, thats the ONLY thing guaranteed in NFL contracts.
Thats not too bad of a hit. JJ will hopefully be back to take the #2 slot back for one more year. So we actually will have another year to prepare in the draft and FA for WR.
by BooyaCS » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:59 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
